History of Speech Communication Models and Messages Lee

  • Slides: 26
Download presentation
History of “Speech Communication”: Models and Messages Lee & Baldwin

History of “Speech Communication”: Models and Messages Lee & Baldwin

1. Rhetoric n Earliest study: Ancient cultures – Greece: Aristotle, Plato – Rome: Cicero,

1. Rhetoric n Earliest study: Ancient cultures – Greece: Aristotle, Plato – Rome: Cicero, Quintilian – China, India n Beginning of a discipline (19001940) – 1914: National Association of Academic Teachers of Public Speaking – Departments of English – Focus on public speaking

1. Rhetoric, cont. n From practice to theory (1940 -present) – Aristotle (again): Logic,

1. Rhetoric, cont. n From practice to theory (1940 -present) – Aristotle (again): Logic, credibility, emotion – Burke (dramatism): Speech to remove guilt – Fisher (narrative paradigm): Stories well told (believable, coherent)

2. Early Media Research n The beginnings (1900 -1920 s) – Some early writers

2. Early Media Research n The beginnings (1900 -1920 s) – Some early writers § Charles Cooley (sociology) § Robert Park (sociology, journalist, human rights activist) § John Dewey (educational philosopher)

2. Early Media Research n Strong effects models: Post WW 1 (1920 s-1950 s)

2. Early Media Research n Strong effects models: Post WW 1 (1920 s-1950 s) – Media as “hypodermic needle” or “magic bullet” – A “mass audience, ”—people with the same characteristics/effects – Started with analysis of radio effects, Hitler’s propaganda, and gaining support for U. S. war effort (WWII) – Radio available but only 3 tv channels so viewing options limited

2. Early Media Research n Limited effects models (1950 s to 1960 s) –

2. Early Media Research n Limited effects models (1950 s to 1960 s) – Post WW 2—a move from focus on mass audience to demographic groups – People were seen as choice-makers—not “sponges” soaking up media’s influence – Origin of Uses and Gratifications Theory

2. Early Media Research n Summary thoughts – Strongest influence from sociology, psychology, social

2. Early Media Research n Summary thoughts – Strongest influence from sociology, psychology, social psychology – Strong basis in scientific method, “media effects” paradigm – A change over the years in how strong media’s influence is – Began in early 1900 s, but focus continues today

3. Scientific View of Face-to-Face Communication n Persuasion – A move from “rhetoric” (analysis

3. Scientific View of Face-to-Face Communication n Persuasion – A move from “rhetoric” (analysis of speeches) to “variables” § Both in change of attitudes/beliefs (traditional persuasion) and change in behavior (compliance gaining—more recently) – Some early writers (1930 s-1950 s) § Kurt Lewin: Small group interaction, group leadership, gatekeeping, networks § Carl Hovland: Persuasion, source credibility, 2 -sided messages

3. Scientific View of Face-to-Face Communication n Relationship research – Self-disclosure (Jourard, 1960 s)

3. Scientific View of Face-to-Face Communication n Relationship research – Self-disclosure (Jourard, 1960 s) – Relational growth: (1970 s) § Altman & Taylor: Social penetration theory § Thibaut & Kelley: Social exchange theory § Berger & Calabrese: Uncertainty reduction theory

3. 5 Sociological View of Face-to. Face Communication (Metts add) n Goffman – Face

3. 5 Sociological View of Face-to. Face Communication (Metts add) n Goffman – Face and facework n Brown & Levinson (socio-linguists) – Politeness theory n Scheflen – Quasi-courtship behaviors – Body language and social order: Communication as behavioral control

4. Sociology of Culture n Chicago School (of Sociology) – View: communication creates culture

4. Sociology of Culture n Chicago School (of Sociology) – View: communication creates culture – Social reality as process, not effect; “social construction of reality” (Berger & Luckmann, 1969) n Symbolic Interactionism & Media – We co-create reality through messages – Media messages are part of the process of reality construction

5. Marxist (critical) Approaches n The Original Marx – The haves (bourgeoisie) & have-nots

5. Marxist (critical) Approaches n The Original Marx – The haves (bourgeoisie) & have-nots (proletariat): owners & workers – Economic system (base) drives all else—religion, education, family, culture (superstructure)

5. Marxist (critical) Approaches, cont. n Modified Marxism (1970’s to present) – – It’s

5. Marxist (critical) Approaches, cont. n Modified Marxism (1970’s to present) – – It’s not just class, but race, sex, etc. Oppression not always deliberate Cultural studies, feminism, semiotics Focus on group-held power, oppression (racism, classism, sexism), empowerment, resistence – Media studies take a humanistic and critical turn!

Some Models of Communication: Ogden & Richards Triangle of Meaning “D-o-g” Reference (Thought) Symbol

Some Models of Communication: Ogden & Richards Triangle of Meaning “D-o-g” Reference (Thought) Symbol (Word: D-o-g) Referent (Reality)

Lasswell’s Model of Mediated Communication Who says What in Which channel to Whom with

Lasswell’s Model of Mediated Communication Who says What in Which channel to Whom with What Effect? (in what Situation and Context? )

Lasswell’s Model Example: Presidential Media Event Who: George Bush, Kim Dae-Jung What: Media Event

Lasswell’s Model Example: Presidential Media Event Who: George Bush, Kim Dae-Jung What: Media Event Which channel: Whitehouse Webpage to Whom: American public with What Effect: Positive PR for Bush’s international program in what Situation: Goodwill trip and Context: War with Iraq; Tenserelations with North Korea

Extensions of Lasswell n Technological Determinism (Mc. Luhan): “The medium is the message” (medium

Extensions of Lasswell n Technological Determinism (Mc. Luhan): “The medium is the message” (medium (influences) everything else) n Media Ecology Theory: TV (and other changes in media) harmful societal effects (e. g. , texting, SNS relationships? )

Symmetry (Balance) Models X A B

Symmetry (Balance) Models X A B

Symmetry (Balance) Models A B

Symmetry (Balance) Models A B

Shannon & Weaver’s “Information Theory” Model Information Source Transmitter Receiver Channel Signal Received Signal

Shannon & Weaver’s “Information Theory” Model Information Source Transmitter Receiver Channel Signal Received Signal Noise Source Destination

Shannon & Weaver’s “Information Theory” Model Example: Broadcast following crisis A television station B

Shannon & Weaver’s “Information Theory” Model Example: Broadcast following crisis A television station B TV broadcasting equipment Signal: A storm! C Circuitry, waves Received Signal: A storm! Noise Source: Storm damages TV equipment; static from storm in reception D TV sets; E viewing public

Schramm’s Model Field of experience Encoder Field of experience Message Interpreter Encoder Interpreter Message

Schramm’s Model Field of experience Encoder Field of experience Message Interpreter Encoder Interpreter Message Decoder

Schramm’s Model Example: Broadcast Reporting (medical) Field of experience: Limited medical experience Field of

Schramm’s Model Example: Broadcast Reporting (medical) Field of experience: Limited medical experience Field of experience: Expertise in medical field Encoder Message Interpreter Encoder Interpreter Message Decoder

Hall’s Circuit of Culture Representation Identity Regulation Consumption Production

Hall’s Circuit of Culture Representation Identity Regulation Consumption Production

Hall’s Circuit of Culture Example: Abercrombie & Fitch advertisement

Hall’s Circuit of Culture Example: Abercrombie & Fitch advertisement

Representation: The image Regulation: None Consumption: Purchasing Identity: People’s association in mind--stylish, sexy Production:

Representation: The image Regulation: None Consumption: Purchasing Identity: People’s association in mind--stylish, sexy Production: For certain outlets