History of Physical Science Francis Bacon The Father
History of Physical Science Francis Bacon: The Father of Empiricism “I come to set forth the true way for the interpretation of nature”. Bacon Takes on the Classics Bacon’s goal in the Novum Organum was twofold: to point out the shortcomings of the contemporary method of discovery and propose an alternative. Bacon’s criticism attacked three kinds of “false philosophies”: the Sophistical, the Empirical, and the Superstitious. Michael Brannick and Sean Mc. Cloat Advisors: Joe Cope, James Mc. Lean, Gary Towsley Aristotle embodied the Sophistical: “For he had come to his conclusion before; he did not consult experience, as he should have done, for the purpose of framing his decisions and axioms, but having first determined the question according to his will, he then resorts to experience, and bending her into conformity with his placets”. In contrast, Bacon praised the Pre-Socratic philosophers over Aristotle because they conducted their speculations only after making (often limited) observations of nature. Influences Bacon was a firm believer in the view that natural philosophy should create practical benefits for society. This viewpoint was similar to the ideas of contemporary occultists, who wanted to use nature for practical ends. Bacon was especially interested in natural magic, which intended to manipulate nature in order to reap practical benefits. Bacon likely read the works of Giambattista Della Porta, a widely published contemporary natural magician whose work was concerned with understanding natural phenomena through replicable experimentation. Della Porta’s methods, which were typical of early modern alchemists and other natural magicians, were very similar to Bacon’s experimental methods. During the years when Bacon was developing his method, he was also involved in the English legal system. Bacon was especially interested in the philosophy of law, and many of his thoughts on natural philosophy can be related to concepts he formulated on legal philosophy. Bacon criticized the Empirical philosopher who, although willing to amass information through observation and experimentation, made the mistake of “having bestowed much diligent and careful labor on a few experiments, have thence made bold to educe and construct systems, wresting all other facts in a strange fashion to conformity therewith. ” The language that Bacon used to describe his inductive method was almost wholly drawn from legal philosophy. Most outstanding was Bacon’s Novum Organum application of the word “fact” to situations of natural philosophy. Before Francis Bacon’s proposed alternative to these flawed systems of Bacon, the phrase “matter of fact” was a legal term used to refer to the judicial knowledge was a method of induction. The first step of his method process by which an event or situation can be proven true through eyewitness By the Superstitious, Bacon meant the mixing of divine and was to identify a natural phenomenon to investigate. From there, testimonies and the presentation of evidence in court. Bacon applied this supernatural causes with the predictable processes of nature. The created a “unwholesome mixture of things human and divine” which led one develops three lists, or tables about that phenomenon. These concept to natural philosophy, asserting that eyewitness observations of tables are: to “a fantastic philosophy [and] also a heretical religion. ” controlled experiments could establish true facts about natural phenomena. In this way, facts of nature would be defined as natural events or circumstances These errors of contemporary philosophy were a species of Idols of the Table of Essence and Presence: Every instance in which a natural which could be corroborated by a first-hand testimony. The practice of natural Theater: “And in the plays of this philosophical theater you may observe phenomenon occurs. philosophy, in other words, should follow the methodology utilized by lawyers Table of Absence in Proximity: Instances in which the phenomenon and judges in a courtroom. Bacon is directly attributed with appropriating the same thing which is found in theater of the poets, that stories invented for the stage are more compact and elegant, and more as one does not occur. Should be limited to instances similar to those in word fact from the fields of law (and history) and bringing it into the English the first table. would wish them to be, than true stories out of history. ” scientific revolution which occurred after his death. Table of Degrees: A ranking of the degrees at which the phenomenon occurs in different circumstances. “Human knowledge and human power meet in one; for where Legacy of Bacon After the creation of these three tables, one compares them and Francis Bacon wanted Man’s power to rise through the attainment and eliminates any occurrences which would not be the true form of the cause is not known the accumulation of knowledge. He saw the future of man being a utopia natural phenomenon. Bacon’s goal was to discover the true natural effect cannot be produced. ” of technology and practical invention, all working to improve us as we laws governing phenomena. Once these true forms were improved them. understood, these natural phenomena’s effects could be replicated at will and be used for practical means. While the Baconian method is not used today, his mark upon how we conduct science today is unmistakable. His emphasis on the authority Baconian Method Applied to Heat of experience and observation of nature in order to discover laws – Presence Absence Degrees Conclusion essentially empiricism – has lasted through the centuries. Sunlight Fire Lightning Lava Boiling Water Live Animals Bacon’s Novum Organum, which introduced his inductive method The Advancement of Learning and The New Atlantis Moonlight Starlight St. Elmo’s fire Dead animals Sun at Sunlight gives zenith>Sun off heat, as below zenith does boiling water; but Birds>animals. boiling water >fish does not give off light. Therefore, visible light is not the true form of heat Bacon used heat as an example of a natural phenomenon that could be examined with the inductive method. This example is taken from Novum Organum. Indeed, Bacon’s criticisms and admonitions of his contemporaries are as timeless as they are timely in modern science – to beware of the Idols and biases we may project into nature, and to remain objective in our pursuit of truth. Works Cited Bacon, Francis. Novum Organum. Constitution Society. Web. 20 Mar. 2012. <http: //www. constitution. org/bacon/nov_org. htm>. Preston, Claire. Thomas Browne and the Writing of Early Modern Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 2005. Print. Shapin, Steven. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994. Print. Shapiro, Barbara J. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550 -1720. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2000. Print. Solomon, Julie Robin. Objectivity in the Making: Francis Bacon and the Politics of Inquiry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1998. Print. Zagorin, Perez. Francis Bacon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1998. Print.
- Slides: 1