High Energy Spin Physics Theory Overview Hiroyuki Kawamura

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
High Energy Spin Physics: Theory Overview Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) RHIC/PHENIX spin-workshop Sep. 16, 2010

High Energy Spin Physics: Theory Overview Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) RHIC/PHENIX spin-workshop Sep. 16, 2010 @SNU Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 1

Introduction l Main goal of high energy spin physics ─ Explore the spin structure

Introduction l Main goal of high energy spin physics ─ Explore the spin structure of nucleon at the high energy scale. ─ Understand the spin aspects of strong interaction in terms of QCD. l Theoretical framework: Perturbative QCD “factorization” ‘ ex. PP→ h. X (unpol. ) : partonic cross section (perturbatively calculable) : parton distirbution function (PDF) : fragmentation function (FF) • Justify the description by naïve parton model. Field & Feynman (‘ 76) • PDF, FF process-indep. (“universal”) → Predictive power of QCD. • PDF reflects the internal structure of proton. Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 2

To be more precise, , , High-PT hadron production ─ PDF. FF depends on

To be more precise, , , High-PT hadron production ─ PDF. FF depends on the “factorization scale” , which is the scale where perturbative and nonperturbative regions are separated. DGLAP eq. Space-like splitting function Time-like splitting function ─ ISR, FSR, colour neutralization etc affect only power-suppressed terms. ( “Higher twist effect”, beyond the parton model) cf. Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 3

l Universality naturally comes from factorization procedure. ● Collinear singularity arises from interactions that

l Universality naturally comes from factorization procedure. ● Collinear singularity arises from interactions that happen a long-time ago before the hard scattering of partons. → PDFs obtained via factorization are process-independent. ● “Universality” of PDFs guarantees the predictive power of p. QCD. → PDFs determined by experiment or lattice simulation can be used to predict other obserbavles. Operator definitions of quark & gluon PDF gauge link 4

NLO vs. RHIC data PHENIX data vs. NLO p. QCD Power suppressed corrections (cannot

NLO vs. RHIC data PHENIX data vs. NLO p. QCD Power suppressed corrections (cannot be factorized) are negligible even at 1 Ge. V? . 5

Spin Physics • The above discussion is common for both pol. & unpol. cross

Spin Physics • The above discussion is common for both pol. & unpol. cross sections. Question: What’s interesting in Spin Physics? Isn’t the pol. sector of QCD simply a carbon copy of the unpol. sector of QCD as , , etc. ? Answer: No. ─ gamma_5 in D-dimension, axial anomaly, “weak charge” → g 1(x, Q 2) in p. DIS ─ In the spin asymmetry. the higher-twist contributions can appear at the leading power. →. g 2(x, Q 2), TF(x, x) in SSA ─ Chirality flip, T-odd, P-odd. → Transversity, W production etc. ─ Direction of the spin vector can be off the scattering plane, which provides a “new dimension” to the process. → variety of TMDs. Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 6

Proton helicity structure Long. p. DIS Weak decay + SU(3) flavour symmetry Bj. Sum

Proton helicity structure Long. p. DIS Weak decay + SU(3) flavour symmetry Bj. Sum rule EMC’ 88 “spin crisis” negative Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) ? 7

Proton helicity structure Anomaly Adler-Bardeen scheme scale indep. to all orders (physical? ) Large

Proton helicity structure Anomaly Adler-Bardeen scheme scale indep. to all orders (physical? ) Large ∆G needed ! Altarelli, Ross (88), Ball, Forte, Ridolfi (96) Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 8

Gluon polarization RHIC + dijet, dihadron, etc. HERMES, COMPASS Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 9

Gluon polarization RHIC + dijet, dihadron, etc. HERMES, COMPASS Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 9

Global Analysis De Florian, Sassot, Stratmann, Vogelsang (’ 08) DSSV 08 : First global

Global Analysis De Florian, Sassot, Stratmann, Vogelsang (’ 08) DSSV 08 : First global analysis using DIS, SIDIS, RHIC data. by SIDIS data Pauli principle? Broken SU(3) Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) Large extrapolation error 10

Global Analysis Kumano, Hirai (’ 08) KH 08 : Set A DIS only, Set

Global Analysis Kumano, Hirai (’ 08) KH 08 : Set A DIS only, Set B (DIS + RHIC pi 0) No node. Dependence on functional form? Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 11

W measurement l RHIC 500 Ge. V : Flavor separation via P-odd asymmetry Forward

W measurement l RHIC 500 Ge. V : Flavor separation via P-odd asymmetry Forward Backward ─ The idea is simple and clear, but it is difficult to “measure” W-boson. De Florian, Vogelsang (‘ 10) NLO QCD corr. • QT resummation not so relevant. • Z/gamma contribution slightly reduces asymmetry (20%). Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 12

W measurement PHENIX ar. Xiv: 1009. 0505 Electron from STAR ar. Xiv: 1009. 0326

W measurement PHENIX ar. Xiv: 1009. 0505 Electron from STAR ar. Xiv: 1009. 0326 Electron from Hiroyuki Kawamura (KEK) 13