Headquarters U S Air Force Integrity Service Excellence

Headquarters U. S. Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence DAU Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition Discussion B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program (CERP) Abbigail Pogorzelski AFLCMC/WWD 3 April 2019 Integrity - Service - Excellence

Section 804 Middle Tier Acquisition Rapid Prototyping & Fielding • • FY 16 National Defense Authorization Act Section 804 Authority • Rapid Prototyping—fielded demo within 5 years • Rapid Fielding—production in 6 months, fielding in 5 years • Can be combined and applied to any program What does Section 804 allow us to do? • • Shave years off programs Streamline metrics, decisions, and reporting to match the program Take risk and explore options in prototyping to limit risk in fielding What we will NOT do with Section 804 • Sacrifice quality or discipline • • Skip essential reviews • • Speed will require even greater rigor We are accountable for these programs Keep information to ourselves • Will generate tri-annual reports to congress for all 804 s CERP executing under Rapid Prototyping Authority Integrity - Service - Excellence 2 2

Sec. 804 Middle Tier Applicability SEC. 804. MIDDLE TIER OF ACQUISITION FOR RAPID PROTOTYPING AND RAPID FIELDING (b) Acquisition Pathways (1) Rapid Prototyping The rapid prototyping pathway shall provide for the use of innovative st 21 century technologies to rapidly develop fieldable prototypes to demonstrate new on 20 th century a/c Improved Fuel Efficiency, Power Generation & capabilities and meet emerging military needs. The objective of an acquisition B-52 fleet sustainment to 2050+ Engine Reliability program under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be Deliver virtual and physical prototypes demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual Demonstration through M&S and physical testing with test report virtual DE model & operational capability within five years of the development of an approved modified AFGSC A/C requirement. virtual Prototype: 2 years physical Prototype: 4. 5 years Section 804 is applicable to the B-52 CERP Integrity - Service - Excellence 3

Program Overview System Description B 52 Re-Engine Overview Digital Engine Controls & Displays • Compatible, nuclear hardened electronics • Higher reliability • • Redesigned Engine Pod • New strut • Modified nacelle Quick Start Capability • On-Aircraft power generation • • Maintain quick starting capability Reduced ground support equipment Gearbox • New electrical power generator • More reliable pumps • • Significantly reduced sustainment cost Enhanced mission and troubleshooting capability Accommodate future electrical needs Lowered support cost • • • Minimal airframe modifications Maintain weapons separation Simplified engine change Modified Pneumatics System • Higher efficiency precoolers • Modern, Commercially-Based Engine • Similar size, thrust, weight • High reliability • Commercially-based • Higher bypass • • • Reduced cost Existing supply chain Reduced fuel consumption, noise and emission Increased cooling capacity & flow Legend Feature Benefit Integrity - Service - Excellence 4

Prototype Definitions virtual Power Pod Prototype (v. PPP) virtual System Prototype (v. SP) v. PPP SUBSYSTEM MODELS Digital visual representation of the physical characteristics of the CERP power pod based on engineering modeling and other analysis MBSE DIGITAL VISUALIZATION Digital visual representation of the physical and functional characteristics of the CERP modification based on mathematical and physical modeling, simulations and other analysis physical System Prototype (p. SP) B-52 H aircraft with the CERP modification installed Integrity - Service - Excellence 5

Program Deliverables “The objective of an acquisition program under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual operational capability within five years of the development of an approved requirement. ” Phase Deliverable Rapid virtual Prototype (RP Spiral 1) Rapid physical Prototype (RP Spiral 2) Fielding virtual Power Pod Prototype modified B-52 aircraft (physical System Prototype) Production configuration modified B-52 aircraft IT-4 (initial flight test, includes operational assessment) IT-5 (performance flight test) and IOT&E demonstration AFGSC can perform some missions (Partially Mission Capable) AFGSC can perform all missions (Fully Mission Capable) virtual System Prototype Demonstration Method Residual Operational Capability IT-1 (Modeling and Simulation) - Start training planning MX procedures planning Populate LCOM Sustaining Engineering Reusable MBSE Prototyping delivers incremental operational capability to warfighter Integrity - Service - Excellence 6

Engine Analysis & Engine Contract (FAR 12) Government Lead Source Selection 2 nd Step Informed by 1 st Step Engine Analysis Step 2 Step 1 Engine Selection Propulsion Directorate Other Transactional Agreement (OTA) Consortium Exit Criteria Integration Analysis Report Virtual Power POD Prototype (v. PPP) NOTE: Engine Vendors partner with Boeing Detailed Proposal Candidate Engines Entrance Criteria Size, Weight, Thrust New In-production Best Value Evaluation (FAR 12) Evaluation Factors Price Technical Integration Risk waive Past Performance Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Selected vendor Engine Production Contract with 1 Vendor 20 RP engines + production ordering periods (Up to 8 lots) New Single-Award ID/IQ (FPEPA) 17 year Po. P Multiple Agreement Awards (FFP) Integrity - Service - Excellence 7

Program Phases Rapid virtual Prototype (Rv. P) Phase (2 yrs) Rapid physical Prototype (Rp. P) Phase (4 ½ yrs) Fielding Phase A c h i e v e m e n t Affordability and market research complete Approved acquisition strategy using 804 Requirements adequately defined to begin design/prototyping Ready to enter engine source selection R i s k Perform candidate engines analysis Identify technical risks Create digital fit/form CATIA™ model of one dual high bypass engine pod + nacelle (virtual fly-off) Early test strategy planning I n d i c a t o r s : Design is mature enough to begin modification of prototype aircraft B u r n - d o w n Government-led engine source selection: downselect to 1 engine Subsystem design/test Create digital fit/form CATIA™ system model* *Deliver virtual system prototype (end of Rv. P phase) Buy H/W for test aircraft Full-scale pod testing The prototype successfully demonstrated a residual operational capability in an operational environment The program is ready for initial production A c t i o n s : Modify AFGSC Operational aircraft for physical Prototype testing Perform ground and initial logistics and integrated flight testing (focus on safety of flight) Complete integrated flight testing on prototype aircraft Purchase long-lead items for first production lot Integrity - Service - Excellence Modify the first eight production aircraft Conduct Operational Test & Evaluation 8

Test Strategy Aligned to Program Phases Rapid virtual Prototype (Rv. P) Phase (2 yrs) Test Planning § Initiate Integrated Test Team and approve ITT Charter § Support engine source selection & evaluation § Refine test strategy based on engine selection § Begin Integrated Test Master Plan (ITMP) § Identify major test risks Rapid physical Prototype (Rp. P) Phase (4 ½ yrs) IT #1: DE Model § CFD - distortion patterns § Table-top assessment of performance, HSI, R&M § Wind tunnel (5% model) IT#2: Full-scale Pod Test § Dual high bypass engine pod testing (w/full scale wind tunnel testing) § Installed engine performance, maintenance & fuel consumption § Validate CFD (nacelle/pylon correlation) Other Test Activities § System integration § System instrumentation § Cybersecurity IT#3: Ground Testing § Instrumentation checkout, systems integration, ground handling and taxi, EMIC § M-demo § Suitability (R&M) § CVPA IT#4: Safety of Flight § Phase 1 Flight Testing safety, airworthiness, nominal system functions § Suitability (R&M, training, etc) § Mix of test pilots and operational test pilots § Test report to support completion of Rapid physical prototype phase IT#5: Performance Characterization Fielding Phase IOT&E (notional COIs) § COI 1: Global Mission § Phase 2 Flight Testing Employment envelope expansion & ‾ Long/Short duration performance data ‾ Training/Nuclear/ § Complete airworthiness Conventional § All-weather testing ‾ Quick start/Cold weather § Suitability (R&M, training) ops § Operational ‾ Unprepared field a/c turn representative sorties § COI 2: Suitability § Enroute operations, ‾ Training mission planning & OPS ‾ TOs analysis ‾ Mission Planning § Full scale validation of ‾ Maintainability CFD & other digital models ‾ Deployability § Updated Test Report prior to Lot 1 modification Successful IT will make IOT&E an operational demonstration Integrity - Service - Excellence 9

Notional Program Schedule ASP: Acquisition Strategy Panel H/W: Hardware ITMP: Integrated Test Master Plan PDR: Preliminary Design Review SRR: System Requirements Review DE: Digital Engineering IOC: Initial Operational Capability ITT: Integrated Test Team PRR: Production Readiness Review SVR: System Verification Review FCA: Cull Configuration Audit IOT&E: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation MDD: Materiel Development Decision p. SP: Phsycial System Prototype TRR: Test Readiness Review FOC: Full Operational Capability IT: Integrated Test PCA: Physical Configuration Audit SFR: System Functional Review v. PPP: Virtual Power Pod Prototype v. SP: Virtual System Prototype FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ Q QQQ 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 In-Progress Reviews MDD 804/ASP RP Dev 1 Sys Req Airframe FOC Rapid Prototype Dev 2 Engine Contract 20 Analysis Engines IOC H/W Buy Deliveries Installs Production ICS Technical Reviews SRR SFR CDR PDR TRR/SVR/FCA Install 1 Prototypes v. PPP v. SP A/C Kits 1 ITMP Testing p. SP 1 p. SP 2 Install IOT&E ITMP Test Reports IT#1: DE Model IT#2 Sub-System Testing, Integration & Instrumentation Rapid virtual Prototype PCA Integrated Test Phase – Ctr/Gov DT & OT Test Planning Phase ITTs Kick-Off PRR IT#3 IT#4 IT#5 Ground Flight (Safety) Flight (Performance) Rapid Fielding/Production & Deployment Phase Rapid physical Prototype Integrity - Service - Excellence 10 10

Schedule Comparison Traditional MDAP vs. Rapid Prototyping FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ Q QQQ 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Milestones MDD MS-A IOC MS-B DRFPRD LRIP Engine Spec Dev Integ Contract (PDR) Contracts T&E SS Ph 1 FY 2017 FY 2018 EMD Integrator Contract Engine SS Engine Contract (20 EMD/Prod Ordering Periods) 2366 cert (+ 9 mos) ASP: Acquisition Strategy Panel MDD: Materiel Development Decision Prot. (+ 24 mos) OTA: Other Transaction Authority SS: Source Selection FY 2019 FY 2020 FRP FY 2021 FY 2022 1 2 PDR: Preliminary Design Review SFR: System Functional Review FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Test (+6 mos) DT/OT FY 2026 v. PPP: Virtual Power Pod Prototype p. SP: Physical System Prototype v. SP: Virtual System Prototype FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ Q QQQ 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 In Progress Reviews MDD H/W Buy Decision 804/ASP Prototypes v. PPP Sys Reqt Contracts T&E SS Ph 1 p. SP 2 v. SP RP 1 Engine SS Test Planning Phase FOC IOC Rapid Prototype Dev 2 Engines (20 RP) LRIP FRP (trade space available for Rapid Fielding) LRIP FRP Integrated Test Phase – Ctr/Gov DT & OT Integrity - Service - Excellence 11