Headquarters U S Air Force Integrity Service Excellence

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Headquarters U. S. Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence Joint Basing Overview Lt

Headquarters U. S. Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence Joint Basing Overview Lt Col Balzano AF/A 7 CIB 25 Feb 10 1

Roadmap n BRAC n Joint Basing Overview n Guidance/Framework n Joint Management Oversight Structure

Roadmap n BRAC n Joint Basing Overview n Guidance/Framework n Joint Management Oversight Structure n Installation Support Functions n Supplemental Guidance for Facilities Integrity - Service - Excellence 2

BRAC & Joint Basing n Pre BRAC - Separate Military Departments providing similar installation

BRAC & Joint Basing n Pre BRAC - Separate Military Departments providing similar installation support at bases in close proximity n BRAC Recommendation 146 n n Realign 26 bases into 12 joint bases with one Military Department assigned as the lead for installation support at each location Legal requirement to implement Joint Basing no later than September 15, 2011 Integrity - Service - Excellence 3

BRAC 2005 - Joint Basing Requires realignment of 26 installations to establish 12 Joint

BRAC 2005 - Joint Basing Requires realignment of 26 installations to establish 12 Joint Bases by 2011 n “Realign (base A) by relocating the installation management functions to (base B), establishing Joint Base (A-B) …” -- HQ & Support Activities Joint Cross-Service Group n Sec. Def Justification recommends transfer of functions to Lead n “… the Department anticipates transferring responsibility for all other Base Operating Support (BOS) functions and the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) portion of Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM), to the designated receiving location. ” n Supports the need for common definitions and standards for delivery of Installation Services n Requires flexibility in implementation guidance for local requirements n Ensure the current guidance will not impact command imperatives of our warfighting capabilities n “…the Department requires flexibility to tailor implementation to the unique requirements at each location. ” -- HQ & Support Activities Joint Cross-Service Group n Integrity - Service - Excellence 4

Joint Basing Overview n n Preserve and Enhance Warfighting Capabilities Optimal Delivery of Installation

Joint Basing Overview n n Preserve and Enhance Warfighting Capabilities Optimal Delivery of Installation Support n Partnership n Business transformation n Joint Base Commander (JBC) responsible for delivery of all installation support n Authority, personnel, funding, and real property aligned n Joint Management Oversight Structure provides oversight n Joint Base Partnership Council n Intermediate Command Summit n Senior Installation Management Group n Installations Capability Council n Common Framework n Implementation Guidance n Common Output Level Standards n Cost and Performance Visibility Framework Integrity - Service - Excellence 5

Joint Basing Implementation Guidance (JBIG) n Signed Jan 22, 2008 by DEPSECDEF n FOC

Joint Basing Implementation Guidance (JBIG) n Signed Jan 22, 2008 by DEPSECDEF n FOC accomplished when TOA, real property accountability, & personnel transferred to the lead Military Department (Supporting Component) n 2 -phased approach n Defines 49 installation support functions that will transfer – Uses 267 Common Output Level Standards (COLS) as performance standards for installation support functions Phase II Phase I Event No Later Than Memorandum of Agreements (MOAs) signed Completed Initial Operational Capability (IOC) Completed Full Operational Capability (FOC) Completed Memorandum of Agreements (MOAs) signed Completed Initial Operational Capability (IOC) Completed Full Operational Capability (FOC) Integrity - Service - Excellence Oct 1, 2010 6

Joint Basing Implementation Guidance (JBIG) n Joint Basing Implementation Guidance defines/directs: n Transfer of

Joint Basing Implementation Guidance (JBIG) n Joint Basing Implementation Guidance defines/directs: n Transfer of installation support functions n Transfer of installation support civilian personnel to the Lead n Establishment of a Joint Base Commander n Use of common output level standards (COLS) n Real property transfer n Total obligation authority (TOA) resource transfer n Management oversight structure n Sub-working Groups (incl. HAF Functional SMEs) developed supplemental guidance and COLS Integrity - Service - Excellence 7

Joint Basing PHASE 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Navy AFB + NAF Washington

Joint Basing PHASE 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Navy AFB + NAF Washington = Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington Andrews Lead AFB + Ft Dix + NAES Lakehurst = Joint Base Mc. Guire-Dix-Lakehurst Mc. Guire NAB Little Creek + Ft Story = Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story Naval Base Guam + Andersen AFB = Joint Region Marianas Army Ft Myer + Henderson Hall = Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Lead PHASE 2 6. Charleston AFB + NWS Charleston = Joint Base Charleston 7. Elmendorf AFB + Ft Richardson = Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 8. Lackland AFB + Randolph AFB + Ft Sam Houston = Joint Base San Antonio 9. Langley AFB + Ft Eustis = Joint Base Langley-Eustis 10. Anacostia Annex + Bolling AFB = Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling 11. NS Pearl Harbor + Hickam AFB = Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 12. Ft Lewis + Mc. Chord AFB = Joint Base Lewis-Mc. Chord Lead Component will be responsible for providing Installation Support for the entire Joint Base or Region Integrity - Service - Excellence 8

Joint Basing Installation Support Functions • • • • • • Airfield Ops Child

Joint Basing Installation Support Functions • • • • • • Airfield Ops Child & Youth Services Command Management Installation Public Affairs Legal Support Financial Management Analysis Procurement Operations Installation Safety Installation Chaplain Ministries Installation History & Museums Custodial Services Emergency Management Environmental Compliance Environmental Conservation Environmental P 2 Environmental Restoration Facilities Demolition Facilities New Footprint Facilities Restoration & Modernization Facilities Sustainment Family Housing Services Fire Protection & Emergency Services Grounds Maintenance & Landscaping • • • • • • Info Technology Services Management Lodging Military Personnel Services Morale, Welfare & Recreation Base Support Vehicles & Equipment Installation Movement Unaccompanied Personnel Housing Services Utilities Warfighter & Family Services Pavement Clearance Services Pest Control Services Port Services Readiness Engineering Services Real Property Management & Engineering Services Real Property Leases Refuse Collection & Disposal Installation Law Enforcement Ops Installation Physical Security Protect & Services Installation Protection Support Small Arms Range Management Supply Storage & Dist (Munitions) Supply Storage & Dist (Non-Munitions) Laundry & Dry Cleaning Food Services Integrity - Service - Excellence 9

Joint Basing Definitions for Supporting, Supported, & Tenant Supporting (Lead Component) BRAC decision Supported

Joint Basing Definitions for Supporting, Supported, & Tenant Supporting (Lead Component) BRAC decision Supported (All other Mil. Dep Components) Tenants • Non-Do. D organizations • Do. D Agencies • Do. D Activities • Army National Guard • Air National Guard • Working Capital Fund organizations Any Military Department organization previously treated as a tenant will be classified as part of the supporting or supported Component Integrity - Service - Excellence 10

Joint Basing Definitions TOA and Real Property Transfer Supported Total Obligation Authority (All other

Joint Basing Definitions TOA and Real Property Transfer Supported Total Obligation Authority (All other Mil. Dep Components) Real Property Accountability Supporting (Lead Component) Tenants Reimbursement Transfer of real property and total obligation authority from supported Components to the supporting Component to occur prior to full operational capability Integrity - Service - Excellence 11

Supplemental Guidance for Facilities n Facilities Investment Supplemental Guidance n Provides guidance for TOA

Supplemental Guidance for Facilities n Facilities Investment Supplemental Guidance n Provides guidance for TOA transfer and defines responsibilities for SRM and new construction n Sustainment – TOA transfer equals the percentage of the requirement generated by the current version of the Do. D Facilities Sustainment Model (FSM) established by Do. D programming Guidance n Current guidance is to fund sustainment at 90% of the requirement generated by the model Integrity - Service - Excellence 12

Supplemental Guidance for Facilities n Restoration & Modernization – No consistently applied methodology used

Supplemental Guidance for Facilities n Restoration & Modernization – No consistently applied methodology used by the various components; n n Supporting component is responsible for all installation support facilities and common infrastructure…for all other facilities, the component generating the modernization requirement is responsible for modernization MILCON – The Supporting Component’s design and construction agent shall be used for all military construction at the Joint Base Integrity - Service - Excellence 13

Questions? Integrity - Service - Excellence 14

Questions? Integrity - Service - Excellence 14