Hanford Site Longterm Stewardship Hanford LongTerm Stewardship LTS

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Hanford Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Boyd Hathaway Realty Officer Department of

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Hanford Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Boyd Hathaway Realty Officer Department of Energy – Richland Operations Office November 2010

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship

Shrinking the Cleanup Footprint at Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Percentage Remaining to Clean

Shrinking the Cleanup Footprint at Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Percentage Remaining to Clean 100% 75% 41% 34% 28% 13% The Inner Area will require long-term waste management activities. 2% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Completion Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152020 2015 2020

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Unique LTS challenges faced at Hanford • Significant amount of

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Unique LTS challenges faced at Hanford • Significant amount of the active cleanup accomplished by 2015 – Transition to Legacy Management (LM) ~2054 • Size of the site • Multiple cleanup contracts • Ongoing activities 6

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Reduction 7

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Reduction 7

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Reduction • By 2015 – Less than 75 sq

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Footprint Reduction • By 2015 – Less than 75 sq miles remain under active cleanup – 290 sq miles managed by USFW – Remaining 220 sq miles in some form of LTS • LTS responsibility follows cleanup 8

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Closure Project Comparison Site Size (Sq mi) Waste Sites Mound

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Closure Project Comparison Site Size (Sq mi) Waste Sites Mound . 5 73 Fernald 1. 6 9* Rocky Flats 10 360 Hanford River Corridor 220 814 *3 silos/6 waste pits 9

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Contract challenges • Three unique contracts under Richland Operations Office

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Contract challenges • Three unique contracts under Richland Operations Office – Mission Support Alliance - responsible for LTS – Washington Closure – River Corridor cleanup – CH 2 M Hill Plateau Remediation – Central Plateau cleanup • Working to align the new LTS program requirements and activities into existing programs and contracts 10

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Other Activities • September 1999 – Hanford Comprehensive Land Use

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Other Activities • September 1999 – Hanford Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision (DOE/EIS-022 -F) was issued • Land-use for research and development (19 -sq miles) • Land use for industrial (50 -sq miles 11

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Hanford LTS Program • Developed Hanford LTS Program Plan •

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Hanford LTS Program • Developed Hanford LTS Program Plan • Defines the “What/When” and “Who” • Defines the responsibilities 12

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Developing Transition Strategy • Beginning with the end in mind

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Developing Transition Strategy • Beginning with the end in mind – Developing turnover package template • CD 4 criteria • LM Transition Framework • Lessons learned from Rocky Flats, Fernald & Mound – Actively working with LM to align requirements (e. g. , records management) 13

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Information Management • LTS aligned with Hanford Site Information Management

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Information Management • LTS aligned with Hanford Site Information Management Strategy • LTS working closely with LM – Align record schedules and indexing – Lessons learned 14

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Conclusion • Working closely with Legacy Management • Incorporating lessons

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Conclusion • Working closely with Legacy Management • Incorporating lessons learned • Institutionalizing LTS at the Hanford Site • More information available at http: //www. hanford. gov/page. cfm/Long Term. Stewardship 15

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Backup Slides 16

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Backup Slides 16

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Cleanup & LTS Responsibilities 17

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Cleanup & LTS Responsibilities 17

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship LTS Responsibilities Who What/ When Richland Operations Office Cleanup River

Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship LTS Responsibilities Who What/ When Richland Operations Office Cleanup River Corridor & Central Plateau Responsibilities River Corridor and Central Plateau § Perform cleanup actions § Define long-term requirements Surveillance & Maintenance Mission Support River Corridor & Central Plateau DOE Office of Legacy Manageme nt (LM) Mission Support LM § Accept responsibility for interim S&M activities § Accept responsibility for LTS activities § Manage LTS records § Accept responsibility for LTS activities for the entire Site § Request funding for LTS § Perform LTS § When cleanup is complete for the entire Site, prepare the Site for transition to the DOE Office of Legacy Management (DOE-LM) § Manage LTS records § Perform S&M* § Maintain cleanup documentation and records River Corridor and Central Plateau § Estimate life-cycle costs § Complete remaining cleanup actions to final RODs § Transfer interim S&M responsibility (for cleanup completed under interim RODS) LTS § Transfer LTS S&M responsibility for completed cleanup (under final RODS) § Perform LTS § Request funding for LTS * The operations and maintenance for groundwater extraction and treatment systems that are determined to be operational and functional may be conducted by the LTS Program even before remedial objectives are complete. 18