HABEMUS SUPERSTRAT UM MASAKI SHIGEMORI YITP Kyoto Strings
HABEMUS SUPERSTRAT UM MASAKI SHIGEMORI (YITP Kyoto) Strings 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India June 25, 2015
MAIN MESSAGES �Black hole microstates involve complicated structure of branes called superstrata �Basic superstrata solutions explicitly constructed in sugra as smooth geometries
Iosif Bena Jan de Boer Stefano Giusto Rodolfo Russo Nick Warner
MICROSTATE GEOMETRY PROGRAM: no horizon, no singularity How much of black hole entropy can be accounted for by smooth, horizonless solutions of classical gravity?
SOME HISTORY 1915 Einstein: general relativity 1975 Hawking radiation 1996 Strominger-Vafa (field theory counting of 3 -charge BH) 2001 Lunin-Mathur geometries (2 -charge microstates) fuzzball conjecture, microstate geometry program 2006 Microstate geometries in 5 D (3 - and 4 -charge microstates) 2010 Double bubbling & superstrata (into 6 D)This 2015 Explicit construction of superstrata talk
DOUBLE BUBBLING (OR MULTIPLE SUPERTUBE TRANSITION)
SUPERTUBE TRANSITION [Mateos+Townsend ’ 01] new dipole charge polarize (“bubble”) arbitrary curve �Spontaneous polarization phenomenon �Produces new dipole charge �Cross section = arbitrary curve 7 (cf. Myers effect)
SUPERTUBE: F 1 -P FRAME compac t polarize F 1(9) P ers v s n tra e � 8 wiggly F 1
SUPERTUBE: D 1 -D 5 FRAME KKM D 1 D 5 polarize (“bubble”) � arbitrary curve [Lunin-Mathur ’ 01] [Rychkov ’ 05] [Lunin-Mathur ’ 01] [Kanitscheider-Skenderis-Taylor ’ 06, 07] 9
[de Boer-MS ’ 10, ’ 12] [Bena-de Boer-MS-Warner ’ 11] DOUBLE BUBBLING 3 -charge system: real BH D 1 D 5 P � 10 arbitrary curve: supertube arbitrary surface: “superstratum”
ENDLESS BUBBLING? ? A black hole is made of an extremely complicated structure (fuzzball) of puffedup branes. 7 Courtesy of the National Human Genome Research Institute
EXOTIC BRANES[de Boer-MS ’ 10, ’ 12] �“Forgotten” branes in string theory [Elitzur-Giveon-Kutasov-Rabinovici ’ 97] [Blau-O’Loughlin ’ 97] [Hull ’ 97] [Obers-Pioline ’ 98] exotic brane �Codimension 2 �U-duality monodromy (“U-fold”) �Non-geometric 12 U-duality monodromy generalization of F-theory 7 branes
A GEOMETRIC CHANNEL [Bena-de Boer -MS-Warner ’ 11] 13 D 5 P wiggly D 1 wiggly D 5 wiggly KKM = D 1 geometric superstratum
SUMMARY: �BH microstates involve double-bubbled superstrata �Geometric superstratum in 6 D is important for microstate geometry program
EXPLICIT CONSTUCTION OF SUPERSTRATA [Bena+Giusto+Russo+MS+Warner ’ 15]
GOAL: Explicitly construct “superstrata” = wiggly KKM in 6 D
SUSY SOLUTIONS IN 6 D [Gutowski+Martelli+Reall ’ 03] [Cariglia+Mac Conamhna ’ 04] [Bena+Giusto+MS+Warner ’ 11] [Giusto+Martucci+Petrini+Russo ’ 13] 17
BPS EQUATIONS 0 th layer Give 4 D base 1 st layer 2 nd layer Linear if solved in the right order 18
TH 0 LAYER Give 4 D base �This is the base for: round LM geometry (2 -charge) round superstratum with no wiggle (yet) 19
ST 1 LAYER �Take known linear solution with Give 4 D base [Mathur+Saxena+Srivastava P ’ 03] �Mode numbers: (��, �� ) 20
ST 1 LAYER (2) Give 4 D base �Superpose modes to get function of 2 variables 21
ND 2 LAYER Give 4 D base 22 NL completion
SUMMARY: �Constructive proof of existence of superstrata! Big step toward general 3 - charge microstate geometries �Most general microstate geometry with known CFT dual
CFT PICTURE
BOUNDARY CFT �Orbifold CFT Twist sectors represented by component strings 25 ………
2 -CHARGE STATES (1) �Round LM geom 26 ………
2 -CHARGE STATES (2) �Linear fluct around LM ……… �General LM geom[Lunin-Mathur ’ 01] 27 ………
KNOWN 3 -CHARGE STATES �P-carrying linear fluct around LM “known linear solution” [Mathur+Saxena+Srivastava ’ 03] 28 ………
SUPERSTRATA �General P-carrying fluct around LM … … 29 ……… …
TOWARD MORE GENERAL STRATA
WHAT’S MISSING Not yet [de Boer ’ 98] 31
MORE GENERAL SUPERSTRATA Next steps: multisuperstratum 32
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS:
STAY TUNED
Thanks!
- Slides: 36