Greening Concrete Why Green Concrete Huge impact on

Greening Concrete Ü Why Green Concrete? – Huge impact on sustainability – Most widely used material on Earth • 30% of all materials flows on the planet – 70% of all materials flows in the built environment. • > 2. 1 billion tonnes per annum. • >15 billion tonnes poured each year. • Over 2 tonnes person per annum The fine print which is there for people to read if they download the presentation from the web site Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 1

Roadmap to Greening Concrete A. Background – Emissions, contribution and production B. Options for Greening Concrete 1. Scale down production. • Untenable, especially to developing nations unless population growth also attenuated 2. Use waste for fuels • OK in some circumstances, others questionable. 3. Capture and convert CO 2 emissions to fuel and other materials • Very promising technology. 4. Reduce net emissions from manufacture • • Increase manufacturing efficiency Waste stream sequestration using Mg. O and Ca. O – E. g. Carbonating the Portlandite in waste concrete » Given the current price of carbon in Europe this could be viable Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 2

Greening Concrete 5. Increase the proportion of waste materials that are pozzolanic • Using waste pozzolanic materials such as fly ash and slags has the advantage of not only extending cement reducing the embodied energy and net emissions but also of utilizing waste. – We could run out of fly ash as coal is phasing out. (e. g. Canada) – Tec. Eco technology will encourage the use of pozzolans 6. Improve particle packing for binder minimisation and carbonation • Probably the lowest cost alternative for making a big difference. Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 3

Greening Concrete 7. Innovative New Concrete Products – Including aggregates that improve or introduce new properties reducing lifetime energies • • – – Use aggregates with lower embodied energy and that result in less emissions or are themselves carbon sinks • materials that be used to make concrete have lower embodied energies. • Materials that are non fossil carbon are carbon sinks in concrete – – – Local low impact waste aggregates Local “dirt” Recycled aggregates from building rubble Glass cullet Plastics, wood etc. Using aggregates that extend concrete • • – E. g. Including wood fibre or Hemp hurd reduces weight and conductance Phase change minerals to improve specific heat capacity Aluminium use questionable Foamed Concretes – Use for slabs to improve insulation Innovative products the reduce emissions and other impacts • Tec. Eco-Cement Porous Pavement Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 4

Greening Concrete 8. Replace or partially replace Portland cement with viable alternatives • There a number of products with similar properties to Portland cement – Carbonating Binders » Lime mixes, Eco-Cements. – Non-carbonating binders » Tec-Cements, geopolymers etc. • The research and development of these binders needs to be accelerated C. Conclusion • There is plenty of scope! Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 5

Portland Cement & Global Warming Hansen, J et. al. Climate Change and Trace Gases Ü Third largest contributor to CO 2 emissions after the energy and transportation sectors. Ü Portland cement production will reach 3. 5 billion tonnes by 2020 - a three fold increase on 1990 levels. Ü To achieve Kyoto targets the industry will have to emit less than 1/3 of current emissions per tonne of concrete. Ü Carbon taxes and other legislative changes will provide legislative incentive to change. Ü There is already strong evidence of market incentive to change Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 6

Emissions from Cement Production Ü Chemical Release (approx 50%) – The process of calcination involves driving off chemically bound CO 2 with heat. CO 2 Ca. CO 3 →Ca. O + ↑CO 2 Ü Process Energy (approx 50%) – Most energy is derived from fossil fuels. – Fuel oil, coal and natural gas are directly or indirectly burned to produce the energy required releasing CO 2. Ü The production of cement for concretes accounts for around 10% of global anthropogenic CO 2. – Pearce, F. , "The Concrete Jungle Overheats", New Scientist, 19 July, No 2097, 1997 (page 14). Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 7

The Carbon Cycle and Emissions from fossil fuels and cement production are the cause of the global warming problem Source: David Schimel and Lisa Dilling, National Centre for Atmospheric Research 2003 Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 8

Cement Production ~= Carbon Dioxide Emissions Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 9

Embodied Energy of Building Materials Concrete is relatively environmentally friendly and has a relatively low embodied energy Downloaded from www. dbce. csiro. au/indserv/brochures/embodied. htm (last accessed 07 March 2000) Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 10

Average Embodied Energy in Buildings Most of the embodied energy in the built environment is in concrete. Because so much concrete is used there is a huge opportunity for sustainability by reducing the embodied energy, reducing the carbon debt (net emissions) and improving properties that reduce lifetime energies. Downloaded from www. dbce. csiro. au/ind-serv/brochures/embodied. htm (last accessed 07 March 2000) Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 11

Concrete Industry Objectives ÜPCA (USA) – Improved energy efficiency of fuels and raw materials – Formulation improvements that: • Reduce the energy of production and minimize the use of natural resources. • Use of crushed limestone and industrial byproducts such as fly ash and blast furnace slag. ÜWBCSD – Fuels and raw materials efficiencies – Emissions reduction during manufacture Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 12

1. Scale Down Production? Ü Currently growing at around 5% a year globally. Mainly China and India. Ü GDP growth = concrete poured – Can the Asian economic boom continue? – What is Africa and South America also catch up to the western world? Ü Zero population growth? – Is really the amount of concrete we pour a measure of the welfare or wellbeing of a society? Ü Buildings and infrastructure are only being designed to last 50 not hundreds of years. – Will there be a shift to quality not quantity – If so when? Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 13

2. Use Waste for Fuels Ü Expanded use of alternative fuels is viewed by the industry as the most significant opportunity to enhance sustainability and reduce consumption of fossil fuels Ü Cement kilns are being integrated into the recycling hierarchy for some common wastes – Biomass, tires, used oils and used solvents. Ü Questionable emissions implications? Ü Do some organics have more value than as fuel? – Tyres? – Solvents that can be recycled – Oils that can be recycled Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 14

3. Capture and Convert CO 2 Emissions to Fuel Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 15

ACC Emissions to Fuel Project Ü ACC, formerly Associated Cement Companies and now part of the Holcim group have initiated a project to – Sequester CO 2 generated by cement kilns – Produce high energy algal biomass • Reused as fuel in its cement kilns. • Cellulose contents could be converted to alcohols • Protein residue could be use for animal feed Ü The project involves – – The screening of appropriate high yielding algae cultures The development of a bioreactor on a lab bench scale Scaling up the technology to a pilot plant and then Demonstrating the commercial viability. Ü This will require – A multi disciplinary approach and – Involve microbiologists, algae experts, bio-technologists, engineers and other professionals – Cost around $ 3 m over a period of 3 years. Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 16

4. Reduce Net Emissions from Manufacture Ü Increase manufacturing efficiency – Has the industry reached the point of diminishing returns? • Wet to dry process, heat exchangers etc – Combining calcination with size reduction using a new type of kiln Tec. Eco are developing may reduce energy consumption by 20 -30% • Reason - Only about 98% of the energy of grinding actually goes into cleaving minerals • Around 30% of the energy used to make cement is used for grinding Ü CO 2 capture – Calcination in an oxygen atmosphere to capture pure CO 2 • Suggested to me by a director of ACC a few weeks ago • Would make capture of CO 2 more worthwhile but cost money – Use of CO 2 for carbonation of concrete seems pointless Ü Better to have use e. g. algal bioreactor on site (See 3) Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 17

5. Increasing the Proportion of Waste Materials that are Pozzolanic Ü Advantages – Lower costs – More durable greener concrete Ü Disadvantages – Rate of strength development retarded • Resolved by Tec. Eco technology – Potential long term durability issue due to leaching of Ca from CSH. • Glasser and others have observed leaching of Ca from CSH and this will eventually cause long term unpredictable behavior of CSH. • Resolved by Tec. Eco technology – Higher water demand due to fineness. – Finishing is not as easy Ü Supported by WBCSD and virtually all industry associations Ü Driven by legislation and sentiment Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 18

Impact of Tec. Eco Tec-Cement Technology on the use of Pozzolans Ü In Tec. Eco tec-cements Portlandite is generally consumed by the pozzolanic reaction and replaced with brucite – Increase in rate of strength development particularly in the first 3 -4 days. • concrete gells more quickly and finishers can go home! – Kosmotrophic property of the magnesium ion – Change in surface charge on Mg. O – Improved durability as brucite is much less soluble or reactive • Potential long term durability issue due to leaching of Ca from CSH resolved. – Easier to finish fly ash concretes - Mg++ contributes a strong shear thinning property Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 19

6. Improve Particle Packing for Binder Minimisation and Carbonation Ü In the past, concrete proportioning was based on experience and estimates only. Ü Tec. Soft Pty. Ltd. are developing batching software, using theory from the world’s best experts (F. de Larrard and Ken Day), to optimize mix design and particularly particle packing. Ü Scientific knowledge of the concrete behaviour coupled with the use of optimization software will allow concrete technologists to: - Design more sustainable concrete - Less cement of same strength - More durable - Use secondary aggregate and mining wastes (poor size distribution) - Dramatically reduce the number of experiment needed to design a concrete for a special application Satterfield, S. G. (2001). Visualization aggregate in high performance concrete, National institute of standard and technology. (NIST) Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 20

Scientific Approach to Concrete Design Ü Optimization of particle packing will improve – The strength/cost ratio and – Concrete sustainability • Less cement for the same strength Ü Improving packing (other parameters being equal) leads to an increase of: – The compressive and tensile strength – The workability – The durability And a decrease of: – The porosity – The risk of segregation – The yield stresses (easier to compact) Ü Could help improve the skill level in the industry – An expert in the box Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 21

7. Innovative New Concrete Products Ü Room for innovation in the concrete industry – Demand for more sustainable materials Ü Need to take a more holistic view – Cementitious composites not cement Ü Barriers to innovation are – Low skill level • For innovation to occur the skill level will have to improve dramatically • This could be a government initiative – i. e require people in the industry to do an apprenticeship (as for other industries) • As part of the course work alternatives would be examined. – Formula rather than performance based standards entrench mediocrity and dogma – Better connections between market demand production and supply Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 22

Technologies that Introduce New Properties Ü Introduce new components that improve performance. – Reducing lifetime energies in use e. g. • That reduce conductance (e. g. wood fibre or hemp hurd ) • That increase specific heat capacity (e. g. phase change materials) – Reduce weight/strength ratio • Organic fibres and fillers – Many of the above components can be wastes – Improve durability • Remove lime by adding pozzolans or as in Tec-Cement concretes Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 23

Reduce Embodied Energy Ü Local low impact waste aggregates – Local “dirt” – On site excavation materials Ü Recycled aggregates from building rubble – Tec and Eco-Cements do not have problems associated with high gypsum content Ü Glass cullet fly ash, ggbfs and other industrial wastes Ü Reduce transport embodied energies by using local materials such as low impact wastes and earth – Mud bricks and adobe. – Tec. Eco research in the UK and with mud bricks in Australia indicate that eco-cement formulations seem to work much better than PC for this Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 24

Lower Net Emissions Ü Making Concretes that are carbon sinks – Eco-Cements - Addition of magnesium oxide which recarbonates with carbon capture technology – Materials that are non fossil carbon are carbon sinks in concrete • Plastics, wood etc. • Eco-Cements bond well to sawdust and other carbon based aggregates. – Many of the above components can be wastes • paper and plastic have in common reasonable tensile strength, low mass and low conductance and can be used to make cementitious composites that assume these properties Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 25

Extending Cement Ü Air used in foamed concrete is a cheap low embodied energy aggregate and has the advantage of reducing the conductance of concrete. – Concrete, depending on aggregates weighs in the order of 2350 Kg/m 3 – Concretes of over 10 mp as light as 1000 Kg/m 3 can be achieved. – At 1500 Kg/m 3 25 mpa easily achieved. Ü From our experiments so far with Build-lite Cellular Concrete PL Tec-Cement formulations increase strength performance by around 5 -10% for the same mass. Ü Claimed use of aluminium and autoclaving to make more sustainable blocks questionable? Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 26

Concrete Porous Pavements? Ü Perhaps the greenest concrete product in the world is a new porous low fines concrete that is being made using recycled aggregate and with Eco-Cements that set by absorbing CO 2 Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 27

8. Replace Portland Cement with Viable Alternatives Ü The concrete industry are in the business of selling binders – Need to get away from the “all that is grey is great, all we make goes out the gate” philosophy Ü The industry can also make money learning about and selling alternatives – Sell knowledge as well as product • Many alternatives just as suitable – The problem is in implementation • Could be difficult given the low level of skill in the industry Ü We will consider two main groups of alternative cements • Carbonating alternatives – Potentially carbon neutral of carbon sinks • Non carbonating alternatives – Some have much lower embodied energies Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 28

Replacement of PC by Calcium Based Carbonating Binders Ü Lime – The most used material next to Portland cement in binders. – Generally used on a 1: 3 (PC: Sand) paste basis since Roman times – Non-hydraulic limes set by carbonation and are therefore close to carbon neutral once set. Ca. O + H 2 O => Ca(OH)2 + CO 2 => Ca. CO 3 33. 22 + gas ↔ 36. 93 molar volumes – Very slight expansion, but shrinkage from loss of water. – Carbonates not generally fibrous so do not add as much microstructural strength as Mg cements – Do not stick to other materials as well as Mg cements. – Low long term p. H = low reactivity with wastes included Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 29

Replacement of PC with Magnesium Based Carbonating Binders Ü Eco-Cement (Tec. Eco) – Have high proportions of reactive magnesium oxide – Carbonate like lime – Generally used in a 1: 2: 18 (PC: Mg. O: Sand) paste basis because much more carbonate “binder” is produced than with lime. – Like lime are carbon neutral but take up more weight of CO 2 due to low weight of Mg Mostly CO 2 Mg. O + H 2 O <=> Mg(OH)2 and water Mg(OH)2 + CO 2 + H 2 O <=> Mg. CO 3. 3 H 2 O 58. 31 + 44. 01 <=> 138. 32 molar mass (at least!) 24. 29 + gas <=> 74. 77 molar volumes (at least!) – 307 % expansion (less water volume reduction) producing much more binder per mole of Mg. O than lime (around 8 times) and les shrinkage – Carbonates tend to be fibrous adding significant micro structural strength compared to lime – Can include a wider range of wastes • Stick well due to hydrogen bonding • Low long term p. H = low reactivity Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 30

Replacement with Non Carbonating Binders Ü There a number of other novel cements with intrinsically lower energy requirements and CO 2 emissions than conventional Portland cements that have been developed – High belite cements • Being research by Aberdeen and other universities – Calcium sulfoaluminate cements • Used by the Chinese for some time – Magnesium phosphate cements • Proponents argue that a lot stronger than Portland cement therefore much less is required. • Main disadvantage is that phosphate is a limited resource – Sorel Type Cements • Stronger and more convenient to place and use (with the appropriate know how. • Tend to break down in water – PC – Magnesia blends (Tec-Cements) – Geopolymers More research needed. I will only have time to mention geopolymers and Tec-Cements Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 31

Geopolymers Ü “Geopolymers” consists of Si. O 4 and Al. O 4 tetrahedra linked alternately by sharing all the oxygens. – Positive ions (Na+, K+, Li+, Ca++, Ba++, NH 4+, H 3 O+) must be present in the framework cavities to balance the negative charge of Al 3+ in IV fold coordination. Ü Theoretically very sustainable Ü Unlikely to be used for pre-mix concrete or waste in the near future because of. – process problems • Requiring a degree of skill for implementation – Skill level problem in the industry needs to be addressed – nano porosity • Causing problems with aggregates in aggressive environments – no p. H control strategy for heavy metals in waste streams Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 32

Tec - Cements Ü Tec-Cements (Low Mg. O) – contain more Portland cement than reactive magnesia. Reactive magnesia hydrates in the same rate order as Portland cement forming Brucite which uses up water reducing the voids: paste ratio, increasing density and possibly raising the short term p. H. – More pozzolans can be used. After all the Portlandite has been consumed Brucite controls the long term p. H which is lower and due to it’s low solubility, mobility and reactivity results in greater durability. – Other benefits include improvements in density, strength and rheology, reduced permeability and shrinkage and the use of a wider range of aggregates many of which are potentially wastes without reaction problems. Presentation downloadable from www. tececo. com 33