Grant Budgets and Budget Justifications November 2018 Rules

Grant Budgets and Budget Justifications November 2018

Rules and Regulation GOVERNING POLICIES

Financial Accountability • • Preserve public / government trust in university Avoid mismanagement of federal funds Financial stewardship of a sponsor’s resources Risk of non-financial compliance

Risks of Non-compliance • Fines and penalties – false claims act ($5, 000 - $10, 000 per false claim) • Reduced research funding • Enhances sponsor monitoring • Designation as “exceptional” or “high risk” institution • Compromise reputation • Loss of public trust

Compliance Items • • • Time and effort certification Cost transfers Direct charging clerical and administrative salaries Cost Sharing and Matching Timeliness of Report Submission

Uniform Guidance • Federal Government’s guidance on Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards • “Super Circular” combines: • A-21 Circular: determines costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions • A-110 Circular: sets forth standard for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies in the administration of grant agreements with institutions of higher education. • A-133 Circular: sets forth obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for the audit of States, local government, and non-profit organizations expending Federal awards.

What happens if we don’t? Recent Institutional Settlements • • • 2016 $9. 5 M Columbia – Inaccurate use of Indirect Cost Rate 2015 $19. 8 M U Florida –Improper use of grant funds(2005 -10) 2009 $7. 6 M Yale – Effort Reporting 2006 $2. 5 M U Connecticut – Service Center Billing Rates 2005 $4. 4 M Cornell – Grant Money Paid to Non-Research Staff 2005 $6. 5 M Mayo Clinic – Improper Cost Transfers 2005 $11. 5 M Florida International – Improper Cost Transfers 2004 $2. 4 M Harvard – Grants Billed for Unrelated Salaries 2004 $2. 6 M Johns Hopkins – Faculty Effort Reporting 2003 $5. 5 M Northwestern – Faculty Effort Reporting

Grant Cost Must Be • Allowable • Allocable • Reasonable

Allowable Costs • General Test of Allowability – Costs Must Be: • Treated consistently through generally accepted accounting principles • Reasonable • Allocable • Conform to limitations of Uniform Guidance and agreement with terms and conditions

Allocable Costs • A cost is allocable to a particular objective according to the relative benefits accrued to the objective. • Any cost allocable to a particular award or other cost objective may not be shifted to other federal awards simply to overcome funding deficiencies nor to avoid restrictions imposed by law or by the terms of the award.

Reasonable Cost • A cost is considered reasonable if the goods or services acquired, and the amount involved, reflect action that a prudent person would take under the circumstances.

Factors to Consider • Is the cost necessary for the performance of the project? • Was the cost budgeted in the proposal budget? • What laws and regulations should be considered – what are the terms and conditions of the award? • Did all individuals act with prudence and satisfy their responsibilities to both the institution and the federal government?

Examples of Unallowable Costs • • • Alcoholic beverages not part of an approved protocol Bad debts/directly associated legal costs First class air travel (usually) Product advertising Promotional items and social club memberships

Budget Principles • Most funding agencies require that a proposed budget be based on a “good faith estimate” of the anticipated costs. A person may not knowingly include false, inaccurate or misleading cost information. • What you put into the budget and justification turns into your commitment to the sponsor.

Essential Elements CONSTRUCTING A BUDGET

Direct Costs • Expenditures needed to carry out the project • Usually include: • • • Salaries and benefits Travel expenses Supplies Contractual Services Equipment Tuition

Salaries and Wages • • Principal investigator or project director Coordinator, manager Research assistant Postdoctoral fellow Graduate assistant Technician Undergraduate student

• Travel expenses – ground transportation, airfare, lodging, meals – conferences, meetings, fieldwork • Supplies – laboratory, photographic, animal care, educational/instructional • Contractual – outside lab analysis fees, rental fees, shipping, training, testing, honoraria (non-NMU employees)

• Subawards – portions of a budget for cost of project activities carried out by others at another institution or agency • Equipment – typically items over $5, 000 (laboratory, office, medical, audio-visual)

F&A/Indirect Costs/Overhead • Indirect costs are University operating expenditures incurred for common objectives which are not allocated to a specific project. • Examples: Facilities (labs, offices, etc. ), administrative services (purchasing, personnel, accounting, pre-award services, postaward project management, maintenance, utilities, dept. office expenses. • NMU’s rate: 34. 5% of salaries, wages, fringe

Types of Cost Share • Mandatory – required condition of award • Voluntary Committed – offered, excess of mandatory, not a condition to be considered for the award

Possible Sources of Cost Share • • Employee time, including fringe benefits Graduate assistants, undergraduate students Equipment Volunteer time or other contributed items Unrecovered F&A Subrecipient cost-sharing Directly related supplies and services Travel

Adding it all up SAMPLE BUDGET

Project Expenses • Principal Investigator – Prof. Plum – 20% time ($50, 000 annual salary) • 1 Graduate Research Assistant • Travel 3 trips at $2, 000 each • Supplies: $8, 800 • Flowers for grant administer: $50 • Tuition • Subaward: $30, 000

Provide a rationale JUSTIFICATION

Budget Justification • Identifies your costs and explains the need for them. • Answers any questions a reviewer may have about how you calculated your costs • Indicates the base salaries and any yearly increases • Should reflect the objectives of the project.

Tips • Be sure everything in your budget is referenced in the proposal and everything in your proposal that would incur cost is explained in the justification. • Follow the same order as the budget • The more “unusual” the request, the more justification needed (personal computers)

Salaries and Wages • Provide enough detail to make it clear why each person is necessary to the project and what the contribution will be: • PI: P. Plum, Ph. D is Assistant Professor of __ in the __ department, with extensive experience in __. Dr. Plum will be responsible for __. • Research Assistant: TBN, MS, will work with __ on __. In year one, this RA will __.

Description of Duties • Weak: C. Mustard will analyze all data associated with the project. • Strong: C. Mustard will be responsible for statistical analysis of data collected in experiments 1 -3 which are directly tied to specific aims 3 and 4. He will also be responsible for day-today project planning, coordination with experts at partnering institutions, writing all progress reports, and supervising the RA.

Travel • Provide information about: • • • Purpose Duration Points of departure and destination Number of travelers Cost per traveler • Registration fees, ground transport, etc.

Materials and Supplies • Provide a list of the general types of expendable materials and supplies required • You do not have to have an exhaustive list or show catalog numbers or other documentation • Provide sufficient detail to show: • You have anticipated the materials needed • There is adequate justification for the amount requested.

Consultants • Be sure that the daily rates is not in excess of the maximum allowed by the funding agency, provide justification of the rate • If travel and subsistence costs are not factored into the daily rate, these should be justified separately

Subawards • Justification for a subaward budget should come from the subaward partner(s) • Include one or two sentences describing why the work cannot be done at NMU and why you chose the partner(s) you did

Tips Don’t give them something to cut Don’t try to give the agency a bargain Too many 000’s look like you guessed on costs It’s not how much money you want, its how much the project costs • Double-check what expenses the sponsor will not allow • A budget is just plan, it can be renegotiated • •

Questions? • Kristin Beck krbeck@nmu. edu