Graduate TutorGT Outcomes Graduate Tutoring GT Outcomes Figure

Graduate Tutor(GT) Outcomes

Graduate Tutoring (GT) Outcomes Figure 1. Comparison of GT and Non-GT Course Section Headcount by Ethnicity 42%44% 27% 23% 15% 10% 7% 7% 0% 0% African American Indian 6% 5% 4% 4% Asian Filipino 1% 0% Latino Non-GT Course Sections • Other 2% 2% Pacific Unreported Islander White GT Course Sections Across terms, there were larger proportions of Asian students and Latinx students represented in GT course sections compared to course sections with no GT, whereas the opposite was true among White students.

Graduate Tutoring (GT) Outcomes GT Sections Compared to Non-GT Sections • • • Across all terms, retention rates tended to be higher for students enrolled in GT sections than for students enrolled in sections without a GT for the same courses. Course GPAs also tended to be higher for students enrolled in GT sections than those who were not. This pattern held true for Latinx students*. Retention Rates of All Students in GT and Non-GT Courses Retention Rates of Latinx Students in GT and Non-GT Courses 95% 91% 89% 87% 82% 85% 86% 84% 86% 79% Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Non-GT Section Fall 2017 Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Non-GT Section *Note: This pattern was also found for African American students, but the samples were much smaller and thus, are not reported here. Fall 2017

Graduate Tutoring (GT) Outcomes GT Sections Compared to Non-GT Sections The same was found for success rates…. • Across all terms, success rates tended to be higher for students enrolled in GT sections than for students enrolled in sections without a GT for the same courses. • Again, this pattern held true for Latinx students*. Success Rates of All Students in GT and Non-GT Courses 71% 77% 76% 63% Fall 2016 Success Rates of Latinx Students in GT and Non-GT Courses 68% 67% 59% Spring 2017 Non-GT Section 67% 76% 74% GT Section Fall 2017 Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Non-GT Section 63% Fall 2017 GT Section *Note: This pattern was also found for African American students, but the samples were much smaller and thus, are not reported here.

Graduate Tutoring (GT) Outcomes Within GT Sections – Contacts with GT • • • When looking within the GT course sections, retention rates tended to be higher for students enrolled in GT sections who had at least one out of class contact with the GT compared to those with no out of class contacts. Course GPAs also tended to be higher for students who had at least one out of class contact with a GT compared to those who did not. This pattern held true for Latinx students. Retention Rates of All GT Students by Out of Class Contacts 99% 95% 94% Retention Rates of Latinx Students by Out of Class Contacts 100% 87% 100% 94% 100% 84% 77% Fall 2016 97% Spring 2017 No out of class contacts 76% Fall 2017 At least one out of class contact Fall 2016 Spring 2017 No out of class contacts Fall 2017 At least one out of class contact

Graduate Tutoring (GT) Outcomes Within GT Sections – Contacts with GT • • Success rates also tended to be higher for students enrolled in GT sections who had at least one out of class contact with the GT compared to those with no out of class contacts. Once again, this pattern held true for Latinx students. Success Rates of All GT Students by Out of Class Contacts 87% Success Rates of Latinx Students by Out of Class Contacts 85% 82% 83% 75% 70% 86% 83% 70% 57% 44% Fall 2016 Spring 2017 No out of class contacts Fall 2017 At least one out of class contact

Classroom Tutor(CT) Outcomes

Classroom Tutoring (CT) CT Program Information: Fall 2015 -Fall 2017 Course ACCT 116 A ANTH 102 ASTR 101 BIOL 107 CHEM 100 CHEM 152 ENGL 043 ENGL 047 A ENGL 049 ENGL 101 ESOL 045 FREN 101 GEOG 101 GEOL 100 MATH 046 MATH 092 MATH 096 MATH 104 MATH 116 MATH 119 PSYC 101 Section. Count Enrollments 1 3 7 5 2 4 1 7 1 5 1 1 7 3 1 13 8 4 6 6 1 Avg. Size 43 136 302 117 77 208 27 165 26 117 25 29 278 127 40 463 324 181 247 303 45 43 45. 3 43. 1 23. 4 38. 5 52 27 23. 6 26 23. 4 25 29 39. 7 42. 3 40 35. 6 40. 5 45. 3 41. 2 50. 5 45

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Overall Course success rates for courses with Embedded Classroom Tutor as compared to the same courses without a CT 72% 73% 65% 83% 78% 64% 65% 65% 64% FA 16 SP 17 77% 69% 64% 56% FA 15 SP 16 SU 16 CT Non_CT SU 17 FA 17

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Overall success and retention rates for courses with Embedded Classroom Tutor based on the number of outside contacts students had with the CT 84% 93% 91% 89% 78% 71% 98% 88% 75% 62% None 1 -2 3 -5 6 -10 Number of Out of Class Contacts with CT Success Rate Retention Rate more than 10

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Course GPA for courses with Embedded Classroom Tutor based on the number of outside contacts students had with the CT 2. 9 2. 77 2. 69 3 -5 6 -10 2. 54 2. 31 None 1 -2 more than 10

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Outcomes for Sections with Embedded Classroom Tutors Ethnicity CT Use Enroll Success Rate Retention Rate GPA Avg. CT Visits Used CT Did not Use CT Used CT African American Did not Use CT American Used CT Indian Did not Use CT Used CT Asian Did not Use CT Used CT Filipino Did not Use CT Used CT Latinx Did not Use CT Used CT Other Did not Use CT Used CT Pacific Islander Did not Use CT Used CT Unreported Did not Use CT Used CT White Did not Use CT 1, 025 2, 255 100 170 4 7 87 220 31 100 418 898 42 135 7 11 16 38 320 676 77% 62% 52% 100% 86% 83% 76% 84% 58% 72% 56% 64% 60% 71% 45% 69% 76% 87% 6. 3 0 6. 1 0 18. 5 0 4. 7 0 6. 5 0 6. 7 0 7. 1 0 2. 4 0 5. 4 0 6. 1 0 Overall 92% 84% 83% 84% 100% 86% 97% 90% 94% 78% 89% 82% 93% 86% 100% 82% 88% 95% 96% 85% 2. 69 2. 31 2. 27 1. 74 3. 46 3. 00 2. 82 2. 91 2. 26 2. 53 2. 06 2. 36 2. 21 2. 35 1. 70 2. 35 2. 73 3. 00 2. 59

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Success Rate changes for each Ethnic Group in courses with Embedded Classroom Tutor based on whether students had outside contact with the CT (Used CT – Did not Use CT). Filipino, 26% White, 20% Latinx, 16% African American, 10% Asian, 7% Other, 4% % change Unreported, -7% Note: Only includes Ethnic groups with 10 or more students in both Groups (Used the CT, did not use the CT)

Classroom Tutoring (CT) % of students who accessed CT outside of classroom by Ethnicity compared to representation in the CT sections Students who accessed CT African American, 10% All Students in CT Sections American Indian, 0% African American, 8% Asian, 9% American Indian, 0% White, 31% Asian, 8% White, 30% Filipino, 4% Filipino, 3% Unreported, 2% Is. , Pacific 1% Other, 4% Latinx, 41% Unreported, 2% Pacific Islander, 1% Other, 5% Latino, 40%

Classroom Tutoring (CT) Success Rate changes within each Subject with Embedded Classroom Tutor based on whether students had outside contact with the CT (Used CT – Did not Use CT). ANTH, 42% FREN, 29% GEOG, 29% GEOL, 28% ASTR, 21% ACCT, 7% ENGL, 18% MATH, 11% BIOL, 10% CHEM, 5% PSYC, 3% ESOL, -13%

Mesa Tutoring and Computing Centers (MT 2 C) Outcomes

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 1. Comparison of Tutoring Center Visitors and Non-visitors by Ethnicity 36% 32%32% 11%11% 9% 9% 5% 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 0% 0% African American • American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino Tutored Not tutored Other Unreported White No different ethnicity pattern was noted between students who visited Mesa Tutoring and Computer Centers (MT 2 C) and who did not visit MT 2 C.

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 2. Comparison of Tutoring Center Visitors and Non-visitors by Gender 54% 46% Female Male Tutored • 46% Not tutored No different gender pattern was noted between students who visited Mesa Tutoring and Computer Centers (MT 2 C) and who did not visit MT 2 C.

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 3. Comparison of Tutoring Center Visitors and Non-visitors by Age 59% 57% 19% 18% 13% 11% 7% 4% 1% Under 18 18 - 24 25 - 29 Tutored • 30 - 39 4% 40 - 49 5% 3% 50 and > Not tutored Students under 18 years of age, who mostly are dual enrolled at high schools and Mesa College visited MT 2 C less. In other age groups, only small differences in visiting pattern is noted.

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 4. Comparison of Tutoring Center Visitors and Non-visitors by Educational Goal 63% 54% 11% 6% 6% Associate's Degree 4% Bachelor's Degree 13% 7% 10% 9% 4% Basic Skills/Ed. Development Tutored • 14% Career/Vocational Concurrent University Undecided/Unreported Student Not tutored Students who have an educational goal to obtain bachelor’s degree tend to visit MT 2 C more.

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 5. Comparison of Tutoring Center Visitors and Non-visitors by Enrollment Status 72% 68% 14% 9% 8% 8% 8% 1% Continuing Student Current High School Student First-Time Student Tutored • • First-Time Transfer Student 4% 4% Returning Student 1% 2% Returning Transfer Student Not tutored Continuing students and first-time students tend to visit MT 2 C more. Current high school students dually enrolled at Mesa visited MT 2 C less.

MT 2 C Visitor Demographic (Fall 2017) Figure 6. MT 2 C Visitor Distribution by Location 46% 32% 5% Athlete 6% 3% CISC 5% 1% HTC 3% 0% Language Center Math and Science Music STEM Center Vet Writing Center Tutored • Students visited MT 2 C sites to get help on math and science courses, and writing the most in Fall 2017.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 7. Overall Retention and Success Rate Comparison 92% 87% 2. 94 81% 70% Retention Rate Tutored • Course Success Rate Not tutored 2. 69 Mesa GPA 3. 02 2. 88 2. 74 2. 51 Term GPA Tutored SDCCD GPA Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have better retention and success rate, and higher GPA.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 8. Retention and Success Rate Comparison by Gender 93% 87% 91% 86% 3. 05 84% 72% Female Male Retention Rate 2. 77 68% Male Course Success Rate Tutored • Female 78% Not tutored Female 2. 81 2. 60 Male Mesa GPA 2. 98 2. 59 Female 2. 77 2. 94 2. 66 2. 43 Male Term GPA Tutored 3. 10 2. 82 Female Male Cumulative GPA Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently better course outcomes in retention, success and GPA

MT 2 C Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 9. Retention Rate Comparison by Ethnicity 100% 95% 94% 90% 89% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% African American Indian 94% 93% 92% Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino Other Unreported Retention Rate Tutored • 87% 85% Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher retention rate. White

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 10. Success Rate Comparison by Ethnicity 94% 87% 75% 70% 87% 79% 74% 66% 60% African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino 85% 84% 79% Latino 68% Other 83% 73% Unreported Success Rate Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher course success rate. 75% White

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 11. Mesa GPA Comparison by Ethnicity 3. 02 2. 38 3. 19 2. 84 2. 99 3. 21 3. 18 2. 81 2. 78 2. 47 2. 28 African American Indian 2. 92 Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino • 2. 93 2. 61 Other Unreported Mesa GPA Tutored 3. 12 2. 86 Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher Mesa GPA. White

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 12. Term GPA Comparison by Ethnicity 3. 19 2. 79 2. 68 3. 15 3. 10 2. 85 2. 68 2. 77 2. 32 3. 01 2. 88 2. 62 2. 32 2. 71 2. 40 2. 10 African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino Other Unreported Term Gpa Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher Term GPA. White

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 13. Cumulative SDCCD GPA Comparison by Ethnicity 3. 30 3. 02 2. 59 2. 70 2. 75 3. 14 2. 86 2. 89 2. 57 2. 43 African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino 3. 18 3. 17 3. 04 2. 65 Other 2. 86 Unreported 2. 93 White SDCCD GPA Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher Cumulative SDCCD GPA.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 14. Math Course Outcomes Comparison 89% 2. 95 83% 2. 71 2. 45 68% 2. 69 2. 29 2. 36 Mesa GPA Term GPA 59% Retention Rate Course Success Rate Tutored • Not tutored Tutored Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have higher course outcomes in math. SDCCD GPA

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 15. Math Course Outcomes Comparison by the Number of Visit 91% 88% 93% 3. 04 96% 83% 67% Retention Rate 1 -5 times • 11 -20 times 69% 2. 66 2. 80 3. 04 3. 14 71% Course Success Rate 6 -10 times 2. 42 2. 51 2. 46 2. 72 3. 15 2. 89 More than 20 times Mesa GPA 1 -5 times Term GPA 11 -20 times 6 -10 times Cumulative GPA More than 20 times The more students visited MT 2 C, the better course outcomes in retention and success rate is noted. GPA in general is aligned with the pattern with a slight variance.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 16. Math Course Retention Rate by Ethnicity 100% 89% 80% 82% African American Indian 88% 87% Asian/Pacific Islander 93% 82% Filipino 89% 91% 83% Latino 80% Other 89% 87% Unreported 89% 85% White Retention Rate Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher retention rate in Math courses.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 17. Math Course Success Rate by Ethnicity 78% 67% 75% 74% 70% 62% 65% 56% 55% 71% 64% 65% 53% 47% 41% African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino Other Unreported White Success Rate Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher success rate in Math courses.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 18. Math Course Mesa GPA by Ethnicity 2. 96 2. 93 2. 60 2. 56 2. 73 2. 45 2. 23 1. 80 1. 82 2. 00 African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino 2. 44 2. 39 2. 11 Latino 2. 56 2. 13 Other Unreported White Mesa GPA Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have generally higher Mesa GPA except for African American and American Indian students.

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 19. Math Course Term GPA by Ethnicity 3. 14 2. 73 2. 13 3. 07 2. 69 2. 76 2. 51 2. 24 2. 83 2. 75 2. 60 2. 47 2. 18 2. 23 1. 94 African American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino Other Unreported Term GPA Tutored • 2. 59 Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher Term GPA. White

MT 2 C Visitor Outcomes (Fall 2017) Figure 20. Math Course Cumulative SDCCD GPA by Ethnicity 3. 21 2. 97 2. 57 2. 74 2. 40 2. 88 2. 80 2. 83 2. 52 2. 50 African American Indian 3. 01 Asian/Pacific Islander Filipino Latino 3. 01 3. 11 2. 86 2. 89 2. 60 Other Unreported White SDCCD GPA Tutored • Not tutored Students who visited MT 2 C have consistently higher Cumulative SDCCD GPA.