Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain Module

Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain Module 6. 1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 1 – Promoting food safety along the food chain

Objectives § To make stakeholders aware of the importance of the role of monitoring programmes in assuring food safety § To make stakeholders aware of main considerations in planning monitoring programmes 2 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Outline of presentation § What is contaminant monitoring and how does it contribute to food safety § Factors to consider in the design and operation of monitoring programmes § International guidelines on food contaminants and use of food contaminant monitoring data internationally 3 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

What are contaminants? Contaminants Any substance not intentionally added to food, which is present in such food as a result of the production, manufacture, processing, treatment, packing, packaging, transport or holding of such food or as a result of environmental contamination Codex definition 4 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

What is monitoring? Possible working definition The act of carrying out planned observations, measurements, etc in order to collect, review and use information for a stated goal (to assess a particular situation) Food contaminant monitoring The act of carrying out planned observations or measurements related to the occurrence of food contaminants in order to collect and analyse information needed to achieve stated food safety goals 5 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Why contaminant monitoring? § To protect public health § From chemical and microbiological hazards § Through proactive, preventative programmes based on scientific evidence § By enabling better prioritisation of food control resources § By regular evaluation of efficacy of existing food safety measures 6 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Why contaminant monitoring? § To facilitate food trade § By providing a scientific base to support food safety decisions § By developing consumer or importer trust through demonstrated commitment to food safety § Through improved transparency by making contaminant data widely available 7 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Food-borne hazards § Monitoring programmes provide information on occurrence of hazards § A hazard is: A biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect § Hazards can include § § 8 Micro-organisms Heavy metals and environmental contaminants Residues of pesticides and other agricultural chemicals Naturally-occurring toxins Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Mycotoxins – an important food safety hazard § Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by a number of moulds while growing on a range of foods § The elimination of this naturally occurring toxin from the food supply is not possible – good food safety management allows the reduction of these hazards to tolerable levels § Public health risks are associated with acute and chronic exposure to mycotoxins § Mycotoxin monitoring programmes exist in many countries 9 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Responsibilities for food safety § Food industry § Is responsible for ensuring that food produced is safe and meets all requirements established by government § Government § Is responsible for establishing food safety requirements for industry to meet § Should ensure compliance with food safety requirements 10 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Economic operators in the food chain Why are they responsible for food safety? § § § 11 They are in the best position to prevent or minimise the occurrence of hazards by implementing adequate food safety management programmes throughout the food chain Adequate food safety management is part of the ‘cost’ of doing business – they should bear this cost They can benefit through increased consumer confidence (and reduced loses) Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Government’s interest in food safety § Government has a responsibility to defend public interests – such as public health § Government must safeguard the country’s economic interest by assuring importing countries that their food safety requirements are met 12 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does industry meet its food safety responsibilities? § Maintaining adequate quality assurance programmes § § § GHP in primary production Raw material control systems Cleaning, sanitation and pest control Process controls Proper storage and transportation Document control systems § Carrying out periodic monitoring to verify that standard operating procedures and quality/safety assurance programmes are functioning well 13 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does government meet its food safety responsibilities? § Communication with economic operators at all stages of the food chain and consumers on food safety issues § Establishment of appropriate legislation and regulations § Economic operators should be consulted during the process of elaborating legislation and regulations § Legislation and regulations should be consistent with international guidelines and regulations § Training and other technical support to industry § Government has an important role to play in assisting economic operators to understand meet their food safety obligations § Technical support to economic operators must be tailored to their needs – this is particularly important for small enterprises 14 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does government meet its food safety responsibilities? § Implementation of controls to ensure compliance § Adequate resources are necessary to run compliance programmes § Monitoring programmes allow verification that food safety measures are effective 15 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain Module 6. 1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 2 – Design and operation of programmes

Monitoring data – basis for decision-making § Deciding what contaminants might be of public health concern § Providing data for risk assessment of contaminants thought to present a substantial public health risk § Allowing assessment of risk management options for handling specific problem § Allows continual evaluation of adequacy of existing food safety measures / suitability of food handling practices § Can facilitate pro-active food safety programming 17 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Monitoring data – building stakeholder confidence § Demonstrates commitment to food safety § Making data available to stakeholders can build trust § Trust can lead to improved cooperation – nationally and internationally 18 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – initial planning § First step should be a clear statement of programme objectives § May serve to give a general picture of exposure to contaminants and toxins § Can be used to investigate some specific problem § May allow evaluation of effectiveness of a particular food safety measure § Can allow assessment of impact of new industry practices § Etc. . . 19 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – joint planning? § The better the background information, the better the planning of a monitoring programme § Scope for collaboration with industry and trade bodies, other government or research institutions? § Other agencies/groups might be interested in collaborating in monitoring programme § Staff and financial resources to support monitoring programmes are important considerations 20 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme design § Must be well matched with stated objectives § Should take into consideration compounds that are likely to be of public health significance § Should take into consideration factors known to affect level of contaminant (climatic conditions, geology, processing/ handling methods) 21 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme design § Should select appropriate matrices (target tissues) for sampling and testing § Should include the statistical basis for the sampling plan and analysis of results § Should take into consideration available resources (technical and financial) to support the programme 22 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme operation § Describe sampling procedures including sample selection, collection, identification and security § Describe analytical methods, document that they are validated and consistent with stated objectives of monitoring programme 23 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain Module 6. 1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 3 – The international context

Codex and food safety § Codex standards and guidelines are recognised by the WTO as the benchmark for safety of food in international trade § Codex Alimentarius Commission has adopted many standards, guidelines and maximum levels relevant to monitoring programmes for food contaminants and other hazards § Codex food safety standards are based on risk analysis 25 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex General Standard on Contaminants and Toxins in Foods § Takes a ‘horizontal’ approach to dealing with contaminants and toxins in food and feed (does not cover residues of vet. drugs or pesticides) § Outlines general principles on contaminants in foods § Emphasis on prevention measures § Risk assessment is necessary when contaminated foods pose a health hazard § Risk management policy must be applied to deal with substantiated public health concerns § National measures should not be unnecessarily trade restrictive 26 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex General Standard on Contaminants and Toxins in Foods § States principles for establishing maximum levels § Max. level of a contaminant in a food should only be set when the food contributes significantly to total exposure § All technological possibilities to comply with max. levels should be taken into account § Outlines criteria to be considered when making recommendations on contaminants in Codex, covering § § § 27 Toxicological information Analytical data Intake data Fair trade considerations Technological considerations Risk assessment and risk management considerations Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex maximum and guideline levels for contaminants § Methyl mercury in some fish § Vinyl Chloride and Acrylonitrile in food and packaging material § Maximum level and sampling plan for aflatoxin in peanuts (for further processing) § Radionuclides in foods § Aflatoxin M 1 in milk § Patulin in apple juice § Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead in various product groups 28 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex maximum levels for chemical residues § Database of Codex maximum levels are available from the Codex website § Codex MRLs for pesticides § Codex EMRLs* § Codex MRLs for vet. drugs - 2466 - 50 - 289 * Extraneous maximum residue limit for contaminants arising from environmental sources, including former agricultural use 29 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

GEMS/Food § The Global Environmental Monitoring System/Food contamination and assessment programme was established in 1976 § GEMS/Food is implemented by WHO in cooperation with a network of collaborating institutions in over 70 countries § GEMS/Food contaminant databases are available at the WHO web site § GEMS/Food periodically prepares assessment documents to provide a global overview of problems of chemicals in food 30 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Use of GEMS/Food monitoring data § GEMS/Food informs governments, Codex Alimentarius Commission and other relevant institutions as well as general public § On levels and trends of contaminants in foods § Contribution of contaminants in foods to total human exposure § Monitoring data is used in carrying out international risk assessments 31 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Use of monitoring data in food safety decision-making Codex § Maximum levels § Guidelines and Codes of practice Results of risk assessment Contaminant monitoring programmes Scientific Advisory bodies - JECFA, JMPR, JEMRA 32 § Patterns of contamination, § Exposure data Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Recent JECFA risk assessments of mycotoxins § Aflatoxin in peanuts - comparison of public health significance of maximum levels of 10 and 15 g/kg § Aflatoxin M 1 in milk - public health significance of maximum levels of 0. 05 vs. 0. 5 g/kg § Ochratoxin A in cereal products - public health significance of maximum levels of 5 vs. 20 g/kg 33 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Conclusions § Contaminant monitoring is an important component of food control programmes § Data from monitoring programmes strengthen risk assessment and risk management decisions at international and national levels § Monitoring programmes must be carefully designed and implemented according to stated objectives § Collaboration among stakeholder groups should lead to better planning of monitoring programmes and optimal use of available resources in their implementation § Adequate food analysis capability and capacity is essential to support contaminant monitoring programmes 34 Module 6. 1 – Contaminant Monitoring