GMS 6096 Introduction to NIH Grant writing for
- Slides: 32
GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant writing for biomedical sciences. Jan 28, 2015 Thoughts on grant writing David Fuller Dept. of Physical Therapy Mc. Knight Brain Institute University of Florida ddf@phhp. ufl. edu
How do grants get funded? My view: 3 key considerations that apply to RO 1, R 21 and RO 3.
How do grants get funded? Good idea
How do grants get funded? Good idea VERY clearly presented
How do grants get funded? Good idea VERY clearly presented Luck / Good planning
The following slides will provide an overview of what *I think are some of the most important aspects of a successful grant application *, others will probably have different opinions
Reviewers are trying their best. (reviewing is a difficult job)
Assume nothing except that the reader will be intelligent
Read as many successful grants as you can.
What is great art? Girl with a Pearl Earring Johannes Vermeer The Scream Edvard Munch Wheat Field with Cypresses Van Gogh
Templates usually don’t work Girl with a Pearl Earring Johannes Vermeer The Scream Edvard Munch Wheat Field with Cypresses Van Gogh
Use all available resources Collaborators: Equipment: Intellectual environment:
A unifying central hypothesis A good idea when possible. It usually makes the grant easier to read.
The Aims page should read like a (good) novel Tell a story. Help the reader. Write the review for the reviewer.
Choose your study section carefully Use the cover letter. Do NOT suggest specific names of reviewers.
Preliminary data New vs. Senior Investigator New vs. established method Central vs. peripheral hypothesis Often new investigators have more preliminary data than they think…
Never, ever “just submit and see what happens”
Do not wait until the last minute for: Abstract Rebuttal Vertebrate animals Personal statements Etc.
*Acronyms are almost always a terrible idea *unless it is “DNA” or something at that level of public awareness
Figures & tables need to be very easy to read
Revise, Tweak, Proofread …. alot 100+ hours
Resubmissions Should I resubmit? Address all concerns The rebuttal is perhaps the most important part of the resubmission
Resubmissions Be prepared to admit that aspects of your initial idea (or maybe the entire idea) is/are bad Be prepared to admit that your initial draft needs to be “blown up”
R 21 vs. RO 3
R 21
R 21
R 21 Consider carefully if the submission should be an RO 1
R 21: my experience 2 funded R 21 grants Pilot data
RO 3 http: //grants. nih. gov/grants/funding/r 03. htm
RO 3 http: //grants. nih. gov/grants/funding/r 03. htm
RO 3: my experience http: //grants. nih. gov/grants/funding/r 03. htm
Thank You
- Gms bredstedt
- Gms groundwater modeling
- Jobs fund gms
- Gms karlsbad waldbronn
- Dcjs gms
- Gms bc
- Thorsten saager
- Gms rfu login
- Staufer gemeinschaftsschule
- Gms im szw
- Grants management system gms
- Grants management system gms
- Gms perlesreut
- Gms
- Toonpool
- Undp gms
- Aspergillus terreus
- Fonsecaea compacta
- Electronic grant management system
- Hmrf egms
- Gms ecommerce
- Staufer gms waiblingen
- Grant writing examples
- Grant writing tutorial
- Grant writing usa
- Kontinuitetshantering i praktiken
- Typiska drag för en novell
- Nationell inriktning för artificiell intelligens
- Returpilarna
- Shingelfrisyren
- En lathund för arbete med kontinuitetshantering
- Personalliggare bygg undantag
- Vilotidsbok