Gloucester High School Master Plan School Board Update
Gloucester High School Master Plan School Board Update January 24, 2018
Facility Assessment • • Civil Architectural Roofing Structural Mechanical Electrical Plumbing
Civil Parking Lots • • • Significant cracking Patches throughout Drainage flumes eroded and undermined General wear and tear throughout Parking lots: Fair Condition Athletic Facilities • • • Tennis Courts: Fair condition Softball: Good condition Baseball: Good condition Stadium & Track: Good condition Practice Fields: Good condition Consider • • ADA seating Bathroom facilities Concessions Press Box
ADA Non-compliant casework Non-compliant door hardware Non-compliant drinking fountains Non-compliant toilet rooms. • Insufficient clearance • Missing grab bars • Non-compliant fixtures Non-compliant ramp. • Vertical change in elevation exceeds what is allowable for single ramp. • Missing handrails • Doors opening on to ramp.
Architectural Ceilings • 2 x 2 lay-in ceiling tiles • Poor to Good Condition • Would need to be removed if above ceiling work is performed (Sprinkler, HVAC) Casework • Poor to Fair Condition • Many instances of Non ADA accessible design Floors • Terrazzo: Good condition • VCT: Poor to Good condition
Architectural Lockers • Corridor Lockers: Good Condition • Athletic Lockers: Poor Condition Doors • Poor to Fair Condition • New doors would need to be Fire Rated with closers to comply with Code requirements (unless sprinkler system is installed) Interior Finishes • Types Vary; Poor to Good Condition
Architectural Windows • Hollow metal frames • Evidence of rusting on some frames • Fair to Good condition Visual Display Surfaces • Chalkboards • Whiteboards • Smartboards
Roofing Poor Condition • Requires restoration within next 2 -3 years Fair Condition • Requires restoration within next 1215 years Good condition • Requires restoration within next 15 years • Some repair work required now
Structural System • Good Condition • Minor cracks were observed but do not present a structural concern. • Lateral bracing will be required in order to meet current Codes if interior partitions are modified
Mechanical | AHUs & RTUs Roof Top Units Life Expectancy Condition Quantity Age 14 RTUs 24 years old 15 years Poor 6 RTUs 12 years old 15 years Fair 2 RTUs 8 years old 15 years Good Air Handling Units AHU 1 AHU 2 AHU 3 AHU 4 AHU 5 AHU 6 44 years old 44 years old • Components of the system are in poor condition. • Units are very inefficient • All have exceeded useful life expectancy
Plumbing fixtures Do not meet current code requirements for water consumption. • Allowable: 1. 6 gallons/flush (Existing fixtures: 3 gallons/flush) • Many of the fixtures do not meet ADA requirements • Fixtures are in poor to fair condition. Water Heaters • • Building Area ‘A’ (Good condition) Building Areas ‘B’ and ‘C’ (Poor condition) International Café Kitchen (Poor condition) Area ‘D’ (Good condition) Water Coolers • Poor condition • Do not meet ADA Standards • Many are damaged and are not operational
Process | Design Committee Clint Alexander - GHS Teacher Erica Jenkins - Riverside Director Jim Brogan - GCPS IT Director Ralph Johnson - GCPS Ed Foundation Lori Buchanan - Sentara Director Heather Knight - Parent Gwyn Ciemniecki - GCPS HR Director Anne Lanan - GCPS Trans Director Rick Clemons - GCPS Superintendent Christi Lewis - GCPS Comm. Engagement Ken Cramer - Pastor Lighthouse Worship Heather Lucas - GCPS CFO Melissa Crawford - Chesapeake Bank VP Sam Markwith - GHS Graduate/Markwith Farms Kelly Dalton - ABG Teacher/Parent Wendy Mc. Intyre - Parent Anne Ducey-Ortiz GC Planning Director Amy Mc. Leod - Realtor/GYFL Vivian Eccleston - Student Jennifer Naquin - Parent Cassidy Evans - Student Elisa Nelson - Parent Holly Fleiger - Parent Elaine Norman - Retired Educator Beth Gibson - Parent Jessica North - GHS Media Specialist Mark Goodrich - NNSY Engineer Christina Parnell - Student John Gordon - Owner Chick-fil-A Dexter Parzanese - GHS Teacher Al Grant - NJROTC Steve Patton - GCPS Food Service Director Douglas Grossenbaugh - Canon GM Jason Perry - RCC Dustyn Hall - GHS Graduate John Phillips - Owner Phillips Energy Teresa Harmon - Parent Sheila Pillath - Gloucester YMCA Danielle Heaney - GHS Graduate Melanie Rapp Beale - Dominion Energy Heather Hogge - Parent Charles Records - GCPS School Board Kristy Hunter - GHS Health/PE Gary Rippel - Parent John Hutchinson - GCPS Asst. Supt. Kim Robins - Gazette Journal Chris Hutson - GC BOS Elizabeth Scott - GHS Teacher Donna Jemmison - GHS Teacher Cindi Sharp - Parent Scott Shorland - GCPS Construction Manager Brad Simmons - GCSO Sgt. /Safety Roger Simpson - Canon Steve Smith - Peninsula Heating and Air Sherry Spring - GC Econ Development Director Brian Stewart - GC Engineer Patrice Stokes - GHS Counseling Leslie Sturtz - GHS Teacher Crystal Thompson - GHS Teacher Chuck Wagner - GCPS Asst. Supt. Darrell Warren - GC Sheriff Ward Warren - Pastor 1 st Baptist Lyn Whitt - GHS Teacher Hutt Williams - RCC Gloria Williams - GC Chamber of Commerce
Process • Design Workshop #1 | Idea Mining & Skills • Design Workshop #2 | Curriculum and Instructional Space
Design Workshop | Wordle
Process • Design Workshop #3 | Initial Conceptual Plan Review • Design Workshop #4 | Developed Plan Review
Process • Design Workshop #5 | Further Conceptual Plan Review • Community Meeting No. 1 | December 4, 2017 • Community Meeting No. 2 | December 11, 2017
Conceptual Floor Plans
Existing Plan
Conceptual Plans Concept A New Addition: 16, 450 sq. ft. Concept B New Addition: 21, 990 sq. ft.
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept B
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept B
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A/B: 2 -Phase Option - Phase
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A/B: 2 -Phase Option - Phase
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A/B: 3 -Phase Option - Phase
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A/B: 3 -Phase Option - Phase
Conceptual Floor Plans | Concept A/B: 3 -Phase Option - Phase
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Site Plans | New
Conceptual Site Plans | New Site Concept New
Conceptual Site Plans | New Site Concept New
Conceptual Site Plans | New Site Concept New
Cost Models
Master Plan Concept A | Cost Model 111, 785 sf 135, 077 sf 13, 999 sf 16, 405 sf Timeline: Design: 10 -12 months Construction: 26 -28 months
Master Plan Concept A | Cost Model New Construction: • 16, 405 sf Light Renovation: • 111, 785 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 135, 077 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 13, 999 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270/sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $70. 2 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept B | Cost Model 111, 785 sf 135, 077 sf 13, 999 sf 21, 406 sf Timeline: Design: 10 -12 months Construction: 26 -28 months
Master Plan Concept B | Cost Model New Construction: • 21, 406 sf Light Renovation: • 111, 785 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 135, 077 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 13, 999 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270/sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $71. 9 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept A/B: 2 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 1 Highlights: • New main entry • Renovated A and C halls • New commons • Renovated media center • New drama room • All sitework 61, 550 sf. 106, 408 sf. 2, 595 sf. 16, 405 sf. Timeline: Design: 8 -10 months Construction: 16 -18 months
Master Plan Concept A/B: 2 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 1 New Construction: • 16, 405 sf Light Renovation: • 61, 550 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 106, 408 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 2, 595 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270 sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $52. 7 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept A/B: 2 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 2 Highlights: • Renovated D hall • Renovated gym and locker rooms • Classroom addition – D hall 50, 235 sf 28, 669 sf 11, 404 sf 5, 001 sf Timeline: Design: 6 -8 months Construction: 10 -12 months
Master Plan Concept A/B: 2 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 2 New Construction: • 5, 001 sf Light Renovation: • 50, 235 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 28, 669 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 11, 404 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270/sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $24. 1 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 1 Highlights: • New main entry • Renovated A hall • New commons • Renovated media center • New drama room • All sitework 55, 096 sf 58, 113 sf 2, 057 sf 16, 405 sf. Timeline: Design: 8 -10 months Construction: 16 -18 months
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 1 New Construction: • 2, 057 sf Light Renovation: • 55, 096 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 58, 113 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 2, 057 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270/sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $41. 8 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 2 Highlights: • Renovated C hall 6, 454 sf 48, 295 sf 538 sf 0 sf Timeline: Design: 6 -8 months Construction: 8 -10 months
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 2 New Construction: • 0 sf Light Renovation: • 6, 454 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 48, 295 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 538 sf | medium renovation plus slab work Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $15. 7 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 3 Highlights: • Renovated D hall • Renovated gym and locker rooms • Classroom addition – D hall 50, 235 sf 28, 669 sf 11, 404 sf 5, 001 sf Timeline: Design: 6 -8 months Construction: 10 -12 months
Master Plan Concept A/B: 3 -Phase | Cost Model – Phase 3 New Construction: • 5, 001 sf Light Renovation: • 50, 235 sf | HVAC, elec, lighting, finishes, technology, floors Medium Renovation: • 28, 669 sf | light renovation plus wall relocation Heavy Renovation: • 11, 404 sf | medium renovation plus slab work New Const $270/sf Reno Light: $141/s f Med: $157/s f Heavy: $199/s f Proj Costs Total Project Cost 30% Construction $24. 1 M FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Portable CR Rental Contingency Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Master Plan Concept New | Cost Model Timeline: Design: 12 -14 months Construction: 26 -28 months
Master Plan Concept New | Cost Model New Construction: • 293, 000, sf Demolition: • 260, 861 Site Work: • New parking lot and bus loop configuration. Synthetic turf on stadium field. Existing athletic facilities remain. New Const $270/sf plus Sitework Demo: $6. 65/ sf Proj Costs 25% Construction FF&E Tech/AV Survey Testing Commissioning A/E Fees Permits Contingency Total Project Cost $109. 3 M Jan 2020 Dollars Inflation 5. 25% annually Per Do. E 2007 -2017
Summary | Building Renovation • Additional 16, 000 sf to 22, 200 of instructional and support space • Performing Arts addition: relocated Chorus and Drama rooms • New Instructional Programs: o Information Technology/Cyber Security o Design/Engineering/Maker Spaces o Health/Medical Science • New building infrastructure: roof, HVAC, plumbing, electrical • Improved building and instructional technology
Summary | Building Renovation • Overall sense of building renewal; new finishes, ceilings, lighting • Improved circulation: widened corridors, enlarged corridor openings • Improved building security: Main entry • Professional teacher centers promoting flexibility and collaboration • Extended learning and collaboration areas for students • Supports enhanced learning opportunities for next 50 years • Promotes community engagement
Summary | Phased Options Pros • Can divide work into more manageable financial projects • Shorter durations of school disruption Cons • Overall combined phased project costs increase due to construction escalation and portable classroom rental • School campus in a constant state of construction/disruption • Possibility of subsequent phases never being realized
Summary | Site Improvements • Improved traffic flow for parents, students, faculty, visitors • Dedicated entrances into the school: bus, student, visitors/faculty • Separation of traffic types for improved site safety • Additional parking • Additional practice field • Identify future athletic fields • Identify future classroom addition • Identifiable new main entry
- Slides: 58