Gifted Underachievers Who what why Rutgers University Gifted

  • Slides: 34
Download presentation
Gifted Underachievers: Who, what, why? Rutgers University Gifted Education Conference 11/19/15 Dr. Elissa F.

Gifted Underachievers: Who, what, why? Rutgers University Gifted Education Conference 11/19/15 Dr. Elissa F. Brown elissabrown 21@gmail. com Who are they? How do we help?

Underachievers are students who exhibit a severe discrepancy between expected achievement and actual achievement.

Underachievers are students who exhibit a severe discrepancy between expected achievement and actual achievement. The discrepancy must not be the result of a diagnosed learning disability and must persist over an extended period of time. Gifted underachievers score high to superior on measures of expected achievement (Reis & Mc. Coach, 2000) 2

 n Speculation ranges from 10% to more than 50% of the gifted population

n Speculation ranges from 10% to more than 50% of the gifted population are underachievers. -Mc. Coach and Seigle (2008)

Causes of Underachievement Environmental Chronically, slowmoving classroom experiences Peer pressure to conform to be

Causes of Underachievement Environmental Chronically, slowmoving classroom experiences Peer pressure to conform to be “like” everyone else Loneliness, isolation from classmates Family dynamics Individual Unrecognized learning deficits that interfere with learning Deficits in self-regulation: impulsivity, disorganization Internalizing issues: anxiety, perfectionism, low self-esteem Externalizing issues: Rebelliousness, nonconformity, anger

Heacox’s Up From Underachievement Gifted Achiever Gifted Underachiever Pride in own work and effort

Heacox’s Up From Underachievement Gifted Achiever Gifted Underachiever Pride in own work and effort Resilience when things go wrong Practice risk taking Self-disciplined Goal-oriented --set out plan for own work and follow through Poor academic selfconcept, poor organisation External locus of control Perfectionism, so unlikely to take risks Independent --insist on doing only what they want to do Discrepancy between oral and written work

Pressures Gifted Underachievers Internalize n n Pressure to be the smartest Pressure to be

Pressures Gifted Underachievers Internalize n n Pressure to be the smartest Pressure to be different Pressure to be popular Pressure to be loyal

Family Issues Do students underachieve because they come from families in conflict? Does the

Family Issues Do students underachieve because they come from families in conflict? Does the underachievement of the child create problems in family dynamics? Is there an interaction between the underachiever and the family? 7

School Issues Regardless of exam performance, students who were believed to have tried harder

School Issues Regardless of exam performance, students who were believed to have tried harder were better rewarded than those who appeared not to have tried. Hyperactivity may be due to environmental issues: the school environment demands students to be docile, neat, quiet for extended periods of time, and interested in what the teacher is interested in. Teachers perceive eager students are motivated and unreceptive students are unmotivated Both students may be motivated; one to achieve a goal that requires study and the other to avoid it.

Turn and Talk…. If during the first five or six years of school, a

Turn and Talk…. If during the first five or six years of school, a child earns good grades and high praise without having to make much effort, what are all the things he doesn’t learn that most children learn by third grade?

Underachievement Framework (S. Rimm) 1. High achievers who see that when they work hard,

Underachievement Framework (S. Rimm) 1. High achievers who see that when they work hard, they get good grades. The curriculum is probably just beyond their grasp (eg challenging/rigor) and requires effort EFFORT + RESULTS + 3. Low achievers who do not need to work hard to get good grades. The curriculum is too easy and requires little to no effort EFFORT – RESULTS + 2. Struggling students who work hard, but do not get good grades. The curriculum needs modifications to allow for success EFFORT + RESULTS 4. Classic underachievers who put forth no effort and results are negative. They could come from either quadrant 2 or 3 EFFORT RESULTS 10

Quadrant 1 High Effort, High Outcomes Feel bright, creative, and approved of by parents

Quadrant 1 High Effort, High Outcomes Feel bright, creative, and approved of by parents and teachers Motivated to learn Extrinsic and intrinsic satisfaction Set realistic high goals, work hard, and persevere “Children will continue to achieve if they usually see the relationship between the learning process and its outcomes. ”

Quadrant 2 n High Effort, low outcomes Set goals too high, may be in

Quadrant 2 n High Effort, low outcomes Set goals too high, may be in competitive environment Sometimes parents set goals too high Learning disabled children or those with unusual learning styles fit here Feel dumb

Quadrant 3 n Low Effort, High Outcomes Most typical dilemma for gifted Not sufficiently

Quadrant 3 n Low Effort, High Outcomes Most typical dilemma for gifted Not sufficiently challenged so being smart means doing things easily Hit brick wall when faced with real challenge Remedies: challenging work, accerlerated or enriched curriculum, homogeneous grouping, differentiation

Quadrant 4 Low Effort, Low Outcomes Advanced stage of underachievement – happens for children

Quadrant 4 Low Effort, Low Outcomes Advanced stage of underachievement – happens for children in Quadrants 2 or 3 over time Given up reasonable goal setting Parents and teachers begin to doubt abilities Difficult to reverse and may be therapeutic help

Attribution Theory Students attribute success or failure to different causes: Danny got a C-

Attribution Theory Students attribute success or failure to different causes: Danny got a C- on the science test. He attributes his grade to the test being too hard. Pedro also got a C-. He had studied a lot and thought that he was lucky to get that grade. Lamar received an A. He thinks his ability earned his grade. Chou also got an A. He thinks the teacher likes him. 19

Attribution Theory: 4 areas Ability Effort Task Difficulty Luck 20

Attribution Theory: 4 areas Ability Effort Task Difficulty Luck 20

 I find the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have.

I find the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have. -Thomas Jefferson

Achievement-Orientation Model Expects to Succeed / be Supported (Environmental Perception) Possesses Adequate Skills to

Achievement-Orientation Model Expects to Succeed / be Supported (Environmental Perception) Possesses Adequate Skills to Perform the Task Motivation Values the Task or Outcome (Meaningfulness / Goal Valuation) Teachers Confident in One’s Ability to Perform the Task Sets Realistic Expectations and Implements Appropriate Strategies to Successfully Complete Goals (Self-Regulation) Task Engagement and Achievement (Self-Efficacy) Peers Family Siegle, 2009 Each of the four elements of the model (Meaningfulness, Self-Efficacy, Environmental Perception, and Self-Regulation) is usually present in individuals who achieve at a level commensurate with their abilities. Some of these factors may be stronger than others, but overall, achievement-oriented individuals display a combination of all four traits. Remediation can be based on diagnosing which element or elements are deficit and addressing them. Two individuals might have very different remediation programs based on their achievement-orientation profiles.

Rimm’s Laws 1. 2. 3. Children are more likely to be achievers if their

Rimm’s Laws 1. 2. 3. Children are more likely to be achievers if their parents join together to give the same clear and positive message about school effort and expectations. Children can learn appropriate behaviors more easily if they have models to imitate. Communication about a child between adults (referential speaking) within the child’s hearing dramatically affects children’s behaviors and selfperception.

 4. Overreaction by parents to children’s successes and failures leads them to feel

4. Overreaction by parents to children’s successes and failures leads them to feel either intense pressure to succeed, or despair and discouragement in dealing with failure. 5. Children feel more tension when they are worrying about their work than when they are doing that work. 6. Children develop self-confidence through struggle.

 7. Deprivation and excess frequently exhibit the same symptoms. 8. Children develop confidence

7. Deprivation and excess frequently exhibit the same symptoms. 8. Children develop confidence and an internal sense of control if power is given to them in gradually increasing increments as they show maturity and responsibility.

 9. Children become oppositional if one adult allies with them against a parent

9. Children become oppositional if one adult allies with them against a parent or a teacher, making them more powerful than the adult. 10. Adults should avoid confrontations with children unless they are sure they can control the outcomes.

 11. Children will become achievers only if they learn to function in competition.

11. Children will become achievers only if they learn to function in competition. 12. Children will continue to achieve if they usually see the relationship between the learning process and its outcomes. Rimm (2004)

Influences: Family Inconsistent parenting techniques In 95% of families, one parent emerged as the

Influences: Family Inconsistent parenting techniques In 95% of families, one parent emerged as the disciplinarian and the other acted as a protector. Parents tend to be overly lenient or overly strict – or may vacillate between the two, Bestowing adult status on a child at too young of an age may contribute.

Influences: Peers High-achieving peers have a positive influence on gifted students who begin to

Influences: Peers High-achieving peers have a positive influence on gifted students who begin to underachieve. The reverse is true as well. One study showed that 66% of high ability students named peer pressure as the primary force against getting good grades. Studies show that friends’ grades are very similar by the end of the year.

Reversing Underachievement Opportunities to explore interests Relationship with teacher Use of self regulation strategies

Reversing Underachievement Opportunities to explore interests Relationship with teacher Use of self regulation strategies Opportunity to work in preferred learning modality Time to interact with appropriate peers Opportunities to connect content with area of interests Development of goals associated with effort Out of school experiences Smaller teacher-student ratio 30

Achievement-Orientation Model Expects to Succeed / be Supported (Environmental Perception) Possesses Adequate Skills to

Achievement-Orientation Model Expects to Succeed / be Supported (Environmental Perception) Possesses Adequate Skills to Perform the Task Motivation Values the Task or Outcome (Meaningfulness / Goal Valuation) Teachers Confident in One’s Ability to Perform the Task Sets Realistic Expectations and Implements Appropriate Strategies to Successfully Complete Goals (Self-Regulation) Task Engagement and Achievement (Self-Efficacy) Peers Family Siegle, 2009 Each of the four elements of the model (Meaningfulness, Self-Efficacy, Environmental Perception, and Self-Regulation) is usually present in individuals who achieve at a level commensurate with their abilities. Some of these factors may be stronger than others, but overall, achievement-oriented individuals display a combination of all four traits. Remediation can be based on diagnosing which element or elements are deficit and addressing them. Two individuals might have very different remediation programs based on their achievement-orientation profiles.

 The surest way to make it difficult for children is to make it

The surest way to make it difficult for children is to make it easy for them -Eleanor Roosevelt