GEOSS Task AR09 01 b Architecture Implementation Pilot
GEOSS Task AR-09 -01 b Architecture Implementation Pilot AIP Phase 3, (AIP-3) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR-09 -01 b Task POC ADC 13, Pretoria May 2010
GEO Task AR-09 -01 b Architecture Implementation Pilot • Develop and pilot new process and infrastructure components for the GCI and the broader GEOSS architecture • Continuation of existing efforts, e. g. , IP 3, and new activities solicited through Calls for Participation (CFPs) “fostering interoperability arrangements and common practices for GEOSS” Slide 2
AIP-3 Schedule Call for Participation Kickoff Workshop at ESA January 2010 March 2010 Ministerial Summit, Beijing November 2010 All Deliverables Completed 2010
AIP-3 CFP Responses (34 to date) • • • • • AIRNOW BKG CEOS CIESIN Compusult CSIRO DRI E-Habitat EO 2 Heaven ERDAS ESA ESIP Federation ESRI Euro. GEOSS and GENESIS GENESI-DR Geoland 2 GIGAS Data Interoperability • • • • • GIGAS Disaster Mgmt GIS. FCU GMU CSISS GSDI IFGI INCOSE ISPRA and CNR JAXA Mines Paris. Tech, Ener. GEO, GENESIS NOAA DMIT PML Pozzi Team QA 4 EO Spot Infoterra Univ Heidelberg Univ Tokyo Washington U. St. Louis
AIP Communications Plan • Telecons – AIP Plenary Telecon – WG Telecons • E-mail list-servers – One plenary list – One list per work group • Collaboration Resources – Web. Ex and Dim – AIP use of Google Sites • GCI coordination – SIF – Best Practices Registry
AIP-3 Kickoff Workshop • Logistics www. ogcnetwork. net/AIpilot – 11 -12 March 2010 – Location: ESA ESRIN – Plenary and Parallel sessions • Objectives – Develop collaboration and interoperability goals – Develop detailed plans and schedule – Design beyond CFP AIP Architecture – Develop Scenarios suitable for directing development of Operational Exemplars
AIP-3 Working Groups and Leaders • Disaster Management • – Didier Giacobbo – Arnaud Cauchy • Water – – • Will Pozzi Stefano Nativi Liping Di Brad Lee • – Lionel Menard – Isabelle Blanc • • Data Harmonization – Herve Caumont • Data Sharing Guidelines – Steve Browdy – (CIESIN) Biodiversity and Climate – Doug Nebert – Stefano Nativi – Energy WG End-to-End Engineering – Nadine Alameh – Josh Lieberman – Larry Mc. Govern Health: AQ and Disease – Stefan Falke – François Marques Energy • Vocabularies and Semantics – Cristiano Fugazza – Roberto Lucchi – Masahiko Nagai
AIP-3 WG: End-to-End Engineering Josh Lieberman Nadine Alameh Hervé Caumont Larry Mc. Govern
End to the End of Discovery • Backwards: From User Strategy to Publication Practice Publication & Registration Applications & Queryables Vocabulary & Connections Users & Issues • Forwards: Users Drill Down to Data User Questions & Drill-down to Concerns Evaluation Metadata Standard, finegrained data access Immediate view of relevant data • Middle Outwards: Concept & Vocabulary Mediation Provider Data Vocabulary Concept Mapping & Inference Issue Vocabulary Decider
Reusable Process for Deploying Scenarios • Engineering Use Cases support SBA Scenarios • Scenarios: end user view of the value of GEOSS – Focused on topics of interest to a community – Occur in a geographic Area of Interest (AOI) – Steps in a scenario are Use Cases • Use Cases: reusable service oriented architecture – Use cases for discovery, data access, etc – Utilize Interoperability Arrangements
GEOSS Actors used in AIP
AIP Use Cases
New Use cases for AIP-3 • • Semantic mediation User Requirements Registry Data licensing User management
Services and Components Community Portals & Clients Data Access Services Registered Community Resources Slide 14
Interoperability Arrangements for Services
AIP-3 WG: Data Sharing Steve Browdy, IEEE
Data Sharing Guidelines WG • Data access conditions being considered: – Data licensing • Public domain (CC 0) • Creative Commons with attribution • Creative Commons non-commercial • Other and non-standard licenses – User management • User registration and login • Single sign-on open standard options – Open. ID, OAuth, Shibboleth
Data Sharing Guidelines WG • Use Cases for licensing conditions: – Currently in development – To be finished by late May to early June – Will include recommendation for metadata encoding and potential impacts to Clearinghouse and GWP • Use Cases for user management – Using ASTER GDEM and Disaster Management scenario as case studies – Will be addressed after licensing is completed • Experimental implementation of Use Cases – Development between May and September – Testing from July/August forward
AIP-3 Working Group: Data Harmonization Herve Caumont Erdas
AIP-3 Working Group: Data Harmonization • Information modelling – Reconciling WMO/CEOS geophysical parameters with the modelling of geographical features – GIGAS report • Quality assurance as part of the registration process (QA 4 EO) • Coordination with GEO task on Data Harmonisation required
Information (data) in AIP architecture Geophysical Observations Geographic Features Environmental Models Location Determination and Reference Frames
AIP-3 Working Group: Vocabularies and Semantics Roberto Lucchi RLucchi(at)esri. com Masahiko Nagai nagaim(at)iis. u-tokyo. ac. jp Cristiano Fugazza cristiano. fugazza(at)jrc. europa. eu
Goals • Create and collect semantic information – Creation, maintenance, and governance of vocabularies/thesauri • Use – Annotation of resource descriptions using thesauri – Exploitation of annotations in data and service discovery – Linkage of terms from independent thesauri
Progress • Weekly teleconferences started • Main topics – Resource Annotation – Mediation (leveraging annotations in resource discovery, evaluation, use and in user collaborations) – Cross-vocabulary relationships – User Requirements Registry coordination. • Outcome – new or refined use cases – best practices (e. g. core conceptual operations)
AIP-3 Working Group: Disaster Management Didier Giacobbo Spot Image Arnaud Cauchy Infoterra
Disaster Management - Introduction • Objective Update DM Reference Scenario from AIP-2 • Approach – Identification of Disaster Management initiatives – Comparative Analysis of GEOSS AIP-2 Reference Scenario and Dedicated DM reference scenario. – Gathering Comparative Analysis in order to produce a unique GEOSS AIP-3 Reference Scenario.
Disaster Management - Done • 4 Disaster Management Initiatives have been identified • CSDP • Ubiq-Mon (Typhoon Disaster Management in Tawain) • 3 D-WMS (3 D viewing and transportation network update for DM) • SAFER (Emergency Response Core Service - Europe) • 4 Comparative Analysis has been conducted http: //sites. google. com/a/aip 3. ogcnetwork. net/home/disaster-management/disaster-resources • 1 report dedicated to User Management in collaboration with End 2 Engineering
Disaster Management - Trends It should be considered • New actors dedicated to coordination • Additional details on geo-production (esp. Thematic Product) • Capabilities bring by the 3 D • Concept of Crisis Termination
Disaster Management - Next • Merge results of comparative analysis in the official template (draft for review 05/17/2010) • Address User Management (telecon 05/20/2010)
AIP-3 Working Group Energy Lionel Menard Mines Paris. Tech
AIP-3 Energy scenario: “Information on environmental impacts of the production, transportation and use of energy” Leader: Mines Paris. Tech (Poc: Lionel Menard & Isabelle Blanc) Team: GENESIS and Ener. GEO consortiums (European Commission FP 7 funded projects) Ecoinvent (Swiss SME) Why assessing the environmental impacts of the energy sector ? • • • Worldwide demand of energy is growing: global energy demand will increase by 40 -50 % from 2003 to 2030 (IEA, 2005) Energy production, transportation and consumption imply considerable pressures on the environment Sustainability of current and future energy consumptions is of serious concern Cross SBA concerns (Climate, Water, Ecosystems, Health) Need for information to help assessing current environmental impacts on a global and local scale : energy diversification leading to reduce pressure on the environment. Key issues when assessing the environmental impacts of the Photovoltaic sector (Users) • • What is the most favorable technology for PV module ? (Installers) What are the overall environmental performances of PV systems related to their implementation ? (Policy planners, Energy operators) What is the carbon footprint of a PV system according to its lifecycle ? (Policy planners, Energy operators) What are the overall environmental performances of PV systems related to their fabrication ? (Installers, Energy operators, Policy planners)
Scenario objectives: Provide the necessary GEOSS compatible components to answer user’s concerns • Component’s list includes: • OGC Web Map Service (WMS) and Web Processing Service (WPS) of: • Average annual solar irradiation (k. Wh/m 2) (Mines Paris. Tech) • Environmental outputs of PV systems (Ecoinvent & Mines Paris. Tech) • OGC • Appropriate web map (WMS) and web processing capacities (WPS) using software from the GENESIS solution (GENESIS) • Web Portal and Geodata Visualization Portlet (GUI) (GENESIS) CSW (Catalog Service Web) (Ener. GEO)
On going works… GENESIS Visualization Portlet displaying a SRTM Digital Elevation Model layer from OGC WMS deployed at Mines Paris. Tech
On going works… Ener. GEO CSW GEOSS Catalog candidate (http: //energeo. researchstudio. at)
Expected outcomes results from the GENESIS Visualization Portlet Carbon Footprint Map of mc-Si over France 12. 4% efficiency – manufactured in France no recycling - www. espace-pv. eu Several impacts compared to the country mix / k. Wh 100 90 80 70 60 50 PV electricity 40 Country mix 30 20 10 0 Climate change Non Renewable Human Toxicity primary Energy Mc-Si technology for PV modules Modules tilt : 30° PV system lifetime = 30 years Ecosystems
AIP-3 Summary Slides for GEO Task Symposium Health SBA: Air Quality and Infectious Diseases Workgroup Leads: Stefan Falke, François Marques May 24, 2010 Pretoria, South Africa
Air Quality and Health Data Infrastructure General search and use of GEOSS data and services Air Quality Community Catalog GEOSS Common Infrastructure Users AQ-specific search and use of GEOSS data and services Data Providers EDAC NGC Data. Fed Giovanni SEDAC ESA Primary Participants: US EPA, ifgi, EO 2 Heaven, ESIP, WUSt. L, CEOS WGISS Atmospheric Composition Interest Group, GMU CSi. SS, ISPRA, CSN Contributing Participants: BKG, ESA/FAO, QA 4 EO, The Univ. of Tokyo-Center for Spatial Information Science, GIGAS, geoland 2, Compusult, INCOSE, GENESI-DR, ESRI, CIESIN, PML AIP-3 Workspace: http: //sites. google. com/a/aip 3. ogcnetwork. net/home/air-quality-health
Related Air Quality and Health GEO Tasks • AR-09 -01 b – GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot – AQ&H Workgroup • AR-09 -02 a – Virtual Constellations – Atmospheric Composition Constellation (ACC) • • AR-09 -02 b: Atmospheric Composition Portal US-09 -01 a – Identifying Synergies between SBAs – Air Quality and Health User Needs Evaluation – User Requirement Registry • US-09 -01 b – Community of Practice Development – GEO AQ Co. P • • DA-09 -02 d – Atmospheric Model Evaluation Network DA-09 -01 b: Data, Metadata and Products Harmonization DA-09 -02 a: Data Integration and Analysis Systems Alliance HE-09 -02 a: Aerosol Impacts on Health and Environment HE-09 -02 b: AQ Observations, Forecasting & Public Info HE-09 -02 c: Global Monitoring for Persistent Organic Pollutants HE-09 -02 d: Global Monitoring for Atmospheric Mercury See the AQ Co. P site for more information: http: //geo-aq-cop. org/
AIP-3 Working Group: Water Will Pozzi www. ogcnetwork. net/AIpilot
AIP-3 Working Group: Water • Two Scenarios – Agricultural Drought – Water Quality • Aiming to be supportive of GEOSS Water Tasks • Informatics – Remove wading through multiple forms on web sites, requiring familiarity with the details of how data are organized within each data collection – Retrieval and updating of data (streamflow, etc. ) can be based upon an updated Water. ML
Designing an Interoperable system capable of Growth
Interoperability is required between Euro. GEOSS and USA efforts—and Australia “To develop a European Drought Observatory within the framework of INSPIRE specifications and GEOSS interoperability arrangements, fully integrated with local and national systems in Europe and international drought early warning systems as a European contribution to a Global Drought Early Warning System. ” Fast access through web portal Comparison and analysis Seamless up and downscaling New perspectives for R&D
AIP-3 WG: Biodiversity and Climate Change S. Nativi (CNR), Doug Nebert (USGS) nativi@imaa. cnr. it ddnebert@usgs. gov
Selected responses • Use Scenarios – e-Habitat & Species Occurrences Use Scenario • A web based decision-making tool for assessing environmental changes due to anthropogenic activities, including climate change – Weather Scenarios • an online analysis portal to achieve multi-temporal NDVI derivation from satellite observations • Resource providers – PMEL: Marine echosystem data on the UK region – Geo. Land 2: High resolution pan-european land cover and land use -real time and global biogeophysical parameters – ISPRA-CNR: Environmental monitoring data on Italy
Challenges and Opportunities • Share and chain – Datasets – Services – Environment Models • Align ontologies and contribute to the GCI ontology platform • Involve more scientific patrons • Work on the arctic region and collect more resources on that area • Contribute to the Geo. BON initiative as pilots
AIP depends on other GEO Tasks • DI-09 -02: Multi-Risk Management • DI-06 -09: Use of Satellites for Risk Management • WA-06 -02: Droughts, Floods and Water Management • WA-06 -07: Water Resource Management • BI-07 -01: BON • EN-07 -02 - Energy Enviro. Impact • HE-09 -01: Info Systems for Health • HE-09 -02: Monitoring and Prediction for Health • US-09 -01: User Engagement • DA-06 -01: Data Sharing Principles • DA-09 -01: Data Management • DA-09 -02: Data Integration and Analysis • DA-09 -03: Global Data Sets • AR-09 -02: Interoperable Systems for GEOSS • AR-09 -04: Dissemination and Distribution Networks
Architecture Video for Ministerial • Theme – Bold vision endorsed 5 years ago – Architecture vision has now been demonstrated – Ministers should invest in their agency developments consistent with plan • Sources – AIP-2 Demo Videos – Interviews – South Africa Summit Footage – GEOSS Design themes
References • GEO – earthobservations. org • GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – www. ogcnetwork. net/AIpilot • GEOSS registries and SIF – geossregistries. info George Percivall percivall@myogc. org
- Slides: 48