GENETYKA W ONKOLOGII ASPEKTY MEDYCZNE I EKONOMICZNE J

  • Slides: 42
Download presentation
GENETYKA W ONKOLOGII – ASPEKTY MEDYCZNE I EKONOMICZNE J. Lubiński INTERNATIONAL HEREDITARY CANCER CENTER

GENETYKA W ONKOLOGII – ASPEKTY MEDYCZNE I EKONOMICZNE J. Lubiński INTERNATIONAL HEREDITARY CANCER CENTER POMERANIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY READGENE SA Warszawa 25. 10. 2011 r.

F If we want to solve problem / be successful F we need to:

F If we want to solve problem / be successful F we need to: a) work hard and wise b) be lucky

Luck!!! Poland F ~38 mln country with high level of genetic homogeneity

Luck!!! Poland F ~38 mln country with high level of genetic homogeneity

Górski B. et al. AJHG, June 2000

Górski B. et al. AJHG, June 2000

POLISH FAMILIES WITH STRONG AGGREGATION OF BREAST/OVARIAN CANCERS (n=200) F BRCA 1 F BRCA

POLISH FAMILIES WITH STRONG AGGREGATION OF BREAST/OVARIAN CANCERS (n=200) F BRCA 1 F BRCA 2 ~65% ~4% Górski B. et al. Int. J. Can, 2004

POLISH PANEL OF BRCA 1 MUTATIONS F 5382 ins C F C 61 G

POLISH PANEL OF BRCA 1 MUTATIONS F 5382 ins C F C 61 G F 4153 del A 90% of mutations Górski B. et al. Int. J. Can, 2004

BRCA 1 FOUNDER MUTATIONS IN POLAND F GÓRSKI B. ET AL. - PATENT NO

BRCA 1 FOUNDER MUTATIONS IN POLAND F GÓRSKI B. ET AL. - PATENT NO P 335917 - MULTIPLEX PCR - 50€

A. BRCA 1 PROPHYLACTICS F Oral contraceptives < 30 yrs > 30 yrs F

A. BRCA 1 PROPHYLACTICS F Oral contraceptives < 30 yrs > 30 yrs F Breast feeding > 1 yrs F Later menarche per yr F Tubal ligation 0. 5 F Adnexectomy F Tamoxifen F Adnexectomy + tamoxifen RISK BR OV 1. 3 0. 5 0. 9 0. 2 0. 5 0. 15 0. 05

Scientific background DETECTION OF EARLY BREAST CANCERS IN BRCA 1 MUTATION CARRIERS USG ~20%

Scientific background DETECTION OF EARLY BREAST CANCERS IN BRCA 1 MUTATION CARRIERS USG ~20% MAMMOGR. ~20% MRI ~90% Narod S. et al. 2003

DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT OF BRCA 1 BREAST CANCERS F Prophylactic adnexectomy F Tamoxifen F

DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT OF BRCA 1 BREAST CANCERS F Prophylactic adnexectomy F Tamoxifen F Chemotherapy

MSH 2 / MLH 1 tests F In families matching the following criteria: Ø

MSH 2 / MLH 1 tests F In families matching the following criteria: Ø CRC + CRC END SB UR. TR. Ø ≥ 1 of cancers DGN < 50 yrs

FEATURES MODIFYING RISK OF COLORECTAL CANCER IN CARRIERS OF MSH 2/MLH 1 MUTATION BEGINING

FEATURES MODIFYING RISK OF COLORECTAL CANCER IN CARRIERS OF MSH 2/MLH 1 MUTATION BEGINING F COLOSCOPY WITH POLYPECTOMY 25 YRS F INTRAVAGINAL USG 35 YRS F RISK FROM 80% TO 30% F DETECTION OF EARLY CANCERS EVERY 2 YRS 1 YRS

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND F 4% (~200) of BRCA 1 carriers among 5000 relatives

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND F 4% (~200) of BRCA 1 carriers among 5000 relatives of women with breast cancer dgn < 50 yrs or ovarian cancer dgn at any age F Thanks to geneticists - oncologists from 20 Polish centers!

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND WEST-POMERANIA REGION JANUARY 2001 – MAY 2002 F 1, 258

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND WEST-POMERANIA REGION JANUARY 2001 – MAY 2002 F 1, 258 mln questionaires out of 1, 45 mln of inhabitants F the first worldwide large screening for hereditary cancers

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND BRCA 1 F MUTATION DETECTION COST F SURVEILLANCE COST 1650

POPULATION SCREENINGS IN POLAND BRCA 1 F MUTATION DETECTION COST F SURVEILLANCE COST 1650 € (USG, MAMMOGRAPHY, FNAB, ADNEXECTOMY, TAMOXIFEN) F RISK REDUCTION Ø BREAST 60% 10% (WITHOUT PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY) 750 €

COMPELLING ECONOMICS OF PREVENTION F Treatment costs 2000 -2003 BRCA 1 mutation carriers 500

COMPELLING ECONOMICS OF PREVENTION F Treatment costs 2000 -2003 BRCA 1 mutation carriers 500 € with~5 breast/ovarian cancers N=50 F Social security costs ~8 800 € F GP per capita lost ~50 000 € ~64 300 € Marska N, US 2004

High penetrance/risk – breast ca F Family history F DNA tests ü BRCA 1

High penetrance/risk – breast ca F Family history F DNA tests ü BRCA 1 ü BRCA 2 ü CHEK 2 – homozygotes – htr + FH – BRCA 2 (5972 C/T) ü ATM

NATIONAL PROGRAMME URGENTLY NEEDED!!!

NATIONAL PROGRAMME URGENTLY NEEDED!!!

Milestone discoveries 2. Complete remission of BRCA 1 – dependant breast cancers using Cis-platinum

Milestone discoveries 2. Complete remission of BRCA 1 – dependant breast cancers using Cis-platinum International Hereditary Cancer Center 2008/9

BRCA 1 -dependendnt breast cancer Preoperative treatment F 44 patients F 15 (+) –

BRCA 1 -dependendnt breast cancer Preoperative treatment F 44 patients F 15 (+) – 10/15 p. CR – 67% F 29 (−) – 24/29 p. CR – 83%

Retrospective analysis neoadjuvant treatment of 141 consecutive BRCA 1 mutation carriers with diagnosis of

Retrospective analysis neoadjuvant treatment of 141 consecutive BRCA 1 mutation carriers with diagnosis of breast cancer < 51 yrs (n=7000)

CHEMOTHERAPY F Neo-adjuvant treatment of breast cancer – complete pathologic remission F > 95%

CHEMOTHERAPY F Neo-adjuvant treatment of breast cancer – complete pathologic remission F > 95% of five year survival !

BRCA 1 – dependent BC F METASTATIC STUDY

BRCA 1 – dependent BC F METASTATIC STUDY

Response to treatment Months since initiation of treatment, * mean Number deceased Response Number

Response to treatment Months since initiation of treatment, * mean Number deceased Response Number Evidence of progression Complete 9 6 29. 3 2 Partial 7 4 27. 6 5 Stable disease 3 3 13. 6 3 Progressive 1 1 6. 0 1 From date of first treatment untill July 31, 2011 if alive, or untill date of death, if dead Byrski T et al.

CONCLUSIONS 1. Platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in a high proportion of patients with BRCA

CONCLUSIONS 1. Platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in a high proportion of patients with BRCA 1 -associated breast cancers 2. BRCA 1 testing is a critical issue for choice of breast cancer treatment 3. Validating studies needed

Milestone discoveries F Cancer chemoprevention using selenium International Hereditary Cancer Center 2011

Milestone discoveries F Cancer chemoprevention using selenium International Hereditary Cancer Center 2011

Przyczyny dotychczasowych niepowodzeń F Stężenia Se w diecie / organizmie? F Osobnicze różnice w

Przyczyny dotychczasowych niepowodzeń F Stężenia Se w diecie / organizmie? F Osobnicze różnice w genotypach?

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów a)

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów a) Kolejne raki piersi b) Raki piersi u nosicielek mutacji BRCA 1

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków piersi zależnie od genotypów

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków płuca i krtani niezależnie od

Asocjacja pomiędzy poziomem Se we krwi a ryzykiem raków płuca i krtani niezależnie od genotypów

Rak płuca F I vs IV ćwiartka p<0. 0001 OR 13. 2 CI 4.

Rak płuca F I vs IV ćwiartka p<0. 0001 OR 13. 2 CI 4. 6 -37. 6 F Se<56 μg/l 34/42 Se>90 -110 μg/l 0/15 !!! p<0. 0001 OR 125. 8

Ryzyko raka płuca a stężenie selenu we krwi Ryzyko 6 5 4 3 2

Ryzyko raka płuca a stężenie selenu we krwi Ryzyko 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 Polska 100 120 140 USA 160 180 200 stężenie Se [μg/l]

Wniosek – podsumowanie F Poziom selenu markerem grup ryzyka raków tytoniozależnych np. kwalifikacja do

Wniosek – podsumowanie F Poziom selenu markerem grup ryzyka raków tytoniozależnych np. kwalifikacja do TK płuc? F optymalizacja poziomu selenu – kilkakrotne obniżenie ryzyka raków tytoniozależnych?

Wniosek – podsumowanie F Genetyka w onkologii – wielki innowacyjny potencjał do wdrożenia zwłaszcza

Wniosek – podsumowanie F Genetyka w onkologii – wielki innowacyjny potencjał do wdrożenia zwłaszcza w POLSCE

COMMERCIALISATION ECONOMICAL APPLIED READ GENE RESEARCH CRISIS SA – SPIN OFFS

COMMERCIALISATION ECONOMICAL APPLIED READ GENE RESEARCH CRISIS SA – SPIN OFFS

READ GENE SA Main task: global leadership in cancer chemoprevention

READ GENE SA Main task: global leadership in cancer chemoprevention

www. hccpjournal. com

www. hccpjournal. com

Welcome for collaboration…

Welcome for collaboration…