Gender sensitive research in schools gender social class

  • Slides: 17
Download presentation
Gender sensitive research in schools: gender, social class, economic wealth, and intersectionality Scottish Universities

Gender sensitive research in schools: gender, social class, economic wealth, and intersectionality Scottish Universities Insight Institute Glasgow 23 June 2014 Joan Forbes & Gaby Weiner

Seminar Questions 1. What research approaches? 2. Specific ethical issues applying to research 3.

Seminar Questions 1. What research approaches? 2. Specific ethical issues applying to research 3. What contribution made to social justice and equity 4. Specific [participatory] methodological approaches used for hearing marginalised children’s views 5. What [methodological/research] lessons learnt?

The Scottish Independent Schools Project (SISP) (2006 -08) Ø Ø Ø - Question: How

The Scottish Independent Schools Project (SISP) (2006 -08) Ø Ø Ø - Question: How do social and other capitals work in and through independent schools in Scotland? Methodology: case study Methods: Analysis of school histories, magazines & other published documentation; school websites; Observations of classrooms, assemblies, student & staff refectories physical amenities & resources, sports facilities, boarding accommodation [supplemented with field-notes of informal discussions with staff/students in these contexts]; - Interviews with school managers, teaching staff, department heads, heads of PE & directors of sport & one former student. All interviews tape-recorded and transcribed. Focus groups of selected S 2 pupils (13 -14 year olds) Questionnaire completed by whole S 2 cohort in each school. Researcher reflexive questionnaire – separate data collection in 2010 -11 after main empirical study

Schools in project: o Ailsa, urban, single sex (girls), all-age 500 -1000 students. o

Schools in project: o Ailsa, urban, single sex (girls), all-age 500 -1000 students. o Brodie, urban, single sex (boys) primary and secondary stages school. 400 - 500 students, largely residential. o Cockburn, small town, all age, co-ed. 1000 – 1500 , mainly day, with c 100 boarders. [Researchers, core of 4]

Framing ideas… q Scottish policy and governance takes little account of the intersectional nature

Framing ideas… q Scottish policy and governance takes little account of the intersectional nature of aspects on in/equality such as the interlocking effects of gender and social class (F, Ö, W 2011). q Gender and other [intersectional]power relations are everywhere q Social structures and relations demand scrutiny and critique (Davies & Banks, 1992). q The research process itself necessitates scrutiny and critique

Key intersectionalities in the project: q Wealth: Average fees (2013) £ 10, 173 pa

Key intersectionalities in the project: q Wealth: Average fees (2013) £ 10, 173 pa (day); £ 26, 910 pa (boarding). Extras: uniform, stationery, textbooks, lunch, English language tuition etc. q Exclusivity: 4. 7% of pupil pop. in Scotland attend - in Edinburgh – 25% q Influence : Over 40% of Scottish ‘people of influence’ attended (1990) (Walford). q Internationality: 25% of boarders (2013) from ‘overseas’: viz. Germany 200+, Mainland China c 160; Russia c 80; Hong Kong c 75; elsewhere in Europe c 75; Spain c 70; North America c 27; South Asia c 26; France c 25; Nigeria c 25

Gender & class-based regimes o Ailsa: high aspirations for girls… (O). o Brodie: new

Gender & class-based regimes o Ailsa: high aspirations for girls… (O). o Brodie: new men, caring masculinities’ discourse … positioned against … an essentialised discourse of boys needing space to run (M). o Cockburn: much emphasis on examinations, and girls clearly do well, the influential school sports culture clearly favoured the boys (E). (Forbes & Weiner 2014) (Regimes, see Connell 1987)

Reflection: What research approaches? q Website analysis insightful, and generative; likewise open-ended student questionnaire

Reflection: What research approaches? q Website analysis insightful, and generative; likewise open-ended student questionnaire ‘metaphor’ item q Case-study enabled rounded picture to be gained of institutional policies and practices q Post-research reflexive study productive but should have been included in main body of research

Reflection: ethics q Documentation: SERA/BERA guidelines, access contracts with schools which agreed to participate

Reflection: ethics q Documentation: SERA/BERA guidelines, access contracts with schools which agreed to participate (private institutions); q Access: extent to which ‘powerful researched’ seek to control access, the research process and outcomes o Research relations: between researched and researchers - cut-across by class, status, personal biographies –e. g. final feedback session

Reflection: What contribution made to social justice and equity? o Necessary critique of gender

Reflection: What contribution made to social justice and equity? o Necessary critique of gender and other norms & assumed practices. ‘What frames our seeing? ’ (knowledge as perspectival, partial, provisional) o Importance of researcher reflexivity re- own self/positioning as researchers in the contexts of knowledge production and nature of the research process – including its power. o Cross –cutting investigation of impact of specific (economic, cultural and social) school [gender] regimes on research process. o Attention to practices that exclude, e. g. fee-charging; exclusive practices - space, time and resources etc…

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? o Importance of intersectionalities sensitivity in research: 1.

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? o Importance of intersectionalities sensitivity in research: 1. Incorporate conscientisation of gender (and intersectionalities) in research at all stages 2. Investigate hierarchies of power/knowledge on both institutional re/productions and research design, implementation, and writing. 3. Interrogate social orderings of space-time evident in particular power/knowledge relations, i. e. networks, subjectivities, affect, and possibilities for agency. 4. Integrate reflexivity in research design (all aspects)

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? o Importance of conscientization Characterised by design of

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? o Importance of conscientization Characterised by design of research which is alert to the [inter/sectional] cultural and social determination of gender roles and relationships in research, and the ethicopolitical imperative to strive for greater equality. Cf. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: NY: Continuum

Reflection: What [methodological/ research] lessons learnt? o Importance of researcher reflexivity Consciously reflexive as

Reflection: What [methodological/ research] lessons learnt? o Importance of researcher reflexivity Consciously reflexive as researchers - self-aware of positioning and [in this research] how specific socially, culturally and economically-privileged school regimes impact on research process. (Forbes, J. (2008) Reflexivity in Professional Doctoral Research. Reflective Practice, 9. 4, 449 -460)

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? Summary q Would we do it the same

Reflection: What methodological/ research lessons learnt? Summary q Would we do it the same way again? q What might we have done differently? q Did the project actually do what we wanted? q How did we use intersectionalities – and to what effects e. g. conscious of economic wealth, social class, gender, and ethnicity?

Selected project publications Forbes, J. & Weiner G. (2014) Gender power in elite schools:

Selected project publications Forbes, J. & Weiner G. (2014) Gender power in elite schools: methodological insights from researcher reflexive accounts. Research Papers in Education, 29. 2, 172 -192. Forbes, J. & Weiner, G. (2013) Gendering/ed research spaces: insights from a study of independent schooling. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26. 4, 455 -469. Forbes, J. , Öhrn, E. & Weiner, G. (2011) Slippage and/or symbolism: Gender, policy and Educational governance in Scotland Sweden. Gender & Education, 23, 761 -776. Forbes & Weiner (2008)Understated powerhouses: Scottish independent schools, their characteristics and their capitals. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 29, 509 Horne, J. Lingard, B. , Weiner, G. & Forbes J. (2011) Capitalizing on sport. . British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32. 6, 861 -879.

References o o o o o Arshad, R. , Forbes, J. & Catts, R.

References o o o o o Arshad, R. , Forbes, J. & Catts, R. (2007) The role of social capital in Scottish education policy. Scottish Educational Review, 39. 2, 127 Bishop, R. & Glynn, T. (1999) Culture counts: Changing power relations in education. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press. Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble. New York & London: Routledge. Connell, R. W. (1987) Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Davies, B. & Banks, C. (1992) The gender trap: a feminist poststructuralist analysis of primary school children's talk about gender. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 1, 1 -25. Delamont, S. (2009) The only honest thing: Autoethnography, reflexivity and small crises in fieldwork. Ethnography and Education, 4. 1, 51 -63. Gordon, C. (Ed. )(1980) Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972 -1977. Brighton: Harvester. Lather, P. (1993) Fertile obsession: validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34. 4, 673 -693. Walford, G. (1990) Privitization and Privilege in Education. London: Routledge.

Contact details: j. c. forbes@abdn. ac. uk gaby. weiner@btinternet. com

Contact details: j. c. forbes@abdn. ac. uk gaby. weiner@btinternet. com