Gender Differences in Only Fans Content Creators Subscription

Gender Differences in Only. Fans Content Creators’ Subscription Pricing Strategies Joshua Nichols, Marina Orrico, Zaharina Jimenez Faculty Mentor: Dr. Joshua Van. Arsdall

Online Mediums for Sex Work » Technological shift (Jones, 2015) 2

Content Creator & Consumer Behaviors » Gender differences in sex work (Shaver, 2005) » Comparing across online venues (The 2019 Year in Review) 3

4 Place your screenshot here Initial Data Collection » 117 Feminine – 104 Masculine

Full Price vs Discounted Price 5

Gender + Price Point Interaction » We hypothesize feminine -presenting individuals will market their Only. Fans content at a higher price point compared to masculinepresenting individuals 6

Price Point Difference by Gender 7 Effect of Gender Presentation: F(1, 207) = 24. 66, p <. 0001, p 2 =. 106 (Fig. 1)

Price Difference Trend Across Follower Bins 8 Effect of Gender Presentation: F(1, 207) = 24. 66, p <. 0001, p 2 =. 106 Effect of Follower Bin: F(6, 207) = 4. 24, p <. 001, p 2 =. 110 Gender * Follower Interaction: Not significant (Fig. 2)

Discounted Price Difference by Gender White Is the color of milk and fresh snow, the color produced by the combination of all the colors of the visible spectrum. (Fig. 3) Effect of Gender Presentation: F(1, 207) = 18. 85, p <. 0001, ηp 2 =. 083 9

Discounted Price Difference Trend Across Follower Bins 10 Yellow Is the color of gold, butter and ripe lemons. In the spectrum of visible light, yellow is found between green and orange. (Fig. 4) Blue Effect of Gender Presentation: F(1, 207) = Is the colour of the 24. 66, p <. 0001, ηp 2 =. 106 clear sky and the deep sea. It is located Effect of Follower Bin: F(6, 207) = 4. 24, p < between violet and. 001, ηp 2 =. 110 green on the optical spectrum. Gender * Follower Interaction: Not significant

In-person Trends Continued Online » Only. Fans as viable sex work » Persistence of gender differences 11

Exploring the Trend Over Time » Second data collection » Thematic Analysis 12

References Jones, A. (2015). Sex work in a digital era. Sociology Compass, 9(7), 558 -570. Shaver, F. M. (2005). Sex work research: Methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of interpersonal violence, 20(3), 296 -319. The 2019 Year in Review. (2019, December 11). Retrieved July 27, 2020, from https: //www. pornhub. com/insights/2019 -year-in-review Tripp, H. (2019). All Sex Workers Deserve Protection: How FOSTA/SESTA Overlooks Consensual Sex Workers in an Attempt to Protect Sex Trafficking Victims. Penn St. L. Rev. , 124, 219. Weinberg, M. S. , Shaver, F. M. , & Williams, C. J. (1999). Gendered sex work in the San Francisco Tenderloin. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 503 -521. 13