GDE Progress Report Barry Barish ILCSC Report CERN

GDE: Progress Report Barry Barish ILCSC Report CERN 9 -Feb-06 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC

Global Design Effort – The Mission of the GDE • Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope. • Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc. ) 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 2

The GDE after ~6 Months • How have we done? – We are on track – BCD produced by end of 2005 as promised. It will provide a sound basis for entering into a reference design effort, globally coordinate R&D program, begin industrialization, determine costs, etc. next year • What’s Next? – Undertaking Design/Cost effort toward Reference Design Report (RDR) – Assessing present R&D program to begin to provide global guidance in the future. 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 3

Baseline Configuration Document • Our ‘Deliverable’ by the end of 2005 • A structured electronic document – Documentation (reports, drawings etc) – Technical specs. – Parameter tables 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 4

Structure of the BCD Summary-like overview for those who want to understand the choice and the why Technical documentation of the baseline, for engineers and acc. phys. making studies towards RDR 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 5

Alternatives Section(s) Note ACD is part of the BCD 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 6

The Key Decisions Critical choices: luminosity parameters & gradient 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 7

Making Choices – The Tradeoffs Many decisions are interrelated and require input from several WG/GG groups 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 8

From Snowmass to a Baseline 2005 Snowmass August September October November December WW/GG summaries Response to list of 40+ decisions All documented ‘recommendations available on ILC Website (request community feedback) Review by BCD EC BCD Executive Committee: Barish Dugan, Foster, Takasaki Raubenheimer, Yokoya, Walker 7 -Feb-06 BCD EC publishes ‘strawman’ BCD Public Review GDE Report to ILCSC Frascati GDE meeting 9

GDE Frascati – The BCD Approved • December 2005 • Finished the BCD • Organized the GDE and the broader R&D and Design efforts for next year BCD 7 -Feb-06 http: //www. linearcollider. org/ GDE Report to ILCSC 10

7 -Feb-06 General Layout Plan 500 Gev GDE Report to ILCSC 11

Next Goal – Reference Design • Reorganized the GDE toward Design / Cost Effort • A global effort to design / cost the ILC is underway and working • Configuration Control; International Costing; Industrialization; Siting ------------- • A sound design must be established with convincing and affordable costing. • Global R&D program to demonstrate the ILC, improve over the baseline and reduce costs. 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 12

GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board Global R&D Program 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC GDE Design Cost Board RDR Design Matrix 13

GDE RDR / R&D Organization Reporting ICFA technical FALC Resource Board ILCSC resources GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board Global R&D Program 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC GDE Design Cost Board RDR Design Matrix 14

GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board Global R&D Program 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC GDE Design Cost Board RDR Design Matrix 15

GDE Members Chris Adolphsen, SLAC Jean-Luc Baldy, CERN Philip Bambade, LAL, Orsay Barry Barish, Caltech Wilhelm Bialowons, DESY Grahame Blair, Royal Holloway Jim Brau, University of Oregon Karsten Buesser, DESY Elizabeth Clements, Fermilab Michael Danilov, ITEP Jean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell University Atsushi Enomoto, KEK Brian Foster, Oxford University Warren Funk, JLAB Jie Gao, IHEP Terry Garvey, LAL-IN 2 P 3 Hitoshi Hayano, KEK Tom Himel, SLAC Bob Kephart, Fermilab Eun San Kim, Pohang Acc Lab Hyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l Univ Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF Vic Kuchler, Fermilab Lutz Lilje, DESY 7 -Feb-06 Tom Markiewicz, SLAC New. College Members David Miller, Univ of London Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab Marc Ross (SLAC) Youhei Morita, KEK Bill Alex Willis Mueller, (Columbia) LAL - Orsay Hasan Padamsee, Cornell University Andre Seryi (SLAC) Carlo Pagani, DESY John Sheppard Nan Phinney, SLAC (SLAC) Dieter Proch, DESY (SLAC) Ewan Patterson Pantaleo Raimondi, INFN Peter Garbincius (Fermilab) Tor Raubenheimer, SLAC Maseo (KEK) Francois Kuriki Richard, LAL-IN 2 P 3 Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LAL Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Kenji Saito, KEK Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK) Daniel Schulte, CERN Tetsuo Shidara, KEK (KEK) Norihito Ohuchi Sasha Skrinsky, Budker Institute Susanna Guiducci Fumihiko Takasaki, KEK (INFN) Laurent Jean Tavian, CERN (CCLRC) Deepa Angal-Kalinin Nobu Toge, KEK Nick Walker, DESY Andy Wolski, LBL Hitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku Univ Kaoru Yokoya, KEK Totals Americas 22 Europe 23 GDE Report to 49 ILCSCmembers Asia 16 16

GDE Structure and Organization • Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration – GDE Director • Barish – Regional Directors • Dugan – Americas • Foster – Europe • Takasaki – Asia – Accelerator Leaders GDE Executive Committee • Yokoya - Asia • Raubenheimer - Americas • Walker - Europe • Responsible for decisions and documentation for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD) and RDR 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 17

GDE Structure and Organization • GDE Groups – Design / Cost Engineers • Shidara – Asia • Bialowons – Europe • Garbincius – Americas – Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure • Baldy - Europe • Enomoto – Asia • Kuchler – Amercas – Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs) • Brau - Americas • Richard - Europe • Yamamoto - Asia – Accelerator Experts (44 GDE members) 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 18

GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR • Selected additions to the GDE following the BCD completion having needed skills in design, engineering, costing, etc • Change Control Board – The baseline will be put under configuration control and a Board with a single chair will be created with needed expertise. • Design / Cost Board – A GDE Board with single chair will be established to coordinate the reference design effort, including coordinating the overall model for implementing the baseline ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc. • R&D Board – A GDE Board will be created to evaluate, prioritize and coordinate the R&D program in support of the baseline and alternatives with a single chair 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 19

Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair) Markiewicz US Mishra US Funk US Kubo Asia Kuriki Asia Pagani EU Blair EU Schulte EU 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 20

Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair) Phinney US Paterson US Kephart US Enomoto Asia Shidara Asia Terunuma Asia Bialowons EU Delahaye EU Mueller EU 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 21

Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair) Padam U see S Himel U S U Wolski S Hayan o As ia Higo As ia Elsen E U Lilje E U 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 22

Approach to ILC R&D Program • Proposal-driven R&D in support of the baseline design. – Technical developments, demonstration experiments, industrialization, etc. • Proposal-driven R&D in support of alternatives to the baseline – Proposals for potential improvements to the baseline, resources required, time scale, etc. • Develop a prioritized DETECTOR R&D program aimed at technical developments needed to reach combined design performance goals 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 23

GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board ILC R&D Program 7 -Feb-06 GDE Change Control Board Global R&D Program GDE Report to ILCSC GDE Design Cost Board RDR Design Matrix ILC Design Effort 24

Request for Sample Site Information To be used to study siting issues, in advance of a call for “expressions of interest” to host the ILC 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 25

How and when to involve industry? • Large Scale Project Characterization – – Large Project Management Precision Engineering International Coordination Costing • Industrialization – – – 7 -Feb-06 Civil Construction & Infrastructure Cryogenics Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc Electronics and Control Systems Large Scale Computing GDE Report to ILCSC 26

From Baseline to a RDR 2006 July Jan Frascati Bangalore Vancouver Dec Valencia Freeze Configuration Organize for RDR Review Design/Cost Methodology Review Initial Design / Cost Design and Costing 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC Review Final Design / Cost RDR Document Release RDR 27

7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 28

Program • An 8 -day program for a complete education in linear colliders • 6 days of lectures on accelerators at Sokendai • 2 days at KEK to see and touch the real thing • Total of 21 lectures covering both basic and advanced accelerator topics • Emphasis on ILC but also including CLIC 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 29

Lecturers Students • All 21 lecturers confirmed • A team of first-class experts in the field • Good mixture of young and senior physicists • Good geographical distribution in the three regions: Asia – America – Europe = 7– 7– 7 • Good balance among various institutions, including CERN, DESY, INFN, KEK, PAL, Tohoku Univ. , SLAC, LBL, JLab and Fermilab 7 -Feb-06 • Overwhelming responses from around the world • No. of students to take: 80 • Applications received: 400 • Application deadline: Feb 15 • A tough job to select students • Preference given to applicants from HEP countries • A small number given to exceptional applicants from non-HEP countries • Selection based on applicant’s CV and one recommendation letter GDE Report to ILCSC 30

Funding • All students will receive financial aid for attending the school, including travel • North America: Ø A total of US$70 k received from DOE, Fermilab and SLAC for students and lecturers from North America • Asia: Ø Expecting US$70 -80 k (equiv. ) from JSPS for students and lecturers from Asia Ø KEK to cover local expenses (meeting rooms, A/V, school supplies, computers, local transportation, etc. ) • Europe: Ø The “Big Five” (CERN, DESY, INFN, PPARC, IN 2 P 3) will support their students and lecturers Ø But we need money for supporting European students who are not from these laboratories 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 31

Conclusions • Baseline Configuration Complete • GDE Reorganized for RDR effort • Design effort should be fully underway by Bangalore • Design / Cost documented in RDR by 2007 • Beginning process of guiding Global R&D Effort • Linear Collider Accelerator School looks promising 7 -Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 32