FUNCTIONAL CONTENT CORE CONTENT INSTRUCTION FOR STUDENTS WITH
- Slides: 24
FUNCTIONAL CONTENT & CORE CONTENT INSTRUCTION FOR STUDENTS WITH MODERATE DISABILITIES: A DISCUSSION Carly Roberts 4/22/11
Reviewed Article Collins, B. C. , Hagar, K. L. , & Galloway, C. C. (2011). Addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Development Disabilities, 46, 22 -39.
Pause for discussion… What does “access to the general curriculum” mean? What does it look like in practice? What should be the focus of instruction for adolescents with significant cognitive disabilities? What does “meaningful” instruction mean? What does it look like?
Research Questions Will middle school students with moderate to severe disabilities acquire both core content and a functional application through direct instruction? Will the students generalize that content across probe trials using novel materials and activities?
Student Participants 3 middle school students identified with moderate to severe disabilities who participate in alternate assessments Jason Morgan 14 year old male included 50 -60% of the day IQ 55 and adaptive behavior score of 56 14 year old male with autism included 40% of the day IQ 47 Rena 15 year old female with Down Syndrome included 40% of the day IQ 41
Teacher Participants Special education teacher 3 years of teaching experience Previously worked as a paraprofessional Working on her master’s degree Paraprofessional took over when the teacher went on maternity leave Experienced Had participated in a previous study Trained by the teacher
Goals Teacher chose content standards to work on and then created a academic content goal as well as a functional goal for that standard Chose content standards in language arts, science, and math
Reading Goals Content Standard Goal: Identify meanings of words/phrases from a grade level passage newspaper Functional Goal: functional application of the grade level words
Specific Reading Goals Student Content Standard Goal Functional Goal Jason Orally read the words president, representative, and governor Identify each verbally Morgan Read and receptively identify mayor, county, and district Point to the correct sight word identifying each when presented with an array of three Rena Read and receptively identify (by pointing to) the words, country, state, and city Point to the correct sight word identifying each when presented with an array of three
Science Goals Content Standard Goal: Identify chemical and physical properties of elements and compounds for the basic properties of (a) gas, (b) liquid, and (c) solid. Functional Goal: Identify change in properties for weather and cooking
Specific Science Goals Student Content Standard Goal Functional Goal Jason Verbally state the properties of presented real items State ways to change the properties of the real items used to cook breakfast Morgan Point to pictures of elements of the weather that were solid, liquid, or neither when presented with three choices. When given three choices, correctly identify appropriate clothing needed in each type of weather. Rena Point to pictures of elements of the weather that were solid, liquid, or neither when presented with three choices. Point to pictures of elements of the weather that were solid, liquid, gas, or neither when presented with three choices.
Math Goals Content Standard Goal: Apply order of operations using addition and multiplication. Functional Goal: Use the order of operations for computing sales tax.
Specific Math Goals Student Content Standard Goal Functional Goal Jason Use a task-analysis to apply the order of operations using addition and multiplication to compute sales tax Use the task analysis, paper and pen, and calculator, to compute sales tax for real items found in a newspaper ad Morgan Use a task-analysis to apply the order of operations using addition and multiplication to compute sales tax Use the task analysis, and a calculator to compute sales tax for real items found in a newspaper ad and then select the correct answer using a Bingo dabber Rena Use a task-analysis to apply the order of operations using addition and multiplication to compute sales tax Use the task analysis, and a calculator to compute sales tax for real items found in a newspaper ad and then select the correct answer
Teaching Procedures Setting: self-contained special education class Duration: 1 hour each day in the morning from September-April. Procedure: The teacher used constant time delay (CTD) to instruct and conduct one trial per stimulus per session. Each subject was taught to 100% criterion before beginning the next subject. The order was: (a) language arts, (b) science, and (c) math
Pause for discussion… What is the best setting to teach academic content area goals in—an inclusive setting or a self-contained setting? Is there time to do both?
Design Multiple probe design across behaviors (reading, science, and math tasks) replicated across participants Baseline: Students did not begin instruction in next subject area goals until they reached 100% criterion in previous subject. Baseline sessions consisted of three probe trials for functional and three probe trials for core content. Given task direction and tasks and waited 3 seconds for student response (no prompting, no CTD).
Design Continued… Instruction Generalization Constant time delay (first session 0 delay, subsequent sessions 3 second delay) Prompts were verbal models or verbal models paired with gestures Praise for correct responses and a model for incorrect responses Alternate assessment trials Same standard addressed using different materials or applications Maintenance After they reached mastery (100% for 3 sessions) in each subject only intermittent probes were conducted
Jason’s Results
Morgan’s Results
Rena’s Results
Conclusions Academic instruction of core content and functional instruction can be combined, although time constraints make it difficult. It improved the students’ ability to answer generalization probes based on the alternate assessment. Combining core content and functional content and basing the functional content off of grade level standards can help make instruction more meaningful.
Limitations They ran out of time! We don’t know if the students would have had more success if they started earlier in the year. Instructional time was limited (approximately five minutes per student per day) Instruction was in a self-contained class. Can it work in an inclusive classroom?
Discussion questions… Can academic core content and functional content be taught together? Does it make instruction more meaningful? Can this strategy improve student scores on the alternate assessment? Is it okay to prioritize instruction for subjects (i. e. wait to focus on math standards until prior subjects mastered)? Additional thoughts…
Thank You!
- Individualized instruction vs differentiated instruction
- Direct instruction method
- Differentiated instruction for gifted students
- Distal shoe appliance
- Non functional plasma enzyme
- Functional and non functional plasma enzymes
- Functional and non functional
- First favorite novel of rizal
- Enhanced core reading instruction
- Adjunct model content-based instruction
- Content based instruction disadvantages
- Organizing students to interact with content
- Using questions to help students elaborate on content
- Helping students elaborate on new content
- Inner core and outer core
- Mantle is made up of
- Layers of earth from most dense to least dense
- Core rigidity
- What is esp
- Dynamic content vs static content
- Iso 22301 utbildning
- Novell typiska drag
- Nationell inriktning för artificiell intelligens
- Ekologiskt fotavtryck
- Shingelfrisyren