Fu Su Ma Tech PSC meeting 03 Tuesday

Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC meeting #03 Tuesday 13 March 2018 CERN+ vidyo WP 4 Update for March 2018 Ziad Melhem Oxford Instruments Nanoscience Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 1

4. 4 Status of WP 4 ( Ziad) • Team members are confirmed • Updated list available for team members • Held a conference call with task leaders • Confirmed sub-tasks for each task • Agreed actions for the first 6 months • Agreed to have a meeting at Oxford before March 18 • Meeting confirmed for 4 th April 2018 at OI Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 2

WP 4 Tasks • T 4. 1: Quench analysis – from M 1 to M 18 • Task leader: Bernhard Auchmann (PSI) (– Participants: ELYTT, KIT • T 4. 2: Material properties database at Cryogenic temperature – from M 1 to M 18 • Task leader: Simon Canfer (STFC) – Participants: CERN, Ox. Inst, KIT, PSI • T 4. 3: Smart diagnostics – from M 1 to M 18 • Task leader: CERN Daniel Calcoen (CERN) – Participants: CEA • T 4. 4: Heat extraction and helium free cryogenics – from M 1 to M 18 • Task leader: Bertrand Baudouy (CEA) – Participants: Babcock Noell, ELYTT • T 4. 5: New high stress materials at cryogenic temperature – from M 1 to M 18 • Task leader: Klaus-Peter Weiss (KIT) – Participants: Ox Inst, CERN Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 3

Task 4. 1 PSI - Bernhard Auchman Quench Analysis ELYTT – Julio Lucas KIT - Wilfried Goldacker Potential avenues: • • • Unified geometry- and material-frontend to interface with various software tools (commercial, non-commercial) according to needs, license availability, preference, etc. Specialized algorithms for improved quench-front resolution at low computational cost. Co-simulation of software tools and models, each used within their resp. field of competency and validity. Development of diagnostics promising novel diagnostics and detection (optical, acoustic, capacitive, etc. ). Integration of diagnostics in cable. Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 4

: https: //drive. google. com/open? id=1 wj 60 e 0 I 9 VTi. MV 0 Oq. HSRH-5 T 4 -Ymf. WVLs. P 8 Mvd. MGIv 2 I Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 5

Task 4. 1 Quench Analysis • Online Survey among Fu. Su. Ma. Tech participants launched in Jan. ‘ 18. § Sixteen responses from: • Bilfinger Noell, CEA (2 x), CERN (3 x), CNRS, Elytt, KIT (2 x), Oxford Instruments, PSI, Sigma. Phi, Tesla (2 x) § Missing response from: AS-G, Alstom, STFC. • Industries (ordered by multiplicity) o o o LTS accelerators, LTS medical, HTS energy, HTS accelerator, LTS energy. • Typical geometries (ordered by multiplicity): o Solenoids, o long accelerator, o short accelerator

Task 4. 1 Quench Analysis q. Some questions and answers: § Software used: ANSYS 2 D, COMSOL 2 D, Opera vector fields, QLASA § Comm. software limitations/potential: • (+) support, rather flexible, HPC, • (–) workarounds necessary for superconductivity, setup time, licenses, computation time, blackboxes § Largest needs: • Materials data base working with commercial tools, HTS support, efficient 3 D, easy generic workflows, coupling to helium fluid dynamics § HPC: >50% of participants would benefit from better HPC support § Validation: 94% would benefit or benefit a lot from documented and measured bench-mark cases for code validation. § Material parameters: strong support for generic mat. Database to interface with multiple soft. s, list of “missing” data for LTS and HTS data. § Diagnostics needs: improved conductor temperature meas. Fast and distributed sensing, detection and diagnostics for HTS

Task 4. 1 Quench Analysis • Initial brainstorming with Julio Lucas yielded 5 potential Task 4. 1 initiatives: - Frontend open-source code for generation of superconducting-magnet models - Generate geometries easily (macros), extensible by participants - Include subscale modeling (e. g. turn 2 turn, heater 2 coil, longitudinal propagation) and ancillary equipment (diodes, switches) - Generate models in different tools (e. g. COMSOL, ANYS, Opera, open FEM, network solvers, etc. ) from the generic geometries - Materials - Integrate tightly with the material database of Task 4. 2 - Propose materials to be measured and data formats needed for simulation - Backend development - Fast 3 D solvers with HPC support - HPC infrastructure - Desktop solutions for insular use - Shared cluster with license pool - Validation community - Definition of benchmark cases - Workshops to discuss measurement data as well as simulation results, obstacles, improvements, etc.

Task 4. 1 Quench Analysis • Next six months: - Refine (as task team) the list of R&D initiatives and present the status to the community at the April 19 Fu. Su. Ma. Tech workshop. - Prepare a written plan for each of the initiatives (2 -3 pages in total) until August ’ 18, to circulate among participants, including - organizational structure of each initiative - IP implications - funding opportunities -Plan milestones until the end of the Fu. Su. Ma. Tech Phase 1, e. g. - draft project proposals - contact potential additional partners - find solutions to IP and licensing questions - contribution to final deliverable

T 4. 2: Material properties database at Cryogenic temperature Task leader: STFC – Participants: CERN, Ox. Inst, KIT, PSI • T 4. 2. 1 - Determine the standard measurement data format with detailed property data points covering the full operating temperature ranges from research activities, applications and industry, by liaison with representatives from academia and industry sectors • T 4. 2. 2 - Collect existing data, verifying its accuracy and its fit with the standard format • T 4. 2. 3 - Identify existing and new materials not yet measured. • T 4. 2. 4 - Develop a network of testing facilities, in which the different material properties can be measured. • T 4. 2. 5 - Propose a scheme for long time management of this data with succession Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 10

• T 4. 2: Preparation of a proposal for the creation of a new database of Material properties at Cryogenic temperature • Task leader: STFC – Participants: CERN, Ox. Inst, KIT, PSI • Objectives of the task • Plan a comprehensive open access, web based, trusted database* • Form a network of interested partners • Write a specification for a database • Identify existing and new materials • Propose a scheme for long term management • Liaise with the International Bureau of Weights and Measures • * Note: Implementation of Database is not part of T 4. 2 and not currently resourced via STFC Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 11

Sub –tasks and timescales: Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 12

Actions started • T 4 2. 4: Facilities survey • Low temperature European testing capabilities • T 4 2. 2: Data – collect and verify existing • Low temperature existing databases Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 13

Prototype Database • • T 4 2. 3 Antti’s database ? ? Build on existing databases ? ? Define scope Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 14

Not started: Data collection/verification • T 4. 2. 2 • Collect existing data, verifying its accuracy and its fit with the standard format Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 15

Not started: Identify existing/new materials not yet measured • T 4 2. 3 • Start by establishing gaps in existing databases. Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 16

Not started: long term management • T 4. 2. 5 - Propose a scheme for long time management of this data with succession planning to maintain the accessibility and growth of the information. Fu. Su. Ma. Tech WP 4 Skype Meeting 5 th March 2018 M C Wilson 17

T 4. 3: Smart diagnostics – from M 1 to M 18 Task leader: CERN – Participants: CEA Pilot 1 b Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 18

T 4. 3: Smart diagnostics – from M 1 to M 18 Task leader: CERN – Participants: CEA • T 4. 3. 1 Define R&D and pilot programme for industrial and scientific members and how the programme will be achieved • P 1. a) Feasibility study of transfer 60 GHz (RF) signal from magnet cryostat to outside world (RF transparent medium) • P 1. b) Feasibility study of wireless power transmission to the electronics working at low temperatures • P 2) Feasibility study of a 60 GHz wireless data transfer electronic module able to work at low temperature, at least 50 -70 °K range (Thermal Screen) (partners? CERN, CEA, Universitat Heidelberg ? ) • P 3) Feasibility study of the electronic conditioning module (instrumentation) working at low temperature (CERN) • T 4. 3. 2 Define required budget and intellectual property rules. • Budget should cover, researcher(s), use of laboratory infrastructure and material costs. No estimates at this stage. • Intellectual property rules should be proposed by CERN K. T. , in particular for the collaboration with several industrial partners. Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 19

T 4. 3 Status T 4. 3 Preparation for a proposal for R&D&I programme on Smart Diagnostics (After talking with Siemko and De Rijk) Plan - Preparing a matrix of the magnitudes/signals that we can measure inside a magnet, in which way (type, range, detector) (on going) - Which ones are of interest so - Looking for people to get involved in one or several signal (on going) - who will do it? europena laboratories or industry, how to found it? - IP (Intelectual Property) meeting on April will shape part of this - Need to get more people involved, (very few resource allocation) need to go to Paris and coordinate with CEA, Frederic Molinie - Try to make a case study with the new CERN 11 Tesla (Nb 3 Sn) to be more realistic to engage people Daniel comments: After take some time to understand in which direction to go (even now it is not crystal clear for me) the resources allocated are too low, so I need to engage more people (voluntary and for free because we can’t pay) to collect the information

T 4. 4: Heat extraction and helium free cryogenics Task leader: CEA – Participants: Babcock Noell, ELYTT • T 4. 4. 1 – Review of existing cryo-generator performances and of major cryogen free systems • T 4. 4. 2 – Review of Multiphysics software available for cryogenic design of cryogen free systems associated with database of properties. • T 4. 4. 3 – Identification of efficient European companies and research institutes in cryogenic issues • T 4. 4. 4 – Identification of needs in industrial HTS and LTS applications and in particular for the WP 5 technology pilots • T 4. 4. 4 – Identification of necessary improvements over the present state of the art and of the potential innovations • T 4. 4. 5 – Establishment of a work plan for the Fu. Su. Ma. Tech Phase 2 Moreover, we have not moved forward that much on that task as participants announced that they are very busy. Obviously I need to relaunch our task. Christophe Mayri is not involved in this project anymore, would you be kind to swap his name by mine. Thanks. Best regards, Bertrand Baudouy (CEA) Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël

T 4. 5 New high stress materials at cryogenic temperature Task leader: • KIT– Klaus-Peter Weiss Participants: • KIT – Klaus-Peter Weiss • CERN - STILL OPEN • OINS - Ziad Melhem

T 4. 5: New high stress materials at cryogenic temperature 1/3 – Action list Task leader: KIT – Participants: Ox Inst, CERN • T 4. 5. 1 Define key parameter to survey the state of the art and R&D on high strength materials WP 5 requirements coming from pilot projects (high-field accelerator magnets and for MRI, NMR and other) T 4. 2. 1 - Determine the standard measurement data format • T 4. 5. 2 List materials regarding their classes, characteristics and properties as defined T 4. 2. 2 - Collect existing data, verifying its accuracy and its fit with the standard format T 4. 2. 3 - Identify existing and new materials not yet measured. These actions give input for (Month 6) D 4. 1 - Development plan and schedule for generic R&D programme and MS 1 - Generic joint R&D&I actions defined Discussion & Feedback from • ITER ongoing material/component qualification • DEMO working group • HTS 4 Fusion workshop March 2018 (Japan) • Accelerator, MRI, NMR magnets is lacking needs to be supplemented

T 4. 5: New high stress materials at cryogenic temperature 2/3 – Action list Task leader: KIT – Participants: Ox Inst, CERN • T 4. 5. 3 Survey EU and worldwide efforts (projects/technologies) of high strength material fabrication and development Compare to WP 5 requirements • T 4. 5. 4 Identify actions on new materials to qualify them for application at cryogenic temperatures T 4. 2. 4 - Develop a network of testing facilities, in which the different material properties can be measured. These actions give input for MS 1 - Generic joint R&D&I actions defined (Month 6 ) and D 4. 2 – Development plan for a test facility to test materials, components and coils (Month 18 ) Discussion & Feedback • New alloys/materials to be used NIMS, Yokohama University • Production routes (grain refinement by forging etc, additive manufacturing) Polito Turin, COMTES, University Kosice • Further feedback from Fu. Su. Ma. Tech Partners needed !

T 4. 5: New high stress materials at cryogenic temperature 3/3 –Work plan Task leader: KIT – Participants: Ox Inst, CERN • Definition of first set of requirements on materials (strength, fracture, fatigue, also keep in mind thermal properties, magnetization, availability/cost, …) (month 2) • Interaction between participants Ox. Inst. /CERN via e-mail/phone/video • consultation of Task Leader T 4. 2 in parallel • Clarify requirements and expectation for pilot projects (month 4) Interaction with Task Leaders of WP 5 • Preparation of D 4. 1 to accomplish MS 1 (up to month 6) Interaction between participants Ox. Inst. /CERN via e-mail/phone/video consultation of Task Leader T 4. 2 in parallel / if required Task Leaders WP 5 • Work on actions T 4. 5. 3/T 4. 5. 4 to accomplish D 4. 2/D 4. 4 (up to month 18) • Implementation of IP for D 4. 3 (workshop on IP? ) (up to month 18) Interaction between participants Ox. Inst. /CERN via e-mail/phone/video consultation of T 4. 2 in parallel / if required Task Leaders WP 5 Using given information • Application for Enabling Research Project within EUROfusion regarding Cryo-Materials • Further preparation work necessary for e. g. Flagship Project in H 2020

Deliverables • Define R&D or pilot programme for industrial and scientific members and how the programme will be achieved; • Define required budget and intellectual property rules. • Work out the WP 4 contribution to the Fu. Su. Ma. Tech EU grant proposal. • • D 4. 1 – Development plan and schedule for generic R&D programme (Month 6) D 4. 2 – Development plan for a test facility to test materials, components and coils (Month 18 ) D 4. 3 – Rules for an IP management and dissemination (Month 18) D 4. 4 – Budget for each package (Month 18) WP 4. 5 Summary: • Material survey within Fusion community ongoing • First application for material project in the same direction to enhance visibility • Who is participating from CERN S. Sgobba? • Accelerator, MRI, NMR is lacking needs to be supplemented Catch up with 2 month lag provide summary of outcome so far and by calling a video conference end of March 2018

WP 4 - Deliverables • Define R&D or pilot programme for industrial and scientific members and how the programme will be achieved; • Define required budget and intellectual property rules. • Work out the WP 4 contribution to the Fu. Su. Ma. Tech EU grant proposal. • • D 4. 1 – Development plan and schedule for generic R&D programme (Month 6) D 4. 2 – Development plan for a test facility to test materials, components and coils (Month 18 ) D 4. 3 – Rules for an IP management and dissemination (Month 18) D 4. 4 – Budget for each package (Month 18) Fu. Su. Ma. Tech PSC Meeting #03 -Geneva-Tuesday 13 March 2018 Antoine Daël 27

Summary • All task are progressing except WP 4. 4 • Good progress with material data base • One day Task leaders meeting at OI 4 th April 18 • All confirmed their attendance plus Antoine. • Gijs will join by Conf call. • Plans going forward • • To have an Outline proposal for April Meeting at CERN Draft Proposal for End of Sep 18 Refine Proposal Dec 18 Final Proposal mar 19

Proposed Agenda for the Task Leaders Mtg at OI (4 th Apr 18) • • • Introduction (ZM) Update from Antoine (AD) Update on tasks (Task leaders) Update on State of the art of superconducting magnets WP 2 (GR) Proposed material database (AS) Preliminary proposals for each task (Task leaders) • Agree what will be presented at CERN Meeting in April 18 • Agree plans for next 6 mth (ALL) • Target: Draft proposal from each task by Sep 2018 for internal review • AOB • Close