From Design to Implementation Forging Partnerships and Mitigating

  • Slides: 5
Download presentation
From Design to Implementation: Forging Partnerships and Mitigating Threats to Validity in Field Experiments

From Design to Implementation: Forging Partnerships and Mitigating Threats to Validity in Field Experiments Eric Mvukiyehe Columbia University Images: IRIN

Forging and Sustaining Partnerships What are possible outlets for potential partnerships? Government agencies Private

Forging and Sustaining Partnerships What are possible outlets for potential partnerships? Government agencies Private institutions (incl. academic institutions) NGOs and international institutions Elites and political parties Takeaway: Different partners have different constraints & flexibility; find out about these to determine suitability for your project. What types of partnerships to negotiate? Partner-led collaborations Researcher-led collaborations Takeaway: Both types involve trade-offs & adjustment and certain conditions must be met for partnership to work.

Forging and Sustaining Partnerships… What are the conditions for collaboration? Potential for mutual interests:

Forging and Sustaining Partnerships… What are the conditions for collaboration? Potential for mutual interests: Feasibility of the experiment: Uncertainty about the outcome of an intervention; Intervention works, but mechanisms are not known; Low likelihood of harm to subjects and staff Flexible implementation (both practical and financial) Takeaway: Need to know when conditions are right for a field experiment. How to negotiate partnerships? Ability to play multiple roles, using different skill sets. Diplomatic skills Ethnographic skills Business consultancy skills Takeaway: Formalize agreements, esp. those pertaining to randomization, staffing and financing, data ownership and usage terms in MOU.

Threats to validity: causes and consequences Common threats to validity of field experiments No

Threats to validity: causes and consequences Common threats to validity of field experiments No compliance Attrition (missing data) Interference & spillovers Takeaway: These problems can undo random assignment & complicate your ability to draw causal inference. Sources of threats to validity of field experiments Violation of randomization protocols (e. g. , replacing inaccessible communities) Poor administration of treatments (e. g. , esp. when several variation in treatments) Different objectives between researcher and partner Insufficient & untimely resources Takeaway: Need to foresee these problems and take preventive or mitigating measures.

Threats to validity: Mitigating measures Coordinate closely with partner on treatment assignment and administration,

Threats to validity: Mitigating measures Coordinate closely with partner on treatment assignment and administration, but maintain control over the research process Limit knowledge of the experiments =>reduce potential for compliance & spillovers Learn as much as possible about the research environment before and during implementation Ensure adequate resources & pay attention to logistics Documentation, Documentation Mistakes can only be corrected if they are discovered and documented Responsibility to report problems & mitigating measures in publications.