FRIENDSHIP AND DELINQUENCY OF ADOLESCENTS First results of

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
FRIENDSHIP AND DELINQUENCY OF ADOLESCENTS First results of a four wave study on adolescent’s

FRIENDSHIP AND DELINQUENCY OF ADOLESCENTS First results of a four wave study on adolescent’s behavior and relations using an actor-driven statistical model Sunbelt conference, Slovenia, May 2004 Andrea Knecht: a. b. knecht@fss. uu. nl Chris Baerveldt: c. baerveldt@fss. uu. nl University of Utrecht; Heidelberglaan 2; 3584 CS Utrecht; The Netherlands Research programme: http: //ppswmm. ppsw. rug. nl/~steglich/dynamics/ Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

Overview · Introduction · Theoretical framework · Data · Model description · Results ·

Overview · Introduction · Theoretical framework · Data · Model description · Results · Further research

Selection

Selection

Influence

Influence

Introduction Friends are more likely to behave similarly regarding delinquent behavior (e. g. ,

Introduction Friends are more likely to behave similarly regarding delinquent behavior (e. g. , Haynie 2002). How can similarity in delinquent behavior of adolescent friends be explained: Do similar pupils select each other? or Do pupils influence each other? Problems of earlier research: – Only one mechanism is investigated (selection or influence) Other problems: – Cross-sectional data – Peer reporting – Network studies are rare

Theoretical framework Actor-driven model – Rational choice framework – Implemented in the statistical model

Theoretical framework Actor-driven model – Rational choice framework – Implemented in the statistical model SIENA Basic assumptions: – Control of outgoing ties and degree of delinquent behavior – Choice of behavior: cost-benefit analysis – Striving for social approval: status and behavioral confirmation – Relations to those who behave similarly are rewarding

Hypotheses • Selection DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR + FRIENDSHIP RELATION + DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR • Influence FRIENDSHIP

Hypotheses • Selection DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR + FRIENDSHIP RELATION + DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR • Influence FRIENDSHIP RELATION Note: Selection and influence can operate simultaneously. Our study allows to disentangle both processes.

Data: Sample - Pupils in first class of Dutch secondary school (Age: 12 -13

Data: Sample - Pupils in first class of Dutch secondary school (Age: 12 -13 years) - 14 schools with 126 classes (3, 108 pupils) - Different classes - Educational level Denominations Regions (urban and rural areas) Size of school and classes - 4 waves within one school year - High response (> 93%)

Data: Measurements • Network question: Who are your best friends in class? Up to

Data: Measurements • Network question: Who are your best friends in class? Up to 12 nominations • Behavior question: – Stealing – Breaking something – Graffiti – Fighting – Buying illegal copies of a music CD or a PC game 5 answer categories => Delinquency scale (5 -25)

Importance of friends in class August / September November/ December Most friends in class

Importance of friends in class August / September November/ December Most friends in class 43. 7% 51. 3% Most important friends in class 54. 2% 55. 1% Number of best friends in class 3. 55 4. 17

Delinquent behavior (in %) Steal Break sth. Fight Graffiti Having or buying an illegal

Delinquent behavior (in %) Steal Break sth. Fight Graffiti Having or buying an illegal copy Delinquency Scale Aug. /Sept. Nov. / Dec. boys girls 8. 9 15. 5 39. 3 10. 1 57. 0 5. 1 11. 2 20. 4 7. 4 39. 6 16. 2 24. 5 51. 3 20. 2 65. 8 9. 8 16. 2 26. 6 16. 0 50. 0 7. 65 6. 42 8. 72 7. 14

Network model Friendship relations as dependent variable Expected effects: X Delinquent behavior (sim. )

Network model Friendship relations as dependent variable Expected effects: X Delinquent behavior (sim. ) Y: Friendship relation + Controlling for: Density - Reciprocity + Actors at distance 2 - Popularity + Friends at primary school + Gender (similarity) +

Behavior model Delinquent behavior as dependent variable Expected effects: X Y: Delinquent behavior of

Behavior model Delinquent behavior as dependent variable Expected effects: X Y: Delinquent behavior of friends (Similarity) + Delinquent behavior x popularity of friend + Gender (girl 1; boy 2) +

Results: Example for behavior and network effects in one SIENA model for one network

Results: Example for behavior and network effects in one SIENA model for one network and three waves Estimate Standard error EFFECT ON NETWORK Rate (period I) 9. 25 2. 17 Rate (period II) 3. 64 0. 69 Delinquent behavior similarity 0. 07 0. 40 -1. 42 0. 33 1. 30 0. 23 -0. 82 0. 15 Friends at primary school 0. 41 0. 23 Gender (similarity) 0. 31 0. 22 Rate (period I) 18. 92 16. 37 Rate (period II) 9. 87 7. 16 Delinquent behavior similarity 1. 09 3. 26 -0. 30 1. 32 Density Reciprocity Actors at distance 2 EFFECT ON BEHAVIOR Similarity x popularity alter

Network model: Results of meta analysis (SIENA parameters for 20 networks) Mean Rate 8.

Network model: Results of meta analysis (SIENA parameters for 20 networks) Mean Rate 8. 222 Density -1. 823 Reciprocity 1. 402 Distance 2 -0. 925 Primary school 0. 574 Gender 0. 688 Delinquency 0. 122 S. E. 0. 609 0. 127 0. 098 0. 053 0. 121 0. 098 0. 014 Variance S. E. of Variance 3. 596 0 0. 051 0. 006 0. 086 0 0 2. 170 0 0. 057 0. 015 0. 084 0 0

Further research Extension of the analysis • More networks • Four measuring points •

Further research Extension of the analysis • More networks • Four measuring points • Behavior as dependent variable • Considering the difference between creating and breaking a tie • Meta analysis with ‘complete’ model (network and behavioral effects)

References Haynie, D. L. (2002). "Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer

References Haynie, D. L. (2002). "Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer delinquency. " Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18: 99 -134. Snijders, T. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology. S. M. and B. M. Boston and London, Basil Blackwell: 361 -395. Snijders, T. and C. Baerveldt (2003). "A Multilevel Network Study of the Effects of Delinquent Behavior on Friendship Evolution. " Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27: 123151.

Selected questions from the pupil’s questionnaire I Network questions • A maximum of 12

Selected questions from the pupil’s questionnaire I Network questions • A maximum of 12 nominations is possible • Measured only once: With whom from your classmates have you been friends at primary school? • Measured at four time points: Who from your classmates helps you with practical problems such as homework? Who from your classmates helps you when you are at a loss? With whom do you talk about personal things such as problems at home? Who are your best friends at class? With whom from your class would you like to be friends? Who in your class do you not like? With whom from your class do you arrange to meet outside school? Who in your class did bully you? Who in your class listens to the same music? Who in your class likes the same clothes? Whom in your class would you lend Euro 25? Whom in your class would you never lend Euro 25? Whose opinion from someone in your class is important to you? With whom from your class do you compare grades?

Selected questions from the pupil’s questionnaire II Behavior questions Answer categories: Never, once, 2

Selected questions from the pupil’s questionnaire II Behavior questions Answer categories: Never, once, 2 to 4 times, 5 to 10 times, more than 10 times What have you done in the last three months? (Asked at four measuring points) Delinquent behavior: stealing, fighting, graffiti, having or buying illegal copies of PC game or CD, breaking something School behavior: being late, skipping class… Life style & others: smoking, drinking Background information For example: Socio-economic status of parents Religion Ethnicity In addition to the four pupil’s questionnaire, we also have four questionnaires for the class teachers. Questionnaire (in Dutch) available on request