Finite Difference and Finite Volume Concepts for ZCoordinates

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
Finite Difference and Finite Volume Concepts for Z-Coordinates J. Steppeler, DWD Ljubljana 2005 Offenbach

Finite Difference and Finite Volume Concepts for Z-Coordinates J. Steppeler, DWD Ljubljana 2005 Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

 • • Z-Coordinate Concepts Vertical Velocities Cloud and Precipitation forecasts Conclusions Offenbach 11.

• • Z-Coordinate Concepts Vertical Velocities Cloud and Precipitation forecasts Conclusions Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Shaved Elements j + 1/2 i + 1/2 j + 1/2 i - 1/2

Shaved Elements j + 1/2 i + 1/2 j + 1/2 i - 1/2 i, j j - 1/2 i - 1/2 j - 1/2 i + 1/2 Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

The finite volume method for the treatment of the fast waves in LM-Z •

The finite volume method for the treatment of the fast waves in LM-Z • The computation of the fast waves is based on the evaluation of fluxes into a cell • The evaluation of the fluxes requires weights associated with the cell surfaces, which depend on their open part • Advection terms (slow waves) are computed by finite difference methods Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

The finite volume method for the treatment of the fast waves in LM-Z •

The finite volume method for the treatment of the fast waves in LM-Z • A-Grid Finite Difference Z-Discretisation Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

The step-orography • Advantage: simle boundary conditions with z-coordiante • Disadvantages: No proven convergence;

The step-orography • Advantage: simle boundary conditions with z-coordiante • Disadvantages: No proven convergence; In CFD not used (“legoland topography”; Problems with precipitation forecasts; Problems pointed out by Klemp • The disadvantages are avoided by representing the orography by a linear spline rather than steps Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Mountain generated waves: W (left), U (right) Eta - Model Analytic solution LM_Z Offenbach

Mountain generated waves: W (left), U (right) Eta - Model Analytic solution LM_Z Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Expected advantages of the Zcoordinate • The Violation of an Approximation condition is corrected,

Expected advantages of the Zcoordinate • The Violation of an Approximation condition is corrected, both for high and low wind situations • Stratiform clouds and low stratus are predicted better in LM-Z • Mountain and valley winds are better with LM-z • Precipitation should be better with LM-Z, in particular near mountains Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Day Night The Atmosphere at Rest Computed with the Z_LM Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Day Night The Atmosphere at Rest Computed with the Z_LM Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Low stratus Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Low stratus Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Z-coordinate Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Z-coordinate Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

28039700 6 to 6 • LM-Z OBS Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM-tf

28039700 6 to 6 • LM-Z OBS Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM-tf

28039700+12 • LM_Z • LM_tf Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

28039700+12 • LM_Z • LM_tf Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

 • LM_Z 28039700+12 Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM

• LM_Z 28039700+12 Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM

LM LM_Z Cross sections east-west for vertical velocity Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

LM LM_Z Cross sections east-west for vertical velocity Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Cloud water East west cross section LM LM_Z Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Cloud water East west cross section LM LM_Z Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

LM w, North-South Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM_Z

LM w, North-South Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 LM_Z

Qc for north south cross section LM LM_Z Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Qc for north south cross section LM LM_Z Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

MSG IR 08. 7 um 06. 03. 2005 12: 00 % cc © METEOSAT

MSG IR 08. 7 um 06. 03. 2005 12: 00 % cc © METEOSAT lm total cloud cover lm medium cloud cover lm high cloud cover lm_z medium cloud cover lm_z high cloud cover Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 lm_z total cloud cover lm low cloud cover lm_z low cloud cover

LM LM_Z 12 h Accumulated Precipitation for March 6 2005 06 to 18 UTC.

LM LM_Z 12 h Accumulated Precipitation for March 6 2005 06 to 18 UTC. The initial conditions are from the Global Model of DWD (00 UTC analysis, 24 hr forecast). Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

March 6 2005 March 7 2005 March 8 2005 R: 12 h forecasted accumulated

March 6 2005 March 7 2005 March 8 2005 R: 12 h forecasted accumulated precipitation from “Regular” LM is closer to observation Z: 12 h forecasted accumulated precipitation from LM_Z is closer to observation Precipitation Scores . Z R March 6 2005 Offenbach 11. 3. 2003 March 7 2005 . R Z March 8 2005

Total and average observed and forecasted precipitation height (mm) March 06 March 07 March

Total and average observed and forecasted precipitation height (mm) March 06 March 07 March 08 Observed: Total Average 10. 52 <0. 18> 152. 00 <2. 82> 78. 01 <1. 37> LM: Total Average 145. 99 <2. 52> 304. 56 <5. 64> 266. 06 <4. 67> LM_Z: Total Average 36. 87 <0. 64> 167. 82 <3. 11> 155. 57 <2. 73> Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

March 06 2005 mm 0 mm March 07 2005 Station # 0 Station #

March 06 2005 mm 0 mm March 07 2005 Station # 0 Station # mm March 08 2005 0 LM_Z LM OBS Station # • Observed and Forecasted Precipitation Heights (06 -18 UTC) from LM_Z and LM. • Columns below 0 th horizontal correspond to no observed or forecasted precipitation. • Stations with no precipitation shown correspond to traces of observed but no forecasted precipitation. Offenbach 11. 3. 2003

Conclusions • Results concerning the vertical velocity are very different • The cases computed

Conclusions • Results concerning the vertical velocity are very different • The cases computed so far show a substantial improvement of precipitation forecasts Offenbach 11. 3. 2003