Figure 1 Infrastructure map Figure 2 Uplandlowland interfaces

Figure 1. Infrastructure map

Figure 2. Upland-lowland interfaces

Figure 3. Biome interfaces

Figure 4. Thicket interfaces

Figure 5. Riverine corridors linking inland coastal biotas

Figure 6. Riverine corridors through mountainous terrain

Figure 7. Algoa dunefield with 500 m buffered inland boundary

Figure 8: Algoa dunefield with 2000 m buffered inland boundary

Figure 9. Rainfall gradients as drought refuges in drought-prone habitat

Figure 10. All ecological and evolutionary processes combined

Natural Grazed Agriculture Settlement Natural Estuary Figure 11. Current Land use in the planning domain

High density Medium density Low density GAENP Boundary Figure 12. The current extent of alien invasive plants

Figure 13. Restorability of the landscape

Darlington Dam Future threat weightings Medium High Figure 14. Composite threat weighting for each land class

Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 15. The distribution of grazing threats in the landscape

Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 16. The distribution of cultivation threats in the landscape

Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 17. The distribution of potential human settlement-related disturbance in the landscape

Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 18. The distribution of potential alien threats in the landscape

Figure 19. The percentage of intact area required by each landclass to meet its’ overall target

Figure 20 The extent of transformation of the spatially defined landscape processes in the GAENP planning domain

Figure 21. The existing reserve system (both statutory and non-statutory) and land earmarked for purchase within the GAENP planning domain. (Numbers on the map are referred to in the text. )

Figure 22. Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of primary level land classes.

Figure 23 Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of secondary level land classes.

Figure 24 Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of larger mammals.

Figure 25. Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of landscape level processes.

Figure 26 The distribution of upland-lowland biome interfaces in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

Figure 27. The distribution of thicket interfaces in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

Figure 28. The distribution of north-south and east-west riverine corridors in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

Figure 29. The distribution of sand-movement corridors in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

Figure 30. The distribution of drought refuge rainfall gradients in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

Figure 31. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving land class targets in the GAENP planning domain

Figure 32. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving mammals targets in the GAENP planning domain

Figure 33. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving process targets in the GAENP planning domain

Figure 34. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of statutory reserves (Step 1).

Figure 35. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of farm properties containing processes (Step 2).

Figure 36. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of rivers and the GAENP-MPA (Steps 3 and 4).

Figure 37. The notional conservation system for the GAENP planning domain derived from the set of criteria followed in Steps 1 -6.

Figure 38. Irreplaceability-vulnerability graph used to derive implementation priority.

Figure 39. Map showing implementation priorities within the GAENP planning domain.