FFIECs Call Report Modernization Project Overview of Call

FFIEC’s Call Report Modernization Project Overview of Call Report Modernization Project Martin Henning, FDIC CDR Project Manager Cindy Ayouch, FRB Chair, Financial Institutions Focus Group Gary Irving, Unisys Deputy Program Manager

Call Report Modernization Project Goals v Update the process by which Call Report data are defined, managed and used v Gain industry-wide efficiencies in the exchange of financial data by using the Internet and XML-based standards v Create an extensible platform for current and future reporting needs 2

Call Report Modernization Project v FFIEC Call Agencies Ø FDIC, FRB and OCC v Contract awarded to Unisys Team 5/03 Ø Partners: PWC, Microsoft, UBMatrix, Edgar Online, IDOM, V-Tech Solutions Ø Dave Hoffman and Raj Tewari, Unisys Partners Ø Cecilia Wu, Unisys Program Manager v System development will take about a year v Operational launch is anticipated for one of the first two Call Report periods of 2005. A specific date will be announced by the end of the year. 3

What is Changing? v Moving from agency-focused to industryfocused for the long view v Shifting from form-centric to data-centric v Shifting from proprietary standards to open standards v Reducing redundancies among agencies using centralized facility 4

What are the Business Issues? v Decrease the time between the receipt of data and the release of data to the public v Decrease the cost of data collection for all parties v Improve data transparency through defined open standards v Create a flexible system that can accommodate evolving business needs v Provide best information and tools to help financial institutions meet their obligations for submitting timely and accurate reports 5

Why XBRL for Call Reports? v Provides foundation data for bank supervision and industry analysis v Data structures are well-documented Ø More than 8, 300 institutions report quarterly Ø Currently collect 2, 000 data fields Ø Nearly 400 pages of instructions Ø 1, 500 edit formulas to promote data quality v Promotes effective data exchanges across legacy systems without significant reprogramming 6

Major Business Model Changes - Agencies v What’s New Ø Centralized data storage and processing facility § Shared costs and management § Meta-data published in XBRL format § Historical data available for banks and vendors § Expedited data publication v What’s the Same § Timely and accurate Call Report requirements § Customer service for requirements; exceptions and accounting rules 7

Major Business Model Changes - Banks v What’s New Ø Elimination of paper-based meta-data materials (forms, instructions, validation criteria) Ø Pre-validation of data required § Math and logic errors eliminated before processing § Quality edit variances require explanation Ø Internet delivery of data to CDR Ø More responsibility for amended data v What’s the Same Ø Ultimate responsibility for data Ø Relationship with software providers Ø Little or no impact on legacy systems 8

Major Business Model Changes - Vendors v What’s New Ø Ø Ø Meta-data management process centralized XBRL inputs and outputs Support pre-validation requirement Support reporter authentication, authorization and file format Historical data available for edits Potential for cost savings over time (ease of update, reusability) v What’s the Same Ø Continue to provide software and services Ø Ability to leverage processes and services to customers 9

Expected Results v Faster exchange of data between banks and FFIEC Call Agencies v Resources shared more effectively among FFIEC Call Agencies v Easier accommodation of Call Report changes v Long-term potential to facilitate bankers’ reuse of data among multiple regulatory and internal reporting needs v Provides structure for automating straight-through processing 10

Benefits for Bankers and Vendors v XBRL can help lower long-term costs Ø Improved data quality and timeliness Ø Vendor products easier to maintain and leverage v XBRL frameworks are extensible Ø Developing additional frameworks can be simplified when data requirements are shared v Many institutions report similar data to federal, state and local governments Ø Consolidate efforts in the future 11

Focus Groups v Facilitates communication and coordination with major stakeholders. v Four major Focus Groups: Ø XBRL Standards Group Ø Technology Forecasting Group Ø Call Report Software Vendors Focus Group Ø Financial Institutions Focus Group 12

Bank Participation in the CDR Project v Financial Institutions Focus Group (FIFG) Ø Current membership Ø Purpose Ø Responsibilities 13

FIFG Current Membership Financial Institutions Focus Group FFIEC Unisys American Bankers Cindy Ayouch FFIEC Gary Irving Dave Hoffman Shaune Gokey Six Financial Institutions of Various Sizes Federal Reserve Banks Association Independent Association Community For Bankers Financial of America Technology Conference America’s of State Bank Community Supervisors Banker New York Clearinghouse 14

FIFG Purpose v Serve as a collaborative bridge between the CDR Project and the Financial Institution Community v Support two-way communication about the project v Identify potential problems early 15

FIFG Responsibilities v Collaborate 2 -3 hours per week v Actively participate in meetings v Assist with message development and delivery 16