Farmakologi Molecular Reseptor Receptor theory First postulated by
Farmakologi Molecular Reseptor
Receptor theory �First postulated by John Langley (1878) ◦ Established after his experiments using nicotine and curare analogues on muscle contraction. �Isolated muscle fibers: pilocarpine (contraction) and atropine (inhibition). �Two compounds competing for a third, but unknown substrate. �Furthered by Paul Ehrlich (1854 -1915) ◦ Demonstrated that stereoselectivity was imperative in drug-receptor signaling.
John Langley �Langley concluded that a protoplasmic "receptive substance" must exist which the two drugs compete for directly. He further added that the effect of combination of the receptive substance with competing drugs was determined by their comparative chemical affinities for the substance and relative dose.
Intercellular Signaling
Classes of cell-surface receptors
Criteria for hormone-mediated events • Receptor must possess structural and steric specificity for a hormone and for its close analogs as well. • Receptors are saturable and limited (i. e. there is a finite number of binding sites). • Hormone-receptor binding is cell specific in accordance with target organ specificity. • Receptor must possess a high affinity for the hormone at physiological concentrations. • Once a hormone binds to the receptor, some recognizable early chemical event must occur.
� Affinity: The tenacity by which a drug binds to its receptor. ◦ Discussion: a very lipid soluble drug may have irreversible effects; is this high-affinity or merely a non-specific effect? � Intrinsic activity: Relative maximal effect of a drug in a particular tissue preparation when compared to the natural, endogenous ligand. ◦ Full agonist – IA = 1 (*equal to the endogenous ligand) ◦ Antagonist – IA = 0 ◦ Partial agonist – IA = 0~1 (*produces less than the maximal response, but with maximal binding to receptors. ) � Intrinsic efficacy: a drugs ability to bind a receptor and elicit a functional response ◦ A measure of the formation of a drug-receptor complex. � Potency: ability of a drug to cause a measured functional change.
Receptors have two major properties: Recognition and Transduction Recognition: The receptor protein must exist in a conformational state that allows for recognition and binding of a compound and must satisfy the following criteria: � Saturability – receptors exists in finite numbers. � Reversibility – binding must occur non-covalently due to weak intermolecular forces (H-bonding, van der Waal forces). � Stereoselectivity – receptors should recognize only one of the naturally occurring optical isomers (+ or -, d or l, or S or R). � Agonist specificity – structurally related drugs should bind well, while physically dissimilar compounds should bind poorly. � Tissue specificity – binding should occur in tissues known to be sensitive to the endogenous ligand. Binding should occur at physiologically relevant concentrations.
The failure of a drug to satisfy any of these conditions indicates nonspecific binding to proteins or phospholipids in places like blood or plasma membrane components.
Receptors have two major properties: Recognition and Transduction: The second property of a receptor is that the binding of an agonist must be transduced into some kind of functional response (biological or physiological). Different receptor types are linked to effector systems either directly or through simple or more-complex intermediate signal amplification systems. Some examples are: �Ligand-gated ion channels – nicotinic Ach receptors �Single-transmembrane receptors – RTKs like insulin or EGF receptors � 7 -transmembrane GPCRs – opioid receptors �Soluble steroid hormones – estrogen receptor
Predicting whether a drug will cause a response in a particular tissue Factors involving the equilibrium of a drug at a receptor. �Limited diffusion �Metabolism �Entrapment in proteins, fat, or blood. Response depends of what the receptor is connected to. �Effector type �Need for any allosteric co-factors – THB on tyrosine hydroxylase. �Direct receptor modification – phosphorylation
Receptor theory and receptor binding. Must obey the Law of Mass Action and follow basic laws of thermodynamics. �Primary assumption – a single ligand is binding to a homogeneous population of receptors NH+3 COO-
kon/k 1 [ligand] + [receptor] [ligand receptor] k off/k 2 � kon = # of binding events/time (Rate of association) = [ligand] [receptor] kon = M-1 min-1 � koff = # of dissociation events/time (Rate of dissociation) = [ligand receptor] koff = min-1 � Binding occurs when ligand receptor collide with the proper orientation and energy. � Interaction is reversible. � Rate of formation [L] + [R] or dissociation [LR] depends solely on the number of receptors, the concentration of ligand, and the rate constants kon and koff.
Receptor occupancy, activation of target cell responses, kinetics of binding • Activation of membrane receptors and target cell responses is proportional to the degree of receptor occupancy. • However, the hormone concentration at which half of the receptors is occupied by a ligand (Kd) is often lower than the concentration required to elicit a halfmaximal biological response (ED 50)
Assumptions of the law of mass action. �All receptors are equally accessible to ligand. �No partial binding occurs; receptors are either free of ligand or bound with ligand. �Ligand is nor altered by binding �Binding is reversible �Different affinity states? ? ?
Competition binding assays � Allows one to determine a rough estimate of an unlabeled ligand’s affinity for a receptor. � Competitive or non-competitive. � Introduction into the incubation mixture of a nonradioactive drug (e. g. drug B) that also binds to R will result in less of R being available for binding with D*, thus reducing the amount of [D*R] that forms. This second drug essentially competes with D* for occupation of R. Increasing concentrations of B result in decreasing amounts of [D * R] being formed. � Method: ◦ Single concentration of labeled ligand ◦ Multiple (log-scale) concentrations of the unlabeled/competing ligand.
Competition binding assays � The concentration of inhibitor which displaces 50% of the radiolabeled ligand is known as the IC 50 for that drug. � IC 50 cannot be viewed as the “KD” of the inhibitor because it is just an estimate. � Ki = the equilibrium inhibitor dissociation constant. ◦ It is the concentration of the competing ligand that would bind to 50% of sites in the absence of the radioligand. � Ki can only be determined after the IC 50 is known. � Uses the equation of Cheng and Prusoff. Ki = IC 50 1 + [radiolabeled ligand] Kd
Receptor antagonists. �Prevent agonist-mediated responses by preventing a drug from binding and eliciting its normal response. �Intrinsic activity = 0. �No sensitivity to Na+ or GTP. �Antagonists are measured by the selectivity, affinity for their receptor, and potency.
Irreversible antagonists. �Binds in an irreversible manner, usually by covalent modification of the receptor. �EEDQ (non-selective) �N-ethylmalemide (NEM) or other sulfhydryl or alkylating agents (non-selective). �Antibodies �Molecular control (mutation) – EXAMPLE �Prevents binding at the atomic level. �Effectively and practically lowers the number of receptors capable of binding an agonist. �Adding more agonist is useless �Only cure: Make New Receptors by Protein Synthesis.
Receptor subtypes 100 First learned for the histamine % response receptor. ◦ histamine activation by 50 agonist produces smooth muscle contraction. � The residual activity in gastric secretion, even in the absence of muscle contraction, indicated 0 the presence of histaminesensitive receptors. � Conclusion = Receptor Subtypes. ◦ Receptor subtypes are characterized by: ◦ Binding differences (selective ligands) ◦ Function ◦ Molecular cloning analysis revealing amino acid differences. � contraction Gastric secretion Contraction + antagonist . 001 . 01 1 10 100 Log [histamine] 1000
Opioid receptor subtypes Receptor type µ-Receptor m 1, m 2, m 3 ? ? d -Receptor d 1, d 2 ? ? k -Receptor k 1, k 2 ? ? Selective agonists endomorphin-1 endomorphin-2 DAMGO [D-Ala 2]-deltorphin II DPDPE SNC 80 DSLET enadoline U-50488 U-69593 Selective antagonists CTAP naltrindole TIPP-y ICI 174864 nor-binaltorphimine
Stopping the GPCR signal �Endogenous GTPase within Ga subunit �Proteolysis of receptor-rare �NT re-uptake or enzymolysis �RGS proteins-regulators of GTPase �Receptor internalization/downregulation.
Receptor desensitization �A loss of agonist affinity, but not receptor number after chronic agonist stimulation. ◦ ◦ ◦ - Best example is b 2 -AR. Activation of PKA/GRKs Phosphorylation b-arrestin � uncoupling � results in a of receptor and G-protein rightward shift of the binding curve: DESENSITIZATION. � KD of isoproterenol (1 100 n. M) goes up ◦ affinity goes down ◦ number of receptors does not change (Bmax does not change). § b-arrestin binds with clathrin AP-2 binding site. ◦ Complex internalizes into membrane-bound endosomes. ◦ Endosomes internalizes ◦ transient decrease in surface receptor number.
Adapted from Lefkowitz, 1998 (JBC, vol. , 273)
Receptor down-regulation �Proteolytic degradation of receptor ◦ producing a net loss in total cell receptor number. �PKC involvement during endocytosis �Bmax can decreases (~60%); KD remains the same �Use of endosomes and lysosomes.
- Slides: 28