Fall 2013 PDD Accreditation Overview Just Completed a

Fall 2013 PDD Accreditation Overview Just Completed a Report and were Reaffirmed… Why Another Report ? !

ACCJC Standards The Standards: Four Parts Standard 1: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness Standard 2: Student Learning Programs and Services Standard 3: Resources Standard 4: Leadership and Governance Work together; interrelated Facilitates the dialogue on the institution’s effectiveness and on ways in which it may improve. The self-study provides the commission with the institutional assessment of itself as a whole.

The Process: Annual Reports Enrollment Number of courses Distance Education Comprehensive Report Annual Reports Transfer information Financial Student Learning Outcomes Annual Reports College meets Standards Eligibility Requirements Commission Policies Narrative Evidence External Evaluation Team Visit Midterm Report Annual Reports Comprehensive Report College addresses Progress since Comprehensive Report Deficiencies Resolved Status of Improvement Plans (formerly Planning Agenda) Narrative Evidence

Process and Timeline Six-Year Cycle Comprehensive Report 2010 Annual & Follow Up Reports 2011 Annual & Follow Up Reports 2012 Midterm Report Annual Reports 2013 Annual Reports Comprehensive Report 2016 2013 Accreditation Midterm Report Timeline April Assemble work teams. May First rough draft to college by May 20 if possible June Review input from rough draft and revise report. Template in place Begin writing PDD Campus-wide Vetting/Workshop Begin gathering evidence. July Continue editing; gather evidence; create hard copies August Finalize report and check all evidence links. Board Update August 13, 2013 September 2 nd Campus-wide Vetting/Discussion with the constituency groups 1 st Board reading – September 24, 2013 Approval? October 2 nd Reading to the Board for approval October 8, 2013 Fed. Ex copies to ACCJC by October 11, 2013

EVC Midterm Update 2010 Recommendation 2 The team recognizes that progress has occurred with identification of course level student learning outcomes; however, the team recommends that efforts be accelerated to complete SLO identification and expand recurrent cycles of authentic assessment and improvement for all instructional and student services programs, with campus-wide dialogue on results, in order to reach proficiency level by 2012. Furthermore, faculty and others directly responsible for student progress towards achieving student learning outcomes should have, as a component of their evaluation, effectiveness in producing those learning outcomes.

EVC Update Cont. Purchase SLO Software (Curric. UNET Meta with supplemental SLO Assessment Tracking and Program Review Modules) SLO Evaluation Component Campus-wide discussions and forums Constituent Meetings Accreditation Steering Committee Meetings

SLO Progress Fall ‘ 12 PDD 58% SS 60% 26% Programs Fall ’ 13 PDD 92% Courses 21% 41% 65% SS 80% 54% Programs 96% Courses 29% 88%

ILO Updates Mapping NAH 44% MSE/BWF 31% LA 41% SS 29% SSHAPE 20% Assessment 2012 12/13 13/14 • ILO 3: Information Competency • ILO 4: Social Responsibility • ILO 2: Inquiry Reasoning: data analysis underway • ILO 1: Communication • ILO 5: Personal Development

SLO: Future Plans Progress to pink assessment loop PDD activities Semester assessment/analysis/documentation Reassess & document Community Dialogue Curriculum Management System Curric. UNET Meta + SLO + PR Modules Training to start Spring 2014

Thank You Questions?