Facilitators of School Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane
- Slides: 64
Facilitators of School Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer October 2014
Keys to Student Engagement and The 7 C’s Student Motivation Scavenger Hunt
4 (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement At your table designate each participant as Reader A, B, C or D. Each participant will read: • the introduction (pg. 1 through table on pg. 2) • the summary (pg. 5 beginning with “The Four Keys”) And one of the four • Reader A: Key 1 (pg. 2) • Reader B: Key 2 (pg. 3) • Reader C: Key 3 (pg. 4) • Reader D: Key 4 (pg. 5)
4 (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement Scavenger Hunt Use the Seven C’s of Effective Teaching table to make connections to the Four (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement. Using the Four Keys as categories, sort the ‘Dimensions’ from the 7 C’s table into the categories. Use the ‘Example Items’ in the 7 C’s table as well as the information in the Reading to guide your work. Record your thoughts on the handout.
Today’s Outcomes • Read Four Keys to Student Engagement, by Robyn Jackson • and Ex Allison Zmuda • Receive Important Updates • Examine the NEW SI and DI Frameworks • Deconstruct your Program Evaluation Strategy • Receive MDE Assessment and Accountability Updates for 2014 -15 • Explore MI School Data, Data Director, and Macombfsi. net 7
Today’s Roadmap • Welcome and Review • Connector: Four Keys to Student Engagement, article • Updates: Changes and What’s New? • • • Professional Learning Save the Dates MDE and Advanc. ED At-Risk 31 A ASSIST • Program Evaluation Diagnostic • Assessment and Accountability Update • MI School Data, Data Director, and Macombfsi. net • Program Evaluation Team Work 8
Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool • Respect all Points of View • Be Present and Engaged • Honor Time Agreements • Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values 9
Parking Lot A Facilitation Tool • Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group • Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time • Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time 10
Action Required Chart • Any request by you that I need to respond to must be placed on the Action Required Chart • You need to PRINT your complete name, school, and email address 11
FSI Materials • New to FSI • Notebook • Plastic Folder • FSI Bag • All Participants • Journal with removable tabs • Visible Learning for Teachers, John Hattie • Flashdrive • FSI website will hold all templates and resources for this series 12
FSI Journal Assembly Place your name in the Book • Count off three pages and place one removable tab labeled • Stage One Step 1 Get Ready • Count 8 pages and place a same colored tab, labeled • Stage One Step 2 Collect Data • Count 8 pages and place a same colored tab, labeled • Stage One Step 3 Build Profile • Count 8 pages and place a DIFFERENT colored tab, labeled • Stage Two, Step 4 Analyze Data • Follow the pattern and label each step (11). Remember to CHANGE the color of the tabs when you begin STAGE THREE and STAGE FOUR. 13
Principal Resource Packet • OFS District Monthly Activity Organizer • Spring 2015 Testing Schedule (latest) • Advanc. ED eleot (classroom observations) • Advanc. ED Team Member Invitation for MI • Guided Reading Strategy Implementation Guide • Education Leadership: How to Drive Motivation 14
FSI Website www. macombfsi. net Facilitators of School Improvement • • FSI Series: PPTS, Agendas and Calendar MDE School Reporting Requirements MDE District Reporting Requirements FSI Series Handouts by Stage and Step School Data Resources: MI School Data and Data Director School Improvement Timelines District Office Corner Principal’s Corner 15
16
MI-CSI Process Cycle An nu al E Re duc po at ion rt pro m I l oo Plan Sch ent m e v l oo Sch D ata An Go als & Pl sis y l a an s
Making Connections Comprehensive Needs Assessment Where are we now? School Improvement Plan Where do we want to go and how are we going to get there? Annual Education Report How did we do?
The Big Picture
Process and Products Stage Processes GATHER • • • Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile Products • • School Process Profile* School Data Profile School Data Analysis (SDA)* School Process Profile Analysis • • Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices • PLAN • Develop improvement plan • Develop strategies • Develop activities • School Improvement Plan DO • • • Implement the Plan Monitor the Plan Evaluate the Plan • Program Evaluation Tool* Annual Education Report STUDY • • *Diagnostic in ASSIST
Important Updates • Priority, Focus, and Reward Schools • Professional Learning Opportunities • MDE ‘Save the Dates’ and Due Dates • SI and DI Frameworks • Advanc. ED and ASSIST • At-Risk Pupils 21
Priority, Focus & Reward Schools • Support to Priority and Focus Schools • Top to Bottom List 2015 -16 • No new schools named 2015 -16 22
Professional Learning Opportunities MISD Sponsored www. macombisd. net • The Macomb ISD has a plethora of professional learning opportunities listed in courseware. Search by month or content. Recommended by MISD Flyers and Brochures • Flyers and brochures will be placed on the shelving in the back of the room to my left. 23
Save the Dates • Advanc. ED Conference (2 -days) November 6 and 7, 2014 Suburban Collection Showplace, NOVI • OEII School Improvement Conference November 17 and 18, 2014 Lansing Center, LANSING • NEW School Improvement Framework (26 quality indicators) • NEW District Improvement Framework (10 quality indicators) • 4 Models of Educator Effectiveness • Student Learning Outcomes • School Culture and Climate • Special Education 24
handout District Improvement Framework District Systems Review (DSR) 10 Indicators W E N 25
handout School Improvement Framework School Systems Review (SSR) 26 Indicators W E N 26
2014 -15 External Review At a Glance Index of Educational Quality • IEQ - 3 Domains Effective Learning Environment Observation Tool • eleot 29
Advanc. ED Updates • Team Member Invitation 30
External Review Structure 2014 -15 31
The IEQ is Real! 32
The IEQ is Real! 33
eleot 34
2014 -15 Accreditation Labels NEW Advanc. ED IN OUT Accredited on Review Probation Warned Advisement Advanc. Ed takes all the IEQ index scores in the nation and rank orders them. If your school falls in the bottom 5% for the NATION, additional reviewing will be conducted by Advanc. ED. 35
handout In This Issue: Program Evaluation Tool (task has arrived) ASSIST 6. 0 New Administrators (make sure EEM is updated) QUICK GUIDE LOG onto the System 36
www. advanc-ed. org/partnership/mde Scroll Down to find TABS W E N
NEW LOOK for RESOURCES W E N 38
At-Risk Populations: 31 -A Funding Changes • Legislation • FAQ’s • Worksheets • K-3 • 4 -12
At-Risk Populations: 31 -A Funding Changes • Legislation
At-Risk Populations: 31 -A Funding Changes • Legislation
At-Risk Populations: 31 -A Funding Changes • Unallowable Uses of Funds
At-Risk Populations: 31 -A Funding Changes • Companion Document/Notes
Stage Three: Plan Stage Four: Do PLAN Develop Improvement Plan Develop Strategies Develop Activities DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan 44
Stage Four Step 11
Program Evaluation Timeline 46
One, Evaluating the Fidelity of Implementation Did the strategy work? qimplemented as intended? qimplemented consistently and with fidelity? qenough time and resources available and used for implementation?
Two, Evaluating Impact: Student Achievement q increased student achievement? q unintended consequences (good and bad)? q be continued? discontinued? modified? Demographics School Processes Student Outcomes Perception
Deconstruct a STRATEGY at the ACTIVITY Level 49
Program Evaluation STRATEGY • Open your envelop and ONLY take out the colored blank cards labeled Getting Ready Readiness, Getting Ready Knowledge and Skills Getting Ready 1. Readiness 2. Knowledge & Skills 3. Opportunity Implement Monitor Evaluate 50
Deconstructing Directions 51
Creating the BOARD Use the headers and descriptor cards in your envelop to create a LIVE BOARD. Continue 52
Deconstruct a STRATEGY at the ACTIVITY Level Step Three • Divide the cards among the team and provide time for each person to read the activity to the team. In round robin fashion, each person places their activity under the header/descriptor THEY BELIEVE it best fits and share out the rationale for placement. At this time, the team does not provide assistance or input. Once the last activity card has been placed begin a dialogue if a participants believes a card is better placed under a different header/descriptor. Once the dialogue is complete and consensus is reached the team is ready for the next step. HINT: 1 -4 activity cards (5 -10 minute dialogue, 5 -10 activity cards 10 -15 minute dialogue and so on) 53
Deconstruct a STRATEGY at the ACTIVITY Level 54
Stage Four Step 11
What Worked Well? q strategy was or wasn’t implemented with fidelity? q implementation adhered to strategies, timelines and responsibilities? q impact on student achievement and what is the evidence? q Impact on subgroups and what is the evidence?
Look at your ACTIVITY CARDS and answer this question: do these activities create a blue print for staff to follow? q Readiness? q Knowledge and skill? q Opportunity? q Implemented as intended?
Blue Print Make Decisions about ACTIVITIES Additional ACTIVITIES Discontinue Revise Cont inue Keep as is
DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan • Identify the additional activities needed to conduct Program Evaluation • Create a PE Strategy addendum in ASSIST • Label: June 2015 Program Evaluation Strategy Addendum • Complete page one of the Program Evaluation Diagnostic in ASSIST 59
Accountability and Assessment Update Presenter Dr. Jim Gullen 60
Four Step REFLECTION PROCESS Tool 61
Storyboard Tool 62
STUDY Analyze Data GATHER Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Presenter: Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore MISchooldata. org Data Director 63
Team Work Time • Identify the additional activities needed to conduct Program Evaluation • Create an addendum PE Goal • Complete page one of the Program Evaluation Diagnostic in ASSIST • Network with Colleagues 64
- Roberto asaro
- Virginia mathematics pathways initiative
- Promotion industry
- External facilitators advertising
- Alexis deane
- Deane neubauer
- Jeremy deane
- Rob deane
- Bryan deane abpi
- Shaala siddhi school improvement plan example
- Swot analysis for school improvement plan
- Strategic school improvement fund round 3
- Identify priority improvement areas
- School improvement plan michigan
- Strategic school improvement fund round 3
- School improvement plan
- School strengths and weaknesses list
- Strategic school improvement fund round 3
- Raleigh charter high school lisa huddleston
- Work improvement teams
- Trial and improvement
- Four improvement strategies in tqm
- Together towards improvement
- When was the progressive era? *
- Fha title 1 home improvement loan
- Performance improvement plan examples
- Charlie company mottos jrotc
- Social skills improvement system rating scales
- Jhm irb
- Qsen quality improvement examples
- Quality improvement paradigm
- Continuous improvement
- Continuous quality improvement plan example
- Pocqi ppt
- Physician consortium for performance improvement
- Performance improvement survey
- Define continuous quality improvement
- Aimsweb plus reports
- Outpatient clinical documentation improvement
- Ohio state health assessment
- Total quality management seminar
- Nsla
- If you cant measure it you can't manage it
- Hod management plan template
- Managing for daily improvement
- 1 improvement per day
- 7 step improvement process
- Search by image
- Rapid improvement model
- Focus on attendance
- Improving software economics in software project management
- Illinois crop improvement
- Ibm checkpoint goals examples
- Florida continuous improvement model
- Leasehold improvement
- Efmd quality improvement system
- 4 blocker
- Cip continuous improvement program
- Quality improvement vs quality assurance
- Clinical documentation improvement for cardiology
- Iterative improvement algorithm example
- Capability maturity model improvement digunakan pada bagian
- Crop improvement in biotechnology
- Standard cmmi appraisal method for process improvement
- Work improvement in small enterprises