Facilitating UFE stepbystep a process guide for evaluators

Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a process guide for evaluators Module 2: Steps 4 -6 of UFE checklist https: //creativecommons. org/licenses/by-sa/4. 0/ Joaquín Navas & Ricardo Ramírez December, 2009

Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of steps 4 to 6 of the UFE checklist. The main goal is to suggest a process that can help UFE evaluators facilitate the formulation of key evaluation questions. (PLEASE READ THE NOTES SECTION OF THE DIFFERENT SLIDES). Please adapt this presentation to the context of the project that you are evaluating and to your facilitation style.

Meeting’s objectives 1. To review the most relevant topics of previous meeting(s) – comments on distributed report(s). 2. To formulate the first draft of the key evaluation questions.

Agenda 1. Summary and brief discussion on the previous meeting and/or report. 2. Group reflection on some of the discussed topics. 3. Break. 4. Formulation of key evaluation questions – first draft.

What have we achieved so far? 1. Common understanding among participants on basic UFE principles. 2. Stakeholder identification within the overall project. 3. Role definition within the evaluation process. 4. Identification of possible challenges of the evaluation process.

Review – Basic UFE principles 1. UFE is a PROCESS for helping primary intended users select the most appropriate content, model, methods, theory, and uses for their particular situation. 2. UFE is a COLLABORATIVE APPROACH that seeks to generate learning. 3. Evaluation should be JUDGED by its utility and USE in the real world. 4. Evaluation plan needs to be part of the INITIAL DESIGN of project. 5. The evaluator’s role is to COLLABORATE with those engaged in the design of the evaluation process.

Group reflection – Available resources… In the previous meeting you identified x, y, z, as the most limiting resources or factors of the evaluation process. Have you identified any other limiting resources/factors since that meeting? ¿Do you still think that the available resources are enough (or not enough) to carry out the evaluation process?

Group reflection – Stakeholders (1/4)… From the stakeholder groups that you identified in the previous meeting(s), what group(s) do you think you represent as primary intended users of the evaluation?

Identified stakeholders (from previous meetings) Group Stakeholder Group 1 Stakeholder Assigned role Stakeholder 1 Stakeholder 2 Stakeholder 3 Stakeholder Group 2 Stakeholder 4 Stakeholder 5 Stakeholder 6 Stakeholder Group 3 Stakeholder 7 Stakeholder 8 Primary intended user

Group reflection – stakeholders (3/4)… What key stakeholder groups are not represented by the primary intended user? Would there be any implications on the use of the evaluation as a result of not having these stakeholder groups represented by the primary intended users? What would those implications be?

Group reflection – Stakeholders (4/4)… Can you think of any political factors within the project that could affect the use of the evaluation?

Group reflection – previous experience (1/3) In previous meeting(s) you made the following comments regarding your previous evaluation experiences: X, Y, Z. What did you learn from those experiences?

Group reflection – previous experience (2/3) Suppose that at the beginning of this project you had the required resources and total freedom for implementing or not implementing a formal evaluation plan. What factors would have discouraged you about implementing the evaluation plan? Why?

Group reflection – previous experience (3/3) What would have motivated you to implement the evaluation plan? Why?

Group reflection – evaluation utility (1/3) Do you think that this evaluation process can contribute to program improvement? How?

Reflection – evaluation utility (2/3)… Do you think that this evaluation process can contibute to making major decisions? How?

Group reflection – evaluation utility (3/3) Do you think that this evaluation process can contribute to the generation of knowledge? How?

Group reflection – critical dates… What are your expectations regarding the completion date of this evaluation? Can you think of any milestone dates that could be critical or useful to have in mind for major decision-making throughout the project subject of this evaluation?

BREAK

FORMULATION OF KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS FIRST APPROACH

What is the purpose of the evaluation?

The trajectory of change… INPUT / RESOURCES ▼ ACTIVITIES ▼ OUPUTS ▼ OUTCOMES ▼ IMPACT / RESULTS C O N T R O L & ? P R E D I C T I O N

The evaluation’s purpose According to Patton (2008) evaluation can be oriented towards different purposes based on the findings’ primary intended USES.

MENU OF INTENDED USES (1/2) Evaluation Purposes Primary intended uses Typical primary users “To provide data for judging the overall value of a program and deciding whether it is worth continuing with it or not” (p. 114). Those charged with making major decisions: funders, directors, other adopters of model, etc. Formative improvement & learning “To provide data for program improvement” (p. 116). Program administrators, staff, those involved in the day-to-day management. Knowledge generating “To look across findings from different programs to identify patterns of effectiveness” (p. 131). Program designers, planners, modelers, theorists, scholars, policy-makers. Overall summative judgment

MENU OF ITENDED USES (2/2) Purposes Intended primary uses Typical primary users Organization / Program Development “To provide data for adapting interventions to emergent conditions” (p. 137). Social innovators, those involved in bringing about major systems change in dynamic environments. Accountability “To provide data for describing and explaining achievements” (p. 121). Those with administrative and funding authority, responsible for resource use. “To provide information about key areas that require managerial attention” (Pg 126). Program managers responsible for internal accountability and information system management (Adaptaded from Patton Monitoring p. 139 – Ch. . 4).

Formulation of key evaluation questions

What makes good KEQs? (adapted from Dart, 2007) • Specific enough to be useful in guiding you through the evaluation • Broad enough to be broken down - are not the same as a question in a survey • Data (qualitative/quantitative) can be brought to bear on the KEQ • KEQs are open questions (can’t answer yes or no!) • Have meaning for those developing the plan • Lead to useful, credible, evaluation • There aren’t too many of them (2 -4 is enough).

Categories of key evaluation questions INPUT / RESOURCES IMPACT OUTCOMES APPROACH / MODEL PROCESS QUALITY COST- EFFECTIVENESS

Linking KEQ to the project objectives List the specific project objectives here…

Conclusion and next steps

Next steps (for the evaluator only)

References Dart, J. 2007. “Key evaluation questions”. Presentation at the Evaluation in Practice Workshop. Kualal Lumpur, December. http: //evaluationinpractice. files. wordpress. com/2008/01/keyqu estionschoices. pdf Patton, M. Q. (2008) Utilization focused evaluation, 4 th Edition. Sage.