Extreme Solar Eruptions Sources and Consequences Nat Gopalswamy

  • Slides: 36
Download presentation
Extreme Solar Eruptions: Sources and Consequences Nat Gopalswamy Solar Physics Laboratory NASA/GSFC ICTP/ISWI Workshop

Extreme Solar Eruptions: Sources and Consequences Nat Gopalswamy Solar Physics Laboratory NASA/GSFC ICTP/ISWI Workshop May 20 -24, 2019

What is an Extreme Event? • Event on the tail of a distribution of

What is an Extreme Event? • Event on the tail of a distribution of interest • An occurrence singularly unique either in the occurrence itself or in terms of its consequences • Occurrence: CME, flare (active region size, magnetic content) • Consequences: SEP events, Magnetic storms • Tail: The physics does not change

What can we learn from the study of tails (caudology? ) …

What can we learn from the study of tails (caudology? ) …

… about the whole animal? David B. Stephenson 2005

… about the whole animal? David B. Stephenson 2005

CME – Flare Relationship • Two manifestations of the energy release from magnetic regions

CME – Flare Relationship • Two manifestations of the energy release from magnetic regions on the Sun • Sometimes flares occur without CMEs • CMEs are always accompanied by flares (sometimes flare signatures may not be seen due to instrument sensitivity) • Big flares accompany energetic CMEs • Both CMEs and flares cause SEPs, but flare SEP events are small • Flares do not cause geomagnetic storms; CMEs do (Gosling 1993)

Confined vs. Eruptive Flares • Confined: generally a single loop • Eruptive: - associated

Confined vs. Eruptive Flares • Confined: generally a single loop • Eruptive: - associated with erupting prominence - CME, shock - type II radio burst - two - ribbon flares - Post-eruption arcade • ~ 20% of ≥M 5. 0 flares are not accompanied by CMEs • Confined flares are hotter than eruptive ones • Both confined and eruptive flares produce hard X-ray and microwave bursts • No EUV waves found in confined flares • No upward energetic electrons (lack of metric or longer wavelength type III, type II bursts) in confined flares • No SEP events

Confined Flare: No mass motion X 1. 5 Flare Confined flares just produce excess

Confined Flare: No mass motion X 1. 5 Flare Confined flares just produce excess photons No mass motion

An Eruptive Event Manifests as CME + Flare SOHO/LASCO & EIT Difference Images overlaid

An Eruptive Event Manifests as CME + Flare SOHO/LASCO & EIT Difference Images overlaid Flare EUV WAVE Flares have prompt effect on the ionosphere X 1. 5 Shock CMEs can result in daytime TEC increase (1 -4 days later) Gosling 1993, solar flare myth JGRA 98, 18937

A very weak flare Flare seen as an extended structure in soft X-ray images.

A very weak flare Flare seen as an extended structure in soft X-ray images. A-class flare barely seen in the soft X-ray light curve The image obtained in the energy channel 0. 25 – 4 ke. V (2 – 50 Å)

293 km/s; 15. 9 m/s/s SC Oct 10 18 UT Dst min Oct 11

293 km/s; 15. 9 m/s/s SC Oct 10 18 UT Dst min Oct 11 4 UT (-130 n. T) Zhang et al. 2007

A Solar Eruption: CME, Flare, SEP, Shock, Radio Burst, Magnetic Storm Source Location N

A Solar Eruption: CME, Flare, SEP, Shock, Radio Burst, Magnetic Storm Source Location N 11 E 12 1689 km/s ESP 100 3000 pfu SEP Shock Halo CME 33 h Sun Type II Burst (DH –km) Earth shock SSC Storm UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop 11

Historical Fast Transit Events 27 23 Jul 2012 01: 50 S 17 W 141

Historical Fast Transit Events 27 23 Jul 2012 01: 50 S 17 W 141 ? ? 18. 6 2330 Cliver et al. , 1990; Gopalswamy et al. , 2005

CME Source Regions Photospheric Magnetogram A B A: active region B: Filament region (also

CME Source Regions Photospheric Magnetogram A B A: active region B: Filament region (also bipolar, but no sunspots) Chromosphere (H-alpha) A B Both regions have filaments along the polarity inversion line

Where does the energy come from? Extrapolated field lines on TRACE 171 A coronal

Where does the energy come from? Extrapolated field lines on TRACE 171 A coronal images 2005/05/13 14: 56: 00 Photospheric magnetogram with potential field extrapolation a 2005/05/13 15: 25: 56 b Actual coronal structure is “distorted” from potential field free energy (FE) Distortion due to current J. Lorentz force Jx. B propels the CME 2005/05/13 21: 26: 36 c Free energy went into the CME kinetic energy Arcade is now almost potential (very little current J) De Rosa & Schrijver

Flare Size in X-rays (1 – 8 Å) SOLRAD, GOES Data since 1969 •

Flare Size in X-rays (1 – 8 Å) SOLRAD, GOES Data since 1969 • The corrected size of the 2003/11/03 Flare: X 34–X 48, mean ~ X 40 (Brodrick et al. 2005) • Carrington flare size: X 42 – X 48, nominal value of X 45 (Cliver and Dietrich 2013) • Weibull distribution: X 43. 9 (100 -year); X 101 (1000 -year) • Power law distribution: similar flare sizes: X 42 and X 115 • X 100 1033 erg • A 1034 erg flare can occur once in 125, 000 yr A B C M X X 100 The 4 November 2003 flare at 19: 29 UT has the highest intensity of 2. 8 x 10 -3 W m-2 (X 28).

CME Speed and Kinetic Energy 100: 3800 km/s 1000: 4700 km/s 100: 4. 4×

CME Speed and Kinetic Energy 100: 3800 km/s 1000: 4700 km/s 100: 4. 4× 1033 erg 1000: 9. 8× 1033 erg

Sunspot Group Area • A 100 -year AR has an area of ~7000 msh

Sunspot Group Area • A 100 -year AR has an area of ~7000 msh (power law) and ~5900 msh (Weibull function) • Use a max values of 6000 msh for estimates • Max field strength ~6100 G (Livingston et al. 2006) • Max Potential energy ~ (B 2/8π)A 1. 5 = 3. 7× 1036 erg Maximum observed area was ~5000 msh (SC 18) in 143 yr

Max. CME Speed and Kinetic Energy from AR 3. 7× 1036 erg 6700 3600

Max. CME Speed and Kinetic Energy from AR 3. 7× 1036 erg 6700 3600 ~4. 2× 1035 11% eff Free energy ~ PE If FE>PE, the efficiency is higher • • Potential Energy = (<B>2/8π)A 1. 5 A = area covered by at least 10% of the peak unsigned magnetic field strength B <B> is the unsigned average field strength within A Active regions that produced SEP events, magnetic clouds or magnetic storms

AR Flux vs. Reconnected Flux • • B = 6100 G, A = 6000

AR Flux vs. Reconnected Flux • • B = 6100 G, A = 6000 msh (6000 x 3. 07× 1016 cm 2). AR flux ΦAR is ~1. 12× 1024 Mx. ΦRC = 0. 79ΦAR 0. 98 gives ΦRC ~2. 9× 1023 Mx, KE = 0. 19(ΦRC)1. 87 (Gopalswamy et al. 2017 SC 23 CMEs) gives KE = 7. 7× 1034 erg (not the maximum) Such events may occur once in ~6300 yr (from the KE distribution assuming power law)

Peak SEP Intensity 100: 2. 04× 105 pfu; 1000: 1. 02× 106 pfu

Peak SEP Intensity 100: 2. 04× 105 pfu; 1000: 1. 02× 106 pfu

Solar Cycle Variation

Solar Cycle Variation

SEP Source Regions on the Sun Confined to active region belt Western hemispheric preference

SEP Source Regions on the Sun Confined to active region belt Western hemispheric preference

CME Rate & SSN ? CME occurrence rate is closely correlated with SSN Inter-cycle

CME Rate & SSN ? CME occurrence rate is closely correlated with SSN Inter-cycle variation between CME rate and SSN CME rate per SSN 0. 02 (SC 23) vs. 0. 04 (SC 24)

CME Speed and Width Kinetic Energy ~1. 5× 1025 J Chicxulub Meteor: 1. 1×

CME Speed and Width Kinetic Energy ~1. 5× 1025 J Chicxulub Meteor: 1. 1× 1023 J

Significant CMEs & their Consequences Cycle 23 – 24 CMEs from SOHO/LASCO Gopalswamy, 2006;

Significant CMEs & their Consequences Cycle 23 – 24 CMEs from SOHO/LASCO Gopalswamy, 2006; 2010 m 2 – Metric type II MC – Magnetic Cloud EJ – Ejecta S – Interplanetary shock GM – Geomagnetic storm Halo – Halo CMEs DH – Type II at λ 10 -100 meters SEP – Solar Energetic Particles GLE – Ground Level Enhancement Plasma impact Energetic electrons Energetic protons p<10 -4

Fluence >30 Me. V >10 Me. V

Fluence >30 Me. V >10 Me. V

Integral Fluences for Different Model Fits (in units of 1010 p cm-2)

Integral Fluences for Different Model Fits (in units of 1010 p cm-2)

Fluence Spectra of Miyake Particle Events Scaled from 2005 January 20 GLE event •

Fluence Spectra of Miyake Particle Events Scaled from 2005 January 20 GLE event • 1000 -year fluences in the >10 Me. V and >30 Me. V ranges cover the AD 774/5 and AD 992/3 events • Two-point slopes consistent with those of the known SEP events • AD 774/5 and AD 992/3 events are consequences of SEP events • The 2012 July 23 Event shows that extreme events can occur in weak sunspot cycles 1956/2/23 1972/8/4 Miyake et al. 2013; Mekhaldi et al. 2015; Usoskin 2017; Gopalswamy et al. 2016

Out of the Ecliptic B from CMEs • Normal Parker-spiral field does not have

Out of the Ecliptic B from CMEs • Normal Parker-spiral field does not have a Bz component • CMEs with flux rope structure (magnetic clouds) naturally produce the Bz component • Magnetic field draping in the shock sheath can also cause Bz (Gosling & Mc. Comas, 1987; Tsurutani & Gonzalez, 1988) • Corotating interaction regions and fast wind have Alfven waves that represent Bz, but the magnitude is relatively small 29

Geomagnetic Storm and CME parameters Gopalswamy 2008 Dst [n. T] Dst = – 0.

Geomagnetic Storm and CME parameters Gopalswamy 2008 Dst [n. T] Dst = – 0. 01 VBz – 32 n. T The high correlation suggests That V and Bz are the most Important parameters ( - Bz is absolutely necessary) V and Bz in the IP medium are 4 n. T • km/s] V B [10 MC z related to the CME speed and magnetic content Carrington Event: VBz = 1. 6 105 n. T • km/s V = 2000 km/s, Dst = -1650 n. T Bz = -81 n. T 30

Origin of V and B Dst = – 0. 01 VBz – 32 n.

Origin of V and B Dst = – 0. 01 VBz – 32 n. T Solar Wind speed CIR Speed CME speed Active Region Free energy Alfven waves CIR: Amplified Alfven waves ICME: Sheath & Flux rope Heliospheric Mag Field Active Region Mag Field 31

Magnetic Storms • The Weibull distribution fits all the data points. • A 100

Magnetic Storms • The Weibull distribution fits all the data points. • A 100 -year event has a size of -603 n. T, consistent with the March 1989 event • A 1000 -year event has a size of -845 n. T, consistent with some estimates of the Carrington storm: • -1600 n. T (Tsurutani et al. 2003) • -850 n. T (Siscoe 2006) • -1160 n. T (Gonzalez et al. 2011) • -900 n. T (Cliver and Dietrich 2013) The empirical relation, Dst = -0. 01 VBz – 32 n. T can explain – 1160 n. T if V = 2000 km/s and Bz = -78 n. T Using Bt = 0. 06 VICME - 13. 58 n. T (Gopalswamy et al. 2017) And |Bz| = 0. 74 Bt , it is possible to get Bt =106 n. T and Bz = -78 n. T

The Carrington record may not be due to Ring current? Kumar et al. 2015

The Carrington record may not be due to Ring current? Kumar et al. 2015 JGR

Summary of 100 -year and 1000 -year Event Sizes

Summary of 100 -year and 1000 -year Event Sizes

Summary • Assuming extreme events to be events on the tails of cumulative distributions,

Summary • Assuming extreme events to be events on the tails of cumulative distributions, we estimated one-in-100 and one-in-1000 yr sizes • Weibull function used as the baseline in extrapolating the distributions to estimate the 100 -year and 1000 -year event sizes; Power-law distributions appear to yield overestimates • The >30 Me. V fluence of a 1000 -year event is in the range (1 -5)× 1010 p cm-2 • Consistent with the historical extreme event such as the Carrington event, the AD 774/75 event, the AD 994/95 event, and the recent 2012 July 23 backside event • The simple relation Dst = -0. 01 VBz – 32 n. T is adequate to estimate extreme storms including the Carrington storm

Protons penetrating Earth’s Atmosphere 1 Me. V proton 100 Thermosphere Altitude (km) 80 60

Protons penetrating Earth’s Atmosphere 1 Me. V proton 100 Thermosphere Altitude (km) 80 60 40 20 Mesopause 10 Me. V proton Mesosphere Middle Atmosphere NE O OZ Stratopause 100 Me. V proton Stratosphere Troposphere 1 Ge. V proton Tropopause 0 100 Me. V protons penetrate to the stratosphere and can destroy ozone. Ge. V particles can affect airplane crew/passengers in polar routes Courtesy: C. Jackman