Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA DVCS and Vector

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
Exclusive (hard) diffraction at HERA (DVCS and Vector Mesons) P. Marage Université Libre de

Exclusive (hard) diffraction at HERA (DVCS and Vector Mesons) P. Marage Université Libre de Bruxelles 1

The HERA harvest initial state : real and virtual photons final state VM :

The HERA harvest initial state : real and virtual photons final state VM : g, r, f, J/y, y(2 s), U final state baryonic syst. : p, p. diss. MV 0 – 10 Ge. V Q 2 0 – 80 Ge. V 2 W ≈ √(Q 2/x) 30 – 300 Ge. V |t| = |pt, miss|2 0 – 30 Ge. V 2 photoproduction & DIS small (< 0. 5 – 3 Ge. V 2) & large |t| (2 < |t| < 10 -30 Ge. V 2) > 30 H 1 + ZEUS published exp. papers most recent results (2008 -2009) - DVCS ZEUS (LPS) + H 1 - r photoprod. H 1 - r and f electroprod. H 1 - U photoprod. ZEUS - real g at large |t| H 1 P. Marage DESY-08 -132 + H 1 -prelim-09 -014 H 1 -prelim-09 -016 DESY-09 -093 (to appear soon) DESY-09 -036 DESY-08 -077 Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 2

Context QCD frameworks collinear factorisation (GPD) proton rest frame factorisation (dipole approach) scale -

Context QCD frameworks collinear factorisation (GPD) proton rest frame factorisation (dipole approach) scale - long. amplitudes - transv. amplitudes Content DVCS ds / d. Q 2, d. W, dt (small t) VM helicity amplitudes elast. / proton diss. ; Regge factorisation ds / d. W, dt (large t); helicity amplitudes P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 3

Event selection and backgrounds Photoprod. (Q 2 ~ 0) / electroprod. (Q 2 >

Event selection and backgrounds Photoprod. (Q 2 ~ 0) / electroprod. (Q 2 > 1 Ge. V 2) : absence / presence of electron cand. VM selection : 2 tracks + inv. mass selection elastic events : LPS (ZEUS) or no tag in forward detectors (H 1, Zeus) proton dissociation : tag events, |t| <3 Ge. V 2 |t| < 0. 5 Ge. V 2 backgrounds: elastic <-> p. diss. events other VM’s (r’) continuum r U P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 4

DVCS P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 –

DVCS P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 5

Q 2 dependence LPS GPD and dipole models GPD take into account skewing but

Q 2 dependence LPS GPD and dipole models GPD take into account skewing but kin. skewing is not sufficient P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 6

Re / Im (BCA) interference with Bethe-Heitler → access to Re contributions Beam charge

Re / Im (BCA) interference with Bethe-Heitler → access to Re contributions Beam charge asymmetry (e+ vs. e-) in agreement with dispersion relation analysis W, t dependences; effective Regge trajectory : see below P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 7

2 Q P. Marage dependences (VM) Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM)

2 Q P. Marage dependences (VM) Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 8

r and f (el. and p. diss. ) Excellent ZEUS-H 1 agreement on total

r and f (el. and p. diss. ) Excellent ZEUS-H 1 agreement on total cross sections (also for f with ZEUS p. diss. bg. subtraction as for r) P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 9

r and f – polarised cross sections NB fixed W, varying x P. Marage

r and f – polarised cross sections NB fixed W, varying x P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 10

(approximate) universality Cross sections scaled by quark charge content Very strong Q 2 dependence

(approximate) universality Cross sections scaled by quark charge content Very strong Q 2 dependence approximate universality as a function of Q 2+M 2 P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 11

W dependences P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09

W dependences P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 12

Photoproduction : mass dependence soft stot r, w, f hard J/Y U (skewing, Re

Photoproduction : mass dependence soft stot r, w, f hard J/Y U (skewing, Re GPD) P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 13

DVCS and electroprod. : Q 2 dependence DVCS J/y r see below – effective

DVCS and electroprod. : Q 2 dependence DVCS J/y r see below – effective Regge trajectory P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 14

t dependences P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09

t dependences P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 15

t dependences elast. DVCS (LPS) p. diss. r f DVCS (p. diss. ) P.

t dependences elast. DVCS (LPS) p. diss. r f DVCS (p. diss. ) P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 16

b slopes elastic p. dissoc. optical model - b decrease with dipole size (Q

b slopes elastic p. dissoc. optical model - b decrease with dipole size (Q 2, mq) - universal scale dependence for m 2 > 5 Ge. V 2 m 2 = (Q 2 + M 2)/4 for VM m 2 = Q 2 for DVCS - b(r, f at large Q 2) -> b (J/y) -> small room for VM form factor b. VM P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 17

bel – bpd and Regge factorisation Vertex (“Regge”) factorisation Ø Ø bel. – bp.

bel – bpd and Regge factorisation Vertex (“Regge”) factorisation Ø Ø bel. – bp. diss. ~ cte (? ) ~ 5. 5 for r, f = 4 for DVCS (m 2 = Q 2) = 3. 5 for J/y -> factorisation for m 2 > 5 Ge. V 2 ? P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 18

Effective Regge trajectory P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’

Effective Regge trajectory P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 19

Effective trajectory ü W dependence s~Wd ü d = 4 (a(t) – 1) a(t)

Effective trajectory ü W dependence s~Wd ü d = 4 (a(t) – 1) a(t) = a(0) + a’ t shrinkage of diffractive peak W – t correlation t dependence as a function of W P. Marage W dependence as a function of t Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 20

Shrinkage Xx Put rho photoprod. r electroprod. P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA

Shrinkage Xx Put rho photoprod. r electroprod. P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 21

a’ slope hadron-hadron inter. : a‘ = 0. 25 Ge. V-2 H 1 DVCS

a’ slope hadron-hadron inter. : a‘ = 0. 25 Ge. V-2 H 1 DVCS : a‘ = 0. 03 ± 0. 09 ± 0. 11 Ge. V-2 NB J/y 2 < |t| < 30 Ge. V 2 photoprod. , a‘ = - 0. 02 ± 0. 01 Ge. V-2 (H 1 + ZEUS) P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 22

a. P(0) m 2 = (Q 2 + M 2)/4 for VM m 2

a. P(0) m 2 = (Q 2 + M 2)/4 for VM m 2 = Q 2 for DVCS hardening with Q 2 and mass (dipole size) light VM : getting similar to J/y for m 2 larger than about 5 Ge. V 2 P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 23

Remark on scales P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’

Remark on scales P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 24

Helicity amplitudes P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09

Helicity amplitudes P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 25

spin density matrix elements 3 angles describe VM production and decay → 15 spin

spin density matrix elements 3 angles describe VM production and decay → 15 spin density matrix elements bilinear combinations of helicity amplitudes Tlr, lg (NPE is assumed) SCHC T 00 T 11 single flip T 01 T 10 double flip T-1 1 P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 26

spin density matrix elements (Q 2) (r) 5 SCHC elements compared to GPD calculations

spin density matrix elements (Q 2) (r) 5 SCHC elements compared to GPD calculations Other elements (dashed lines) compatible with 0 or small) except ~ T 01 T 00* several models (GPD, unintegrated kt, dipole + saturation) can reproduce general features of SCHC amplitudes + hierarchy but not details P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 27

R(Q 2) ; Q 2 / M 2 p. QCD : formally R ~

R(Q 2) ; Q 2 / M 2 p. QCD : formally R ~ Q 2 / M 2 scaling plot (Q 2 / M 2 V) - scaling OK - lower than 1 - damping at large Q 2 P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 28

R(W) No W dependence of s. L / s. T P. Marage Exclusive hard

R(W) No W dependence of s. L / s. T P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 29

R (t) ; b. L - b. T Q 2 > 5 Ge. V

R (t) ; b. L - b. T Q 2 > 5 Ge. V 2 H 1 Q 2 > 5 Ge. V 2 : b. L - b. T <0 1. 5 s (stat. + syst. ) also t dependence of T 11 / T 00 – see below indication that transverse size of dipoles from transverse photons is larger than from longitudinal photons P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 30

R (m) (r) Decrease of R(m) is qualitatively consistent with formal p. QCD calculations

R (m) (r) Decrease of R(m) is qualitatively consistent with formal p. QCD calculations R ~ Q 2 / M 2 if M is diquark / dipion mass rather than resonance mass Support to models (MRT) with small relevance of the VM WF P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 31

amplitudes ratios (t, Q 2) (r) Global fit of 15 SDME -> 4 amplitude

amplitudes ratios (t, Q 2) (r) Global fit of 15 SDME -> 4 amplitude ratios (supposed to be purely imaginary) Q 2 < 5 Q 2 > 5 (Ivanov-Kirschner) ü Q 2 dependences (higher twist) of all amplitude ratios ü t dependences of helicity flip amplitudes T 01/T 00 NB double flip amplitude -> gluon polarisation Ø t dependence of T 11 / T 00 - cf. R(t) : different slopes for L and T – here 3 s effect P. Marage T 10/T 00 Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) T-11/T 00 EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 32

SCHC amplitudes phases (Q 2) (r, f) phase between T 00 and T 11

SCHC amplitudes phases (Q 2) (r, f) phase between T 00 and T 11 ≠ 0 phase difference decreases with Q 2 NB phase difference related to different values of r = Re / Im, which are related through dispersion relations to the W evolutions -> indication of different W evolution of transverse and longitudinal ampltudes ? P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 33

Large |t| P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09

Large |t| P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 34

t dependences Power like t dependences for real g, r, J/Y Quote measured powers

t dependences Power like t dependences for real g, r, J/Y Quote measured powers for photon, rho, jpsi J/Y BFKL running as excluded DGLAP OK (t < MY 2) see also helicity below P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) r r BFKL favoured EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 35

W dependences rise of s with W described by BFKL, not by DGLAP at

W dependences rise of s with W described by BFKL, not by DGLAP at large |t| J/Y BFKL pred. P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) g EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 36

SDME (r) “naïve” p. QCD predicts large helicity flip, with long. r dominating at

SDME (r) “naïve” p. QCD predicts large helicity flip, with long. r dominating at large |t| (spin flip ~ t) But SCHC T → T dominates + double flip T → T Reason : chiral odd contribution in g (due to constituent quark mass) → no orbital momentum needed for YT → SCHC BFKL model describes data, except for sign of cf. also t and W dependences P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 37

SDME (J/y) SDME compatible with SCHC, as expected from models and compact J/y WF

SDME (J/y) SDME compatible with SCHC, as expected from models and compact J/y WF P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 38

Summary and conclusions P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’

Summary and conclusions P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 39

summary Measurements of kinematic and angular distributions of real g, r and f, J/y,

summary Measurements of kinematic and angular distributions of real g, r and f, J/y, in photo- and electroprod. , small and large |t| Ø DVCS Q 2, W, t dependences; beam charge asymmetry -> Re/Im amplitudes Ø VM at small |t| Q 2, W, t dependences of DVCS, r and f, J/y hard features for Q 2 + M 2 ³ 10 -20 Ge. V 2 helicity amplitudes SCHC + helicity violations Q 2 and t dependences understood in QCD indication of b. L – b. T ¹ 0 cos(d) ¹ 1 effective Regge trajectory apom(0) increases with scale. a‘ < 0. 25 Ge. V-2 GPD and dipole models describe main features, but differences in details Ø VM at large |t| W, t dependences; helicity amplitudes BFKL describes main features, but differences in details P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 40

conclusions Very rich and varied landscape, explored by ZEUS and H 1, complementing lower

conclusions Very rich and varied landscape, explored by ZEUS and H 1, complementing lower energy experiments A semi-quantitative understanding is achieved in a QCD framework, in the two complementary approaches of GPD’s and dipole models and, at large |t|, in the BFKL framework Many thanks to the organisers, and to all those to whom I borrowed data – plots – ideas P. Marage Exclusive hard diffraction at HERA (DVCS and VM) EDS’ 09 – CERN 29/06 -03/07/2009 41