EVLA Front Ends 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
EVLA Front Ends 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 1

EVLA Front Ends 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 1

 • 1 – 50 GHz Coverage • In 8 Bands • Dual Circular

• 1 – 50 GHz Coverage • In 8 Bands • Dual Circular Polarization 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 2

OMTs Quad-ridge Bøifot Symmetric Junction 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 3

OMTs Quad-ridge Bøifot Symmetric Junction 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 3

Bands 1 – 2, 2 – 4, 4 – 8 Quad-Ridge OMT & 90º

Bands 1 – 2, 2 – 4, 4 – 8 Quad-Ridge OMT & 90º Hybrid Design Scaled for frequency Commercial Stripline Hybrids 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 4

Bands 12 – 18, 18 – 26, 26 – 40 Corrugated Phase Shifter Bøifot

Bands 12 – 18, 18 – 26, 26 – 40 Corrugated Phase Shifter Bøifot OMT 18 – 26 GHz in Production Now. 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 5

Band 8 – 12 Quad-ridge or Bøifot; depends on size. Band 45 – 50

Band 8 – 12 Quad-ridge or Bøifot; depends on size. Band 45 – 50 Sloping Septum, in Production Now. 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 6

Cost per Receiver 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 7

Cost per Receiver 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 7

Advice Sought: Octave Bandwidth Quad-Ridge OMT “Headroom” MMICS 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory

Advice Sought: Octave Bandwidth Quad-Ridge OMT “Headroom” MMICS 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 8

Quad-Ridge OMT Critical Areas Octave Bandwidth 2: 1 at ~20 d. B has been

Quad-Ridge OMT Critical Areas Octave Bandwidth 2: 1 at ~20 d. B has been done. Higher Modes Above cutoff: affect beam Below cutoff: “suckouts” TE 21 L most troublesome 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 9

Quad-Ridge OMT Design Approach: Circular-to-Quad-Ridge Waveguide: treat as impedance transformer Quad-Ridge to Coax: design

Quad-Ridge OMT Design Approach: Circular-to-Quad-Ridge Waveguide: treat as impedance transformer Quad-Ridge to Coax: design for match 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 10

Q-R OMT Modes Trapped Modes Q ~1000 Coupling fairly weak, ~ -25 d. B

Q-R OMT Modes Trapped Modes Q ~1000 Coupling fairly weak, ~ -25 d. B Effect on beam? “one-pass” loss ~ 0. 014 d. B 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 11

Shorting Pins at /4 Short out TE 11 modes Pass TE 21 L mode

Shorting Pins at /4 Short out TE 11 modes Pass TE 21 L mode to absorber Assures one-pass for TE 21 L 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 12

Headroom What is it? How Defined? (TOIP? 1 d. B? 1%? ) How Measured?

Headroom What is it? How Defined? (TOIP? 1 d. B? 1%? ) How Measured? How Much Do We Need? “As much as we can get, or. . . ” 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 13

Headroom Against What? Narrow-Band Pulsed Noise-like Component Variations 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory

Headroom Against What? Narrow-Band Pulsed Noise-like Component Variations 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 14

How Much Can We Afford? Dollars Tsys Size and Power Dissipation 10 June 2002

How Much Can We Afford? Dollars Tsys Size and Power Dissipation 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie Advisory Committee 15

MMIC Solution for a High Dynamic Range “Solar” Capable Receiver Ka-Band HNA Step Att

MMIC Solution for a High Dynamic Range “Solar” Capable Receiver Ka-Band HNA Step Att 25 -41 GHz 15 d. B Po=+10 d. Bm (? ) NF < 5 d. B SPDT Switch MMIC’s Level 10 (? ) 25 d. B Post-Amp 35 d. B x 3 LNA MMIC’s 36 -50 GHz 26 -40 GHz Pol Step Att PIN Switch LO Ref 12 -16. 7 GHz Noise Diode IF Out 8 -18 GHz MMIC’s 36 -50 GHz x 3 LNA 35 d. B Post-Amp MMIC’s Step Att SPDT Switch 25 d. B NF < 5 d. B 15 d. B HNA 10 June 2002 Paul Lilie MMIC’s Advisory Committee 25 -41 GHz Po=+10 d. Bm (? ) Level 10 (? ) 16