Evaluation and Presentation of Information tzchiutmu edu tw

資訊的評選與呈現 小論文之選材與格式 Evaluation and Presentation of Information 邱子恆 tzchiu@tmu. edu. tw 臺北醫學大學通識教育中心 2011. 05. 02

Find Evidence-Base resources in Medline We are Here Because of You!

Advanced Ovid Search We are Here Because of You! 33

在Medline找到實證文獻 1. Systematic Review in Ovid Medline 2. 臨床問題取向：Clinical Queries 3. 依實證等級依次篩選EBM文獻 – Additional Limits： Subject Subsets：Systematic reviews 1. Publication Type • 1. 利用Me. SH標題詞指定 2. 指定特定文獻出處 We are Here Because of You! 36

2. Systematic Review in Ovid Medline • 包含以下類型文獻 – – – • systematic reviews meta-analyses reviews of clinical trials evidence-based medicine consensus development conferences Guidelines 使用方式： – Additional Limits Subject Subsets Systematic Reviews 詳細檢索策略請參考： • http: //www. nlm. nih. gov/bsd/pubmed_subsets/sysreviews _strategy. html We are Here Because of You! 40

選擇Systematic reviews We are Here Because of You! 41

臨床問題取向：Clinical Queries We are Here Because of You! 45

Ovid Medline EBM 文獻 查詢順位 1. Systematic Review Cochrane System Review Health Technology Assessments ACP Journal club Meta-Analysis Consensus Development Reports Decision Analyses Guideline/Practice Guideline – – – – ----Clinical Queries---- -- • RCTs Double Blind studies (therapy, diagnosis) – • Controlled Clinical Trials – 1. Multicenter Studies Crossover Design We are Here Because of You! 4. Cohorts Studies (prognosis, etiology, prevention) – Longitudinal Studies • • Follow-Up Studies Prospective Studies 5. Case Control Studies (prognosis, etiology, prevention) – Retrospective Studies • • • Cross-Sectional Survey Review Case Series/Case Reports • 使用Limits/Additional Limits篩選，例如 RCTs • 研究方法可使用Map Term to Subject 47 Heading查詢，如Cohorts Studies

使用 Limits/Additional Limits篩 選 選擇適合文獻類型： RCT, Case Report…… We are Here Because of You! 48

滾出EBM大雪球 We are Here Because of You! 49

評鑑網站的標準 n Content and Organization 1. Unique, original content 2. Up-to-date content 3. Well-organized content 4. Are graphics content?

評鑑網站的標準 n Presentation and Usability 1. Easy to learn 2. Efficient to use 3. Easy to remember 4. Few errors 5. Pleasant to use

Grassian和Zwemer提出六項準則供UCLA 的學生來判斷從網路上搜尋到的資訊 1. 權威性(authority)和正確性(accuracy) 2. 訴求(advocacy) 和客觀性(objectivity) 3. 新穎性(currency)和範圍(coverage)

Q&A?