Evaluating Handheld GPS Receivers for Recording Archaeological Survey

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Evaluating Handheld GPS Receivers for Recording Archaeological Survey Data GEO 444 – Practical GPS

Evaluating Handheld GPS Receivers for Recording Archaeological Survey Data GEO 444 – Practical GPS William Eichmann and Jake Reidel

Archaeological Survey Data Survey areas: agricultural field boundaries, areas surveyed, surface conditions, transect interval,

Archaeological Survey Data Survey areas: agricultural field boundaries, areas surveyed, surface conditions, transect interval, often visible on satellite images, polygons, certainty=10 m. Individual artifacts: “isolated finds” reflect diffuse activities across landscape, diagnostic artifacts, points, certainty=2 -5 m. Sites: concentrated areas of material culture, amorphous and fuzzy boundaries, comprised of individual artifacts, polygons, certainty=10 m.

Time and Cost How much time does the method take relative to other methods?

Time and Cost How much time does the method take relative to other methods? How does it compare with other methods in terms of accuracy?

Field Site: UW Aboretum

Field Site: UW Aboretum

Google Earth

Google Earth

Methods Vehicle 2 recievers Garmin Etrex and Vista Digital camera computer Software: GPS Babel,

Methods Vehicle 2 recievers Garmin Etrex and Vista Digital camera computer Software: GPS Babel, Google Earth pro. Date of fieldwork: 2008. 05 Time of fieldwork: 16: 47 -18: 50 Waypoints: measured for 1 min. Tracks measurement frequency: 5 sec. (p 14), 30 sec (p 12)

Data Analysis

Data Analysis

Field conditions

Field conditions

Waypoints

Waypoints

Results: Waypoints / Routes

Results: Waypoints / Routes

Masking

Masking

Tracks

Tracks

Visual Comparison

Visual Comparison

Discussion Both waypoints/routes and tracks are sufficiently accurate and precise for defining field and

Discussion Both waypoints/routes and tracks are sufficiently accurate and precise for defining field and site boundaries. Tracks take less time and provide better accuracy with similar precision to waypoints/routes Tracks may be better suited to recording amorphous shapes of sites Record individual artifacts as waypoints. Tall vegetation masks satellites

Conclusion and Improvements Survey areas: collect several control points and define fields based on

Conclusion and Improvements Survey areas: collect several control points and define fields based on satellite images. Individual artifacts: record as waypoints Sites: record with tracks Equipment: use a GPS receiver/data collector with loaded background images.