EUROPEAN COMMISSION European GNSS Programmes EGNOS and Galileo

EUROPEAN COMMISSION European GNSS Programmes EGNOS and Galileo Paul Verhoef Programme Manager EU satellite navigation programmes European Commission

Presentation content 1. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA

Presentation content 1. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA

EGNOS: GPS augmentation service EGNOS Service Area EGNOS Satellite Footprints INMARSAT AOR-E (15. 5°W), ARTEMIS (21. 3°E), INMARSAT IOR-W (25°E) | 4

EGNOS Programme Phases EGNOS Timeline Regional Infrastructure & Services Operational Phase (Long Term Operations, Extensions, Replenishments) Deployment Phase Definition Phase 2002 2003 2004 2005 IOP … Initial Operations 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 | 2019 5

EGNOS Performance (January 2009) Source: Service Management Report ESSP for January 2009 The deployment of additional RIMS in Northern Europe, Southern Europe, and Northern Africa will increase the coverage area of APV-1 Availability. APV … Approach with vertical guidance | 6

EGNOS Performance (March 2007 – August 2008) Accumulative Signal in Space (SIS) Availability 100, 00% 90, 00% % SIS of last 28 days 80, 00% 70, 00% 60, 00% 50, 00% 40, 00% 30, 00% 26/08/2008 05/08/2008 15/07/2008 24/06/2008 03/06/2008 13/05/2008 22/04/2008 01/04/2008 11/03/2008 19/02/2008 29/01/2008 08/01/2008 18/12/2007 27/11/2007 06/11/2007 16/10/2007 25/09/2007 04/09/2007 14/08/2007 24/07/2007 03/07/2007 12/06/2007 22/05/2007 01/05/2007 0, 00% 10/04/2007 10, 00% 20/03/2007 Date EGNOS is already broadcasting signals of excellent quality. Signal in Space availability has been continuous since January 2008*. * with exception of 28 December 2008 | 7

EGNOS Programme Status . . EGNOS is already broadcasting signals of excellent quality 2009: » » Assets have been transferred from ESA to the European Community in April 2009 First EGNOS operator contract as of 1 st April 2009 New OS ICD release planned for autumn 2009 Lease completed of an EGNOS transponder to replace ARTEMIS as of 2011 Procurement action ongoing for replacement of a 2 nd EGNOS transponder Geographical service extension is under study 2010: » SOL declaration of "entry into service" planned for mid-2010 (after certification milestone) | 8

EGNOS potential extensions Eastern Europe Middle-East MEDA Depending on the extension area, technical implementation may vary from: • Homogeneous extension with deployment of additional RIMS • Regional infrastructure including additional processing capabilities | 9

EGNOS Service Evolutions . . . Service Provision Improvements ►short/medium term Coverage Evolution » » Eastern Europe, MEDA, Middle East/ACAC Africa ►medium/long term ►medium term Frequency Evolution » Extension to the E 5 a/E 5 b frequency decided on ARTEMIS replacement Evolution of Standards ►long term » » Standardisation of E 5 a and E 5 b, L 1 CBOC on-going Augmentation of new GNSS Additional Services » » » LPV 200 service level ►medium term (2011) EGNOS capability to meet this service level currently under technical evaluation EGNOS time service ►medium term Possible critical communication message | 10

EGNOS Value Added EGNOS appls EGNOS Performance Value Add EGNOS Value Added (versus & GPS) Accuracy Markets Integrity Availability Continuity E 112 n/a Non Reg LBS n/a 1. Size of circles indicates importance of each attribute of EGNOS to the market, (large = very important) LBS e. Call Road Truck Telematics Pay as you drive Freight multimodality Dangerous goods perishables Specialist tracking HGV - Livestock City Logistics n/a n/a n/a 3. Integrity may be useful to Road applications, primarily RUC, but there little awareness of the value or potential role or need for it. APV Aviation Rail Other professional Farming Inland waterways A-SMGCS (Aircraft Gnd Vehicles) n/a Shunting n/a High Precision n/a agriculture (OS) 2. The extent to which EGNOS meets these attributes is identified by the colour: green … meets requirements red … does not meet Precision agriculture (HPP) n/a Traffic management & surveillance n/a 4. Precision agriculture in OS includes crop spraying, yield management and field / plot measurement | 11

Presentation content 1. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA

Galileo Timeline Global Infrastructure & Services Galileo Programme Phases Exploitation Phase Deployment Phase Development / IOV Phase Definition Phase 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 | 13

Galileo Implementation Full Operational Capability Plan 27 (+3) Galileo satellites 2013 In-Orbit Validation 4 IOV satellites plus ground segment 2010 Galileo System Testbed v 2 2 initial test satellites 2005 Galileo System Testbed v 1 Validation of critical algorithms 2003 | 14

Galileo Test Satellites . . Giove-A launched on 28 December 2005 » Secured Galileo frequencies Giove-B launched on 27 April 2008 » » » First Passive Hydrogen Maser atomic clock ever flown Implementation of CBOC signal Working as expected | 15

Galileo IOV vs FOC Component IOV Phase FOC Phase Satellites 4 27(+3) Control Centres 1 3 Mission Uplink Stations 5 9 TT&C Stations 2 5 Sensor Stations 20 30 -40 IOV (In Orbit Validation), FOC (Full Operational Capability) | 16

IOV Ground Segment Sites Svalbard ULS/GSS Alaska GSS Kiruna TTC Redu GSS Urumchi GSS Fucino GSS Washington GSS S. Korea GSS Riyadh GSS Hawaii GSS Kourou TTC/ULS/GSS New Caledonia ULS/GSS Reunion ULS/GSS Papeete ULS/GSS Easter Island GSS Cordoba GSS South Africa GSS Troll GSS Perth GSS Sensor Stations Up-Link stations TT&C stations Control Centres | 17

Galileo FOC Procurement . . . Contract notice: 1 July 2008 Infrastructure procurement in 6 work packages Operational Capability in 2013 | 18

Galileo Procurement Retained Candidates Work Package 1. System Support 2. Ground Mission Segment 3. Ground Control Segment 4. Space Segment 5. Launch Services 6. Operations . . . Retained Candidates Thales. Alenia. Space (IT) Logica (NL) Thales. Alenia. Space (FR) Logica (UK) Astrium (UK) G-Nav grouping represented by Lockheed Martin IS&S (UK) Astrium (DE) OHB System (DE ) Arianespace (FR) Nav-up grouping represented by Inmarsat (UK) DLR (DE) and Telespazio (IT) | 19

Updated Governance | 20

Presentation content 1. EGNOS 2. Galileo 3. EU-USA

EU-USA . Common approach with regard to an overall GNSS strategy » » » Solving the compatibility issues and enhancing interoperability Developing a common GNSS standard for Safety of Life Coordinating inputs to UN ICG/Providers’ Forum | 22

EU-USA . . Galileo and GPS are compatible and interoperable » Thanks to detailed and lengthy bilateral discussions through Working Groups, established by the EU US 2004 Agreement and following close monitoring by the senior levels chaired by US Do. S and EC » Excellent results to-date • MBOC common modulation • National Security Compatibility Compliance • GGTO implemented on IOV and tested on GIOVE But, many more joint efforts are needed to ensure C&I for all GNSS | 23

GNSS Compatibility & Interoperability E 5 a E 5 b E 6 L 1 L 5 L 3 L 5 E 5 b LEX (E 6) L 1 E 6 L 1 COMPASS IRNSS | 24

EU-USA . Other issues » Trade working-group » Security • Further definition of « non-discriminatory approach to trade in GNSS goods and services (WTO) • Discussion on IPR aspects of Galileo R&D • Galileo spectrum in U. S. National Table of Frequency Allocations • Joint outreach (GPS-Galileo fact sheet etc) • Procurement of GPS and Galileo • Sofar: Export controls, technology control • Next: Endorsement of new legal basis for exchange of classified information • Protection/hosting of ground stations • Security roles and responsibilities | 25

EU-USA . Safety of Life Service: common GNSS standard » 1 st generation SBAS (WAAS EGNOS MSAS GAGAN) has reached a good level of maturity, but are based on GPS only » Galileo has designed a So. L standard » Integrity concepts likely to evolve with increasing number of constellations » Other constellations are interested in developing built-in integrity » Users need a single interface, single standard » Need common vision for the future | 26

Thank you for your attention. SOURCE | 27