Ethical Reasoning Moral Decision Making La Coya Crape

Ethical Reasoning & Moral Decision Making La. Coya Crape Siena Heights University LDR: 604 -OB: Ethics & Social Justice November 26, 2018

This power point goes along with the “Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making” paper. It will serve as a summary; however, it will include a full detailed list of the Steps to Ethical Decision Making. Whereas the paper did not provide a complete list. Ethical Reasoning & Moral Decision Making TREY research 2

Define What Do They Mean? What Do They Stand For? Ethical Reasoning Developing ethical reasoning means designing learning strategies that helps one remember to think about right and wrong human conduct. It is not just about following moral rules but rather developing the ability to think about situations, Moral Decision Making A person’s ethics, manners, character and their beliefs make up what they believe is a moral decision and these decisions tend to affect one’s well being as well as the well-being of others. evaluate the issues and determine through reason what actions may be right or wrong. TREY research 3

Why Are they Important? Ø It helps us determine and differentiate between right thinking, decisions, and actions and those that are wrong, hurtful or harmful, to ourselves or others ( Weiss, 2014). Ø To keep things running smoothly and fairly. Ø To gain trust of others. Ø To avoid penalties and /or Financial issues. Add a footer TREY research 4

Moral Responsibility Criteria Since a major aim of ethical reasoning is to gain a clear focus on issues to facilitate in morally responsible ways. One is morally responsible for their actions if they cause harm when they: ü Knowingly and freely acted or caused the act to happen and knew that it was morally wrong or hurtful to others. ü They knowingly and freely failed to prevent the act, and they knew it would be wrong for this person to do this (Weiss, 2014). TREY research 5

Steps to Ethical Decision Making 1. GATHER THE FACTS -Don’t jump to conclusions without the facts -Questions to ask: Who, what, where, when, how, and why -However, facts may be difficult to find because of the uncertainty often found around ethical issues -Some facts are not available -Assemble as many facts as possible before proceeding -Clarify what assumptions you are making 2. DEFINE THE ETHICAL ISSUE(S) -Don’t jump to solutions without first identifying the ethical issue(s) in the situation. -Define the ethical basis for the issue you want to focus on -There may be multiple ethical issues – focus on one major one at a time Add a footer TREY research 6

Continued…. 3. IDENTIFY THE AFFECTED PARTIES -Identify all of the stakeholders -Who are the primary or direct stakeholders? -Who are the secondary or indirect stakeholders? -Why are they stakeholders for the issue? -Perspective-taking - Try to see things through the eyes of those individuals affected 4. IDENTIFY THE CONSEQUENCES -Think about potential positive and negative consequences for affected parties by the decision (Focus on primary stakeholders to simplify analysis until you become comfortable with the process). -What are the magnitude of the consequences and the probability that the consequences will happen. -Short term vs. Long term consequences – will decision be valid over time. -Broader systemic consequences – tied to symbolic and secrecy -Symbolic consequences – Each decision sends a message. -Secrecy consequences – What are the consequences if the decision or action becomes public? -Did you consider relevant cognitive barriers/biases? -Consider what your decision would be based only on consequences then move on and see if it is similar given other considerations. Add a footer TREY research 7

Continued…. 5. IDENTIFY THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES, RIGHTS, AND JUSTICE ISSUES Obligations should be thought of in terms of principles and rights involved A) What obligations are created because of particular ethical principles you might use in the situation? Examples: Do no harm; Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; Do what you would have anyone in your shoes do in the given context. B) What obligations are created because of the specific rights of the stakeholders? -What rights are more basic vs. secondary in nature? Which help protect an individual’s basic autonomy? �What types of rights are involved – negative or positive? C) What concepts of justice (fairness) are relevant – distributive or procedural justice? -Did you consider any relevant cognitive barriers/biases? -Formulate the appropriate decision or action based solely on the above analysis of these obligations. Add a footer TREY research 8

Continued…. 6. CONSIDER YOUR CHARACTER & INTEGRITY -Consider what your relevant community members would consider to be the kind of decision that an individual of integrity would make in this situation. -What specific virtues are relevant in the situation? -Disclosure rule – what would you do if the New York Times reported your action and everyone was to read it. -Think about how your decision will be remembered when you are gone. -Did you consider any relevant cognitive biases/barriers? -What decision would you come to based solely on character considerations? 7. THINK CREATIVELY ABOUT POTENTIAL ACTIONS -Be sure you have not been unnecessarily forced into a corner -You may have some choices or alternatives that have not been considered -If you have come up with solutions “a” and “b, ” try to brainstorm and come up with a “c” solution that might satisfy the interests of the primary parties involved in the situation TREY research 9

Continued…. 8. CHECK YOUR GUT -Even though the prior steps have argued for a highly rational process, it is always good to “check your gut. ” -Intuition is gaining credibility as a source for good decision making – knowing something is not “right. ” • Particularly relevant if you have a lot of experience in the area – expert decision-making. 9. DECIDE ON YOUR COURSE OF ACTION AND PREPARE RESPONSES TO THOSE WHO MAY OPPOSE YOUR POSITION -Consider potential actions based on the consequences, obligations, and character approaches. -Do you come up with similar answers from the different perspectives? -Do the obligation and character help you “check” the consequentialist preferred action? -How can you protect the rights of those involved (or your own character) while still maximizing the overall good for all of the stakeholders? -What arguments are most compelling to you to justify the action ethically? How will you respond to those with opposing viewpoints? TREY research 10

Thank You La. Coya Crape 269 -841 -3522 lacoyacrape@yahoo. com Mysiena. edu TREY research 11