ESP Geomagnetic Activity and the Brain Low Geomagnetic
ESP, Geomagnetic Activity and the Brain
Low Geomagnetic Activity = Successful ESP? Spottiswoode (1997): N = 2, 879 rs = -0. 03 p = 0. 06 1 -tailed
Studies Included Edinburgh Ganzfeld Studies Condition N es Sender - No Sender (Morris et al. ) Sender 64 0. 17 Creativity (Dalton) All 75 0. 52 Drumming (Symmons & Morris) 7 Hz 25 0. 54 Creativity (Morris et al. ) All 40 0. 19 Northampton Ganzfeld Studies Condition N es REG/Human Receiver (Roe et al. ) Human 0. 28 York Remote Viewing Condition N es Precognitive Remote Viewing All 0. 42 40 99
Band 5 Band 4 Method Band 3 Band 2 Band 1
Band 3
Band 1 rs =0. 28, p= 0. 0059, 2 -tailed After correction for multiple analyses: p =0. 025, 2 -tailed
Band 1 Pulsation Band 3 Pulsation
Thermal Noise Threshold = 0. 02 V/m Geomagnetic Disturbance Electric Field Large Disturbance (200 n. T) 1 n. V/m Medium Pulsation (2 n. T) 0. 03 n. V/m Small Pulsation (0. 2 n. T) 0. 02 n. V/m Schumann Resonance (1 p. T) 0. 003 n. V/m
Radical Pair
Free Radicals
Radical Pair
Radical Pair
Radical Pair
Radical Pair
Sunrise Midday
Sunrise Midday
This is a Big Effect Spottiswoode (1997): ESP effect size (mean) = 0. 14 ESP effect size (optimum) = 0. 71 Ryan (2008): ESP effect size (mean) = 0. 37 ESP effect size (optimum) = 0. 75
Sun Spot Number Prediction Roney-Dougal, Luke & Ryan Subbotsky & Ryan Year
- Slides: 37
