ESH Status of Construction and Technical System Installations

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator June

ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 1 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Subcontracted Work Goals GC managed Injury rate concern Project responsibility 90 days of field

Subcontracted Work Goals GC managed Injury rate concern Project responsibility 90 days of field work remaining The goal is Zero future incidents CF & Technical Systems Installation Maintaining exemplary safety record Direct subcontractor management Detailed work planning June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 2 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Project-specific ISEMS Implementation LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan LCLS Work Authorization Procedure LCLS

Project-specific ISEMS Implementation LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan LCLS Work Authorization Procedure LCLS Project ES&H Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings PM/UTR manages each subcontract Leads to success TCCO Project Health and Safety Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Pre-Task Planning Meeting Pre-Task Checklist Superintendents assigned geographically June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 3 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through April 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1. 8 M

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through April 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1. 8 M Hours worked Sub. Contractors 484 K Hours worked DART Rate 3. 7 (9 Incidents) TRC Rate 4. 6 (2 Incidents) LCLS Collaboration 1, 300 K Hours worked DART Rate 0. 3 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort. DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0. 25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0. 65 per 100 FTEs. June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 4 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Safety (Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration) June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 5 scharf@slac. stanford.

Project Safety (Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration) June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 5 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Incident Distribution June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 6 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Incident Distribution June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 6 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Stewardship October ’ 06 thru April ’ 07 Ramp Up to Full Production

TCCo Stewardship October ’ 06 thru April ’ 07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate Check/correction of existing documentation PMT changes Deficiency Notices May ’ 07 thru November ’ 07 Full Production : Injuries Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan Procedural violations transition to injures Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors PE changes Deficiency Notices & Fines Communication with Corporate TCCo Safety Stewardship Committee Established Full time on-site medic (+30 hr OSHA) UTRs added – focus on safety June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 7 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Stewardship cont’d December ’ 07 thru April ’ 08 : Injuries continue Two

TCCo Stewardship cont’d December ’ 07 thru April ’ 08 : Injuries continue Two incident associated with one sub PM removed Work stopped 90 Days (to the end of field work) Focus on effective work planning & execution sought Plan for joint observation developed Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings JSA review with workers throughout the day Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices Must communicate with the worker The goal is Zero! June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 8 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

CF & Technical Systems Stewardship Excellent Safety Record 100 K+ hours w/o injury S

CF & Technical Systems Stewardship Excellent Safety Record 100 K+ hours w/o injury S 20, MMF, Injector, BC 1 & 2 Issues addressed immediately Positive Results Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers Direct management of subcontractors Communicate ES&H Expectations Guide them to success Enforcement when needed Thorough Work Planning and Control Aggressive ISM management Ownership of safety a condition of employment The goal is to maintain Zero! June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 9 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Conclusion Past TCCo safety performance is not acceptable LCLS providing more prescriptive direction Past

Conclusion Past TCCo safety performance is not acceptable LCLS providing more prescriptive direction Past 2 months = acceptable performance Maintain CF & Technical System direct managed work performance The goal is Zero! June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 10 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

end of presentation June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 11 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

end of presentation June 17, 2008 FAC Review Michael Scharfenstein 11 scharf@slac. stanford. edu