ES 3053 Freshwater Hydrobiology Factors Determining the Distribution

ES 3053 Freshwater Hydrobiology Factors Determining the Distribution of Freshwater Biota: 1. © Tigroney Press Professor Nick Gray Trinity Centre for the Environment Trinity College Dublin

Leaning objectives ØTo understand the physical and chemical factors affecting the distribution of animals and plants in freshwaters ØTo appreciate how these factors interact to produce unique habitats and ecosystems

Factors affecting distribution of freshwater animals 1. Natural dispersion 2. Biotic factors 3. Abiotic factors

1. Natural Dispersion q Do they naturally occur here? q Ireland’s diversity low compared to UK and rest of Europe q Only migratory fish colonized naturally (e. g. eels, salmon, sea trout) q Rest introduced by man (e. g. Pike 1500 s; Roach 1889)

Exotic species • Exotics can have serious effect on ecology and economy – New diseases and parasites – Increased predation and competition – Increased oxygen demand caused by some species – Elimination of indigenous species – Possible damage to fisheries, amenity, navigation

2. Biotic Factors • Can be significant in determining whether a species occurs or not • Species precluded by: – Predation – Competition – Loss of suitable food reserves – Loss of habitat

3. Abiotic Factors • Chemically water is never found in pure state in nature because it is an excellent solvent. • Water quality is a function of precipitation, weathering of rocks, soils, plants, in fact anything water comes into contact with. • Water quality unique to sub-catchment

Main determinants of minerals and nutrients found in freshwaters are: – Occurrence of highly soluble weathered minerals (e. g. halite, gypsum) – Distance from coast line – Precipitation: run-off ratio for rivers – Occurrence of peat bogs, wetlands and marshes which release DOM – Other factors such as ambient temperature, thickness of weathered rock, organic composition of soils etc. – Anthropogenic inputs can have major influence on water quality Water quality depends on characterization of the hydrology, physico-chemical parameters and the biology.

Key abiotic factors in rivers • • River flow and substrate Dissolved oxygen and temperature Suspended solids Dissolved solids

Characteristics (Physical) of Rivers Downstream Ø Ø Ø Decreasing river slope Increasing depth Increasing volume of water Variable mean flow velocity (ms-1) Increasing discharge rate (m 3 s-1) Decreasing turbulence

Current (velocity) is not uniform in a river, so a single measurement gives erroneous estimates of velocity

Discharge rate (Q) The discharge rate equals the cross-sectional area of the river multiplied by the velocity of water through it Q = AV m 3 s-1 Q: volume of water past a given point per unit time A: cross-sectional area of the river, pipe, ditch V: mean current (velocity) in ms-1

Mean current velocity (V ) ( ms-1) is influenced by river slope s mean flow depth d and resistance to flow by banks and substrate f. Where g is the gravity constant 9. 81 So mean current V increases where slope s is steeper, the flow depth d is greater and the resistance to flow f is less So V varies along sections with an overall tendency to increase

Shear Stress (u) V is not important to benthic animals or in the determination of substrate, these are controlled by local forces known as shear stress or shear velocity. v. For an idealized channel where resistance to flow can be ignored µ can be calculated as: ms-1 Where g is the gravitational constant (9. 81), d flow depth (m) and s slope (m m-1).

Froude Number (Fr) Essentially the ratio of inertial to gravitational forces which is a good indicator of hydraulic stress on benthic organisms. Different to Reynolds Number, which is used to determine whether a flow will be laminar or turbulent. Where V is mean flow velocity (ms-1), d depth (m) and g the gravitational constant (9. 81 ms-1)

As the ratio increases the river becomes increasingly erosional. Example: Compare river site (a) mean velocity 0. 1 m s-1 and depth 0. 9 m with site (b) mean velocity 0. 6 m s-1 and depth 0. 2 m. River (a) Fr = 0. 1/2. 97 = 0. 034 (depositional) River (b) Fr = 0. 6/1. 40 = 0. 429 (erosional) Excellent for habitat description: Pools <0. 18 Riffles >0. 4 Intermediate values classed as glides/runs

ØFr is not a constant as both V and d vary. ØRainfall causes both V and d to increase. ØGenerally Fr falls due to d increasing more relative to V, protecting the biota from being scoured away. ØFr is the easiest assessment of shear stress in rivers.

Velocity: Depth Ratio (V: d) Depth measured in metres and Velocity in m sec-1 Excellent for habitat description, more widely used than Froude Number. • Riffle V: D >3. 20 • Pools V: D <1. 24 • Intermediate values classed as glides/runs • Like Froud Number avoid measuring values V and d in marginal areas. More information: Jowett, I. G. (1993) A method for objectively identifying pool, run and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27, (2), 241 -8.

Rivers can be classified as erosional or depositional in terms of their substrate. Erosion and deposition at river banks occur whenever there are bends in the channel creating source of solids.

So at any one point in the river there will be multiple habitats

Fluvial Geomorphology Course: http: //mrbdc. mnsu. edu/sites/mrbdc. mnsu. edu/files/public/event/warsss_12110 8/13_Rapid. Assessment. Tools_Nov 2008. pdf

Why is flow important? Flow is a critical factor in species distribution, species success, and both community structure and stability. Some species and families are strongly associated with flow regime Ø Changing weather patterns due to global warming is changing flow regimes o Increased flood events o Increased drought Ø Increased urbanization and water abstraction also leading to same effects Ø All effect riverine flow regimes and so ecology LIFE (Family)/ LIFE (Species) Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) is a method for linking benthic macroinvertebrate data to prevailing flow regimes

o A flow score (fs) is derived for each species/family (not both) using the species/family abundance and ecological association (flow group) with different flows LIFE = Sum(fs)/n where sum(fs) is the sum of the individual taxon flow scores for the whole sample, and n is the number of taxa used to calculate the sum(fs). Abundance categories (number of individuals) Flow group A (1 -9) B (10 -99) C (100 -999) D/E (1000+) I Rapid 9 10 11 12 II Moderate/fast 8 9 10 11 III Slow/sluggish 7 7 IV Flowing/standing 6 5 4 3 V Standing 5 4 3 2 VI Drought resistant 4 3 2 1 o As current velocity increases, so do LIFE scores <6. 00 generally indicate sluggish or still water conditions. o LIFE scores >7. 5 indicate very fast flows. Ref: Extence, C. A. , Balbi, D. M. and Chadd, R. P. (1999) River flow indexing using British benthic macroinvertebrates: A framework for setting hydro-ecological objectives. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. , 15: 543 -574.

More information: See Chapter 2 in Course Text