Environmental Policy I Context of American environmental policy

Environmental Policy

I. Context of American environmental policy: A. Environmental policy is more adversarial than in Europe. The disputes between regulatory agencies and business are far more bitter. B. Environmental policy is affected by federalism: Centralization/decentralization tension has increased between the national government and the state governments. The states have an incentive to reduce regulations for fear that businesses will relocate to other states, while the national government may want a uniform policy to effectively deal with environmental issues. C. The key issue has not been whether or not the environment should be protected, but the extent to which it should be protected and the costs of doing so. A delicate balance has tried to be achieved because environmental regulation involves so many competing interests: 1. The public wants a clean environment. 2. Business is concerned about the extent and the costs of changing its operations to produce a better environment. 3. Workers are concerned that excessive regulation may lead to the loss of jobs.

II. Key legislation: A. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: required environmental impact reports (EIR's) before major construction projects began. B. Air Quality Act of 1967 and the various Clean Air Acts from 1960 s-1990 s: established standards for cars and factories. C. After the Cuyahoga River caught fire, various Clean Water Acts of 1970 s-1990 s. D. Creation of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1970. E. CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards established in 1975 to set standards for average MPG for automobile manufacturers. F. As a result of Love Canal, the Superfund was created in 1980 to fund the cleanup of toxic waste dumps.

III. Four types of environmental policies: A. Entrepreneurial environmental policies. These involve programs that have narrowly-concentrated costs and widely- distributed benefits. Usually, there is great opposition from cost payers, but less support from beneficiaries since the benefits may be small, and since they may not even “see” the benefits. Example: Clean Air Act B. Majoritarian environmental policies. These involve programs that have widely-distributed costs and widely-distributed benefits Example: California Smog Check

C. Interest group environmental policies. These involve programs that have narrowly-concentrated costs and narrowly-concentrated benefits. Example: Sunrise Powerlink (Energy to San Diego from Imperial Valley through Cleveland National Forest) D. Client group environmental policies. These involve programs that have widely-distributed costs and narrowly- concentrated benefits. Example: Love Canal