ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING TOOLS METHOD CRITERIA FOR COMPUTING KPI

ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING TOOLS METHOD & CRITERIA FOR COMPUTING KPI FOR ATTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING By: Dato’ Dr Ahmad Kamarulnajuib Che Ibrahim Director General, Department of Environment Malaysia

Difference between CAC and GSR Please list the differences between command & control and GSR (at least 50 differences) 2

Command & Control GSR 1 Compliance Monitoring Performance Monitoring 2 At end of pipes At every Unit Process & Operation 3 Key Players : DOE, Chemistry Department Malaysia, AGC Key Players : Industry Management CEO, Industry Competent Person, DOE 4 Inspection and sampling by DOE Facilitate industries to achieve at final discharge point environmental sustainability Portrait high degree of environmental transparency, accountability and strong commitment among industries Immediate corrective action, EPMC & ECMC, record keeping, minilab, budget allocation, analyze , interpretation data, calibration, reporting & communication, instrument 3

* Average (mean) : Population Sampel Weighted Average :

* KATEGORI BILANGAN PREMIS Kilang Kelapa Sawit Kilang Getah Premis yang ditetapkan( PYDT) (BT) 453 60 403 Premis yang bukan ditetapkan (PYBDT) 42223 Loji Kumbahan 8058 JUMLAH 5 51, 197

* EMT NO DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY (EP) ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET (EB) ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING COMMITTEE (EMC) ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES (EF) ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCY (EC) ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING & COMMUNICATION (ERC) ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPARENCY (ET) TOTAL 4 5 6 7 X Y XY WEIGHTAGE, % 10 30 10 SCORE, % Y 1 Y 2 Y 3 WEIGHTED SCORE X 1 Y 1 X 2 Y 2 X 3 Y 3 10 20 10 Y 4 Y 5 Y 6 X 4 Y 4 X 5 Y 5 X 6 Y 6 10 Y 7 X 7 Y 7 100 ∑Y ∑XY ∑Y/7 (Y 1+Y 2+Y 3+…Yn) / n: STARIGHT AVERAGE (X 1 Y 1+X 2 Y 2+X 3 Y 3+. . . Xn. Yn) / (X 1+X 2+X 3+…Xn): WEIGHTED AVERAGE 6 ∑XY/∑X

* X EMT NO DESCRIPTION Y WEIGHTAGE, SCORE, % % 1 2 3 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY (EP) ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET (EB) ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING COMMITTEE (EMC) 4 ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES (EF) 5 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCY (EC) 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING & COMMUNICATION (ERC) 7 ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPARENCY (ET) TOTAL (Y 1+Y 2+Y 3+…Yn) / n: STARIGHT AVERAGE (X 1 Y 1+X 2 Y 2+X 3 Y 3+. . . Xn. Yn) / (X 1+X 2+X 3+…Xn): WEIGHTED AVERAGE 7 XY WEIGHTED SCORE 10 30 10 100 1000 3000 10 20 80 30 800 600 10 50 500 10 80 800 100 540 77. 14 7700 77 %

Step 1 : Assign weightage to each EMT. (X , expressed in percentage) Step 2 : Obtain scores for each EMT using respective criteria. (Y, expressed in percentage) Step 3 : Compute weighted score for each EMT by multiplying X with Y. (XY) Step 4 : Compute KPI based on Weighted Average Score, KPIWA = (X 1 Y 1 + X 2 Y 2 + X 3 Y 3 +. . . Xn. Yn) / (X 1 + X 2 + X 3 +…Xn) Step 5 : Compare KPIWA with a Straight Average Score, KPISA = (Y 1 + Y 2 + Y 3 +. . . Yn) / n Step 6 : Repeat step 1 - 5 for other premises 8

*EMT 1: ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY (EP) CRITERIA FOR SCORING SCORE A. EP was not prepared for the premise B. EP was prepared for the premise i. Reflects Management commitment in handling environmental pollution and control, in tandem with Self Regulation culture 0 30 ii. Reflects Management's new strategy in handling environmental pollution and control, in tandem with Self Regulation culture 30 iii. Evidence EP made aware to premise's staff iv. Evidence EP made aware to premise's contractors v. Evidence EP made aware to premise's suppliers vi. Evidence EP made aware to premise's other stakeholders vii. EP signed by top Management Representative viii. EP up-to-date Maximum possible score: 9 15 5 5 100

* CRITERIA FOR SCORING Max Poss SCORE A. Budget allocation for responsive 40 actions, including training, change in legislations, upgrade in EF i. Provision of regular environmental training programme ii. Adapt to change in legislation (more stringent) iii. Upgrade in the facilities iv. Others (please specify) 10 10 B. Environmental Facilities Score : Percent Score under EMT 4 x 20% = 20 20 C. Competent Person (CP) Score : Percent Score under EMT 5 x 20% = 20 D. Environmental Transparency Score : Percent Score under EMT 7 x 20% = 10 20 20 Maximum possible score: 20 100

*EMT 3: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING COMMITTEE (EMC) SCORE CRITERIA FOR SCORING A. ERCMC and/or EPMC not set up or formed B. ERCMC was set up: i. Organisation Chart to show ERCMC chaired by GM or CEO, and comprising Heads of Departments ii. Meeting record maintained minimum once a year iii. Agenda covers effectiveness of env policy and follow up actions? iv. Agenda covers new env regulatory amendments and implications? v. Agenda covers env improvement projects? vi. Agenda covers major initiatives on major non conformance (NC) issues? vii. Agenda covers env impact on procurement & purchasing policies? viii. Evidence of key findings from meetings disseminated to rest 11 of premise Total possible score: 0 5 10 10 5 5 50

* C. EPMC was set up: i. Organisation Chart to show EPMC chaired by a senior officer, and all PMC members officially appointed by GM or CEO 5 ii. Meeting record maintained minimum once quarterly 10 iii. Agenda covers overall compliance to env legislation at the operations level? 10 iv. Agenda covers performance of pollution control systems? 5 v. Agenda covers achievement in waste reduction targets? 5 vi. Agenda covers effectiveness of maintenance programme? 5 vii. Agenda covers env NC issues? 5 viii. Evidence of key findings from meetings disseminated upward & downward 5 Total possible score: 50 Maximum possible score: 100 12

* CRITERIA FOR SCORING A. Pollution Control Systems i. Complete suite of pollution control systems as required B. Best Management Practices (BMPs) i. Complete suite of BMPs as recommended. A. Mini Lab i. Complete with instruments of Performance Monitoring (PM). ii. Complete with testing equipment (in-situ & exsitu). iii. Up-to-date calibration certificates for all the instruments. iv. All instruments in good and working conditions. v. Complete sampling programme properly planned and executed? vi. Samples analysed in labs that are accreditated by JSM. vii. Systematic procedure established to maintain and file sample results categorically? Maximum possible score: 13 SCORE 35 25 10 5 5 5 100

* CRITERIA FOR SCORING SCORE i. Staff organisation clearly charts the position of Competent Persons (CP) as permanent staff 30 ii. Roles and responsibilities of CP clearly spelled out in the office of HR 30 iii. Official appointment letter of CPs signed by GM or CEO 20 iv. Qualifications of CP's maintained up-to-date 10 v. Record of continuing professional development of CPs maintained 10 Maximum possible score: 100 14

* CRITERIA FOR SCORING i. A systematic procedure and record keeping system on operation, maintenance and performance of PCMs, upset conditions, chemical usage ii. Record of analysis and interpretation of data in (i) in suitable format for presentation at PMC meetings iii. An internal reporting and communicating procedure to company staff established? iv. Evidence of implementation of internal reporting and communication? v. Online Environmental Reporting (OER)/e-SWIS established? vi. Online Environmental Reporting (OER)/e-SWIS implemented? vii. Platform to receive complaints or dissatisfaction on env reporting & communication structure available? 15 Maximum possible score: SCORE 25 10 10 100

* CRITERIA FOR SCORING SCORE A. Compliance status displayed for public viewing through 1 or more of the following means: i. Company website ii. Billboard at premise boundary or entrance 15 15 iii. Issuance of fliers on a scheduled basis 15 B. Environmental Sustainability Report to showcase success in managing environmental concerns and minimizing environmental footprint. 35 C. Setting up of CEMS 20 100 Maximum possible score: 16

Introduction - Content *Sustainability Highlights and Group Financial Performance Overview *Letter from President and Group Chief Executive Officer *Sustainable Development in PETRONAS *PETRONAS Corporate Sustainability Framework *About this Report *Sustainability Performance Data

Perbandingan Jumlah Pengemukaan FTR dan Jumlah OYB bagi Tahun 2006 - 2017 2500 2191 2000 1525 1500 1000 721 500 0 Ce. PSWa. M 242151 243 152 Ce. PBFO Ce. PSO 490 345 Ce. PIETSO (BP) 494 Ce. PIETSO (PCP) kemukakan FTR 2006 - 2017 18 162 64 94 54 Ce. PPOME Ce. PSTPO OYB

Thank You http: //www. doe. gov. my Director General Department of Environment 23 August 2017