Environment Safety and Health Steve Hoey ESH Manager

Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting February 8 -9 2011 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Outline • Baseline • Scope, Staffing • Progress since December 2009 • • • Design/Radiation safety, Operations, Authorization Basis, Construction Risks Project Safety Record Recommendation Status Look Ahead • FY 11 Goals • Issues Conclusions 2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

ESH Scope • ESH Support for: • Design – Conventional Facilities – Accelerator Systems – Experimental Systems • Operations – Experimental Facilities – Experimental Reviews • Construction – Ring Building – LOB’s • Authorization Basis – Safety Assessment Documents – Accelerator Safety Envelopes – BORE, Equipment Readiness Reviews, ARR’s 3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

ESH Program Responsibilities • • • Experiment safety review Work planning support Emergency planning Environmental management Hazardous waste management Industrial hygiene Industrial safety Radiation safety ESH Facility & Equipment Design 4 • • • Safety system configuration control Self-assessment Risk assessment Interlock testing • • • (radiation and laser) Tier I inspections Compliance audits Training development Document control Readiness Reviews Construction Safety BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Environment, Safety and Health Organization Environment, Safety and Health Manager – S. Hoey Deputy – A. Ackerman Construction Safety Lead K. Krasner ESH Design & Commissioning ESH Operations Manager Lead A. Ackerman S. Hoey Laboratory Support Radiation Control ESH Coordinator F. Zafonte EWH Radiation Physics L. Stiegler F. Flannigan T. Anschutz P. K. Job G. Wilson Industrial Hygiene Health Physics ESH Engineer W. R. Casey K. Klaus Environmental Compliance Safety Officer D. Bauer B. Chmiel Construction Torcon K. Krasner Readiness Evaluation B. Heneveld Authorization Basis N. Gmur COMMITTEES ALARA Committee Beam line Review Committee EMS/OHSAS Committee ES&H Committee C. Weilandics T. Conrad Safety Engineer Readiness Review T. Mc. Donald R. Travis ESH Assurance M. Buckley C. Nielson ES&H Improvement Committee Interlock Working Group Review Committee PS Directorate Safety Committee 5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Institutional ESH Related Support • Resources from the Lab ESH and Support Organizations are needed to support the following phases; • Ongoing “design review” activities • Ongoing operations & construction support (NSLS and NSLS-II) • BORE’s • Equipment/instrument readiness reviews • Authorization Basis documentation development & review Transition to • ARR’s Ops • Commissioning • Beam line development & commissioning • NSLS-II operations • Decommissioning - 725 6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

• • • Progress - Radiation Safety Workshop June 22 -23, 2010 (third workshop) Participants – ALS, APS, SSRL, ESRF Chaired by Paul Berkvens Outcome: • Followed up on recommendations made at previous workshops (3/07 & 4/08) all prior recommendations closed, (15 from this workshop) • Provided feedback and lessons learned on workshop topical areas, beam line installation and accelerator commissioning • Received Committee’s concurrence that strategies for radiation safety for NSLS-II are sound and moving in the right direction “The committee is highly impressed with the progress that has been made to-date in 7 working and resolving radiation BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Progress - Area Monitors • Locations for area monitors have been planned for Linac, Booster, Storage Ring and beam enclosures (~60 units) • Area monitors will provide warnings locally and in control room and be interlocked to injection through PPS for high alarms • Monitors from 3 prospective vendors have been purchased, installed and tested at NSLS for. Testing included: Mirion, Apantec, HPI • Comparison between units • Determine response to short pulse length radiation during injection • Evaluate long term stability of detector and reliability of unit • Permit better specification of units for final procurement • Two phase procurement: • 3 units procured Fall 2010 for Linac commissioning • Additional 52 units procured Spring 2011 for Booster and Storage Ring commissioning (award 8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Progress - ESH Operations • NSLS ESH Operations and NSLS-II Operations are now combined • Includes significant footprint increase (research and development, assembly 725 areas) – NSLS – 162, 156 ft 2 (Exp floor = 123, 644 ft 2) • 726 – NSLS - Mechanical Tech Support 3519 ft 2 727 – NSLS – Mech/Magnet Measurement 3519 ft 2 729 - NSLS Source Development Lab – 8018 ft 2 902/905 – Magnet test and assembly, vacuum – 22, 690 ft 2 703 – Experimental Facilities Division, 9 new labs – 7, 360 ft 2 945 – Vacuum lab – 4, 068 ft 2 832 – RF development, magnetic measurement – 7, 895 Risk ft 2 well understood & Controlled – lab work, mechanical 820 – Front Ends Diagnostics – 5, 700 ft 2 • Assembly, chemicals, haz waste etc. • Work processes covered by 24 Project Safety Review Forms (PSRF’s) fully implemented 9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Progress - Construction Safety • Contractor performing better than industry • average Many programmatic enhancements & best practices; • Increased use and detail of PHA’s • Increased communications – daily ESH planning mtgs; weekly ESH Mgmt mtgs; monthly ESH group mtgs, schedule and coordination mtgs with ESH. • Modified Safety Incentive – workers receive 90% • On site medical provider – NYS trained EMT’s • Drug screening, pre-employment and post 10 incident/cause BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Progress-Transition from Construction • • • Laboratory Beneficial Occupancy Readiness Review process will be used Officially turns over sections of facility to allow machine installation Specific NSLS-II BORE Plan in place that; • Defines scope • Establishes schedule • Identifies resources Baseline BORE’s start Feb 2011 and go through June 2012 total of 10 BORES to match construction phases Pre-BORE’s started Nov 1, 2010 (phase walk downs) 11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Risk Analysis & Management Category Description Risk Rankin g Management ESH Minor or major injury or Construction mishap, conventional construction, R&D Ops through technical equipment installation, Prime contractor coordination Medium ESH Construction Plan (HASP); Contractor Prequalification; Safety Incentive; Dedicated CSE’s, contractor qualification; work planning & control; communications ESH Low Formal Design Reviews; (Reduce SME input; Extensive use of d from Lessons Learned Medium) Design Major change driven by ESH design Oversight or changing regulation (ring bldg and tech equipment) ESH Site Prepexcavation Legacy contamination identified during excavation, protected species impacting construction Retired Authorizatio Possibility of DOE Order 12 Retired Extensive site evaluation; Monitoring of protected species BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE Active participation in ASO

Injury Summary • Operations: • 3/10/09 Recordable – Technician infection from splinter • Construction: • 7/16/09 Recordable – sub-contractor moving conduit chipped tooth • 9/30/09 DART – sub-contractor broken leg from rebar impact • 2/22/10 Recordable – sub-contractor fractured finger tip • 4/22/10 Recordable – sub-contractor cut leg with hammer claw • 7/26/10 DART – sub-contractor cut palms moving decking • 10/21/10 DART – sub-contactor pulled back muscle 13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Project Safety Record (through December 2010) Hours Worked Recorda ble Cases Recorda ble Rate NSLS-II Staff pre FY 09 341, 100 0 0 NSLS-II Staff FY 09 320, 396 1 . 62 NSLS-II Staff FY 10 432, 272 0 0 NSLS-II Staff FY 11 to date 107, 800 0 NSLS-II Staff Cumulative 1, 201, 5 68 Contractors FY 09 Recorda DAR Dart DART ble T Rat TARGET Case e DOE s (Gen Ind) 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 17 0 0 60, 208 2 6. 64 1 3. 3 2 Contractors FY 10 331, 424 3 1. 81 1 . 60 Contractors FY 11 to date 112, 411 1 1. 8 14 . 65 1. 8 (4. 7) DART’s also count as TRC’s for rate calculations . 25 . 6 (2. 5) BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Recommendation Status • Continue to evaluate and improve oversight • • • of contractors and subcontractors and their contractor and subcontractor ES&H programs. Closed The project should begin planning now for the required safety readiness reviews (internal) for beam line commissioning. Closed (will cover in later presentation) The renegotiation of the safety incentive on the ring building should be completed. Closed New safety incentive 15 should be included in BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

FY 11 Goals • Development of the Linac and Booster Commissioning SAD’s, ASE’s and supporting documentation • Coordinate the BORE’s for transition to construction and manage findings • Develop acceptance and readiness processes for equipment installation • Provide ESH support for the radiological safety design of beam lines; design of the supplementary shielding; Personal Protection and Equipment Protection systems • Finalize area monitor testing/selection and initiate procurement • Maintain improving trend in construction contractor(s) performance and quickly bring the new prime up to a best in class level 16 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Issues • Coordination of prime construction contractors (Torcon & EWH) will need consistency of ESH implementation • Laboratory resources to support Transition to Operations will need to be managed • Increase in number of reviews) 17 beam lines (and BL BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE

Summary • ESH Program is well defined and documented • ESH Staff is well qualified and in place • Performance metrics are trending positively • Early deficiencies in construction safety program implementation have been addressed and processes are in place to move forward safely with minimum risk • On track with authorization basis process including BORE, SAD’s and ASE’s • Program is continually improving & incorporating Lessons Learned 18 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE