ENTSOE CIM implementation Olivier Aine CIM user group

ENTSO-E CIM implementation Olivier Aine CIM user group 7 June 2018, Ljubljana 1

Content • • • What is ENTSO-E? Network codes implementation Why ENTSO-E uses the CIM? Success stories and lessons learnt Future developments

What is ENTSO-E 3

Our network “Enabling the energy transition”

ENTSO-E in numbers 43 TSOs, 36 countries 1 136 795 MW 500+ million 3 597, 1 TWh citizens served 478 132 km cross-frontier transmission lines net generation capacity electricity consumpion 424 139 GWh of electricity exchanged between TSOs 5

2009 1. 0 Foundation Development of mandates: codes, TYNDP 2014 2. 0 Work products 2. 0 Board strategy for more leadership in energy transition 2017 3. 0 NC implementation 2020 4. 0 NC implemented Clean Energy Package draft Data platforms and tools New codes on cybersecurity and flexibility? Regional cooperation CEP entry into force 2025 5. 0 In the middle of implementation of the Clean Energy Package…?

Network codes implementation 7

The code families https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=GUj. RJ_a 93 Pc 8

The code families CIM 9

Timelines Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management Forward Capacity Allocation Electricity Balancing System Operation 2009 … 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CACM implementation Third Energy Package Network codes FCA implementation EBGL implementation SOGL implementation 10

Projects from the codes • • • • • Imbalance Netting EU platform Replacement Reserve EU platform Automatic Restoration Reserve EU platform Manual Restoration Reserve EU platform Cross Zonal Capacity Allocation for balancing Single Allocation Platform Harmonised Physical Transmission Right Nomination Rules Day ahead and Intraday Market Coupling Coordinated Capacity Calculation (including flow based) Common Grid Model Methodology Publications to ACER Coordinated Security Analysis IGM/CGM merging for Y-1, DA and ID including boundary management Operational Planning Data Environment (OPDE) Outage Planning Coordination (Pan-European and regional) Short-Medium Term Adequacy Assessment forecast Pan-European Verification Function Market Operation 11

Two examples of projects Electricity balancing Common Grid Model 12

Electricity Balancing FCR • Automatic activation • Up to 15 minutes a. FRR • Automatic activation • 30 s to 15 min m. FRR • Semi-automatic or manual activation • Min. 15 min Δf Frequency (50 Hz) Total balancing energy (idealized) Balancing energy t 0+30 s Sync. area t 0+5 min t 0+15 min t 0+45 min Time Affected TSO 13

Electricity Balancing All TSOs governance CZ capacity BSPs TSO N Bids EU EU EU platform Demands Offer which must be activated (activation call) TSO 1 Satisfied imbalance needs TSO N BSPs … TSO 1 … BSPs Used cross-border capacity BSPs Settlement European platforms coordinate balancing energy activation requests of TSOs. Communication with national BSPs remains local. Platform describes business processes on European level supported by different functions potentially performed by different IT systems. Page 14 14

Common Grid Model • Merging IGM to CGM • Enable services from the Regional Security Coordinators 15

CGM dependent Business Processes Individual Grid Model (IGM) production Master Date Network Model Outage Planning Market data IGM validation CGM publication Network Security Analysis Boundery Manage -ment Loca l Quality Control EMS / Operational Planning Network Planning IGMs Merge Market data Execute Operational Services Pan European Verification Function (PEVF) Outage Planning Short Term Adequancy Transmission System Operator CGM Aligment Function Regional Security Coordination Capacity Alocation

Grid Model across Time Horizons Grid Planning Grid extension Year ahead Market & Operational Planning Maintenance Month ahead Week ahead Capacity & Security Day ahead Security Intraday Confidence level Execution Real-time 17

Common Grid Model 18

ECP ECCo SP EDX Based on MADES (IEC 62325 -503) ECP provides Security Integration Transparency Reliability Standard Portability EDX Publish/subscribe provides Integration channels Service providers Consumers 19

Why ENTSO-E uses the CIM ESMP and CGMES 20

So why should we use the CIM? https: //transparency. entsoe. eu/ https: //tyndp. entsoe. eu/ 21

So why should we use the CIM? • Question appeared already in 2009 when ENTSO-E was mandated to build the Transparency Platform and the Ten-Year-Network-Development-Plan (TYNDP) • • In these two projects, 43 TSOs needs to send their data to a central platform (which need to understand them) • Therefore, a standardized format is needed for the data exchanges. • In 2012, ENTSO-E choose to use the CIM 22

How ENTSO-E became a proactive user of the CIM 1. ENTSO-E has Working Groups of TSOs expert to work on the data formats and liaises with IEC TC 57 WG 13 -WG 14 and WG 16 2. ENTSO-E maintains close collaboration with Network code drafting, implementation project and CIM profile development 3. ENTSO-E follows step-by-step approach from use case to sequence diagram to profile 23

1: ENTSO-E WGs and liaisons Liaisons with IEC TC 57 WG 13/14/16 Liaison with IEC TC 57 WG 10 CIM Exp ert G (ED I+CG roup MW P 2 ) Ah. G 6185 0 (Hierarchy)

2: ENTSO-E collaboration structure IEC/CENELEC ENTSO-E Draft the Network Codes Regulated by ACER / NRAs Draft profiles in WGs implement NC projects Standardization process Liaison D Maintenance requests

3: ENTSO-E step-by-step approach • Business Requirement Specification • Identification of Generic Use Cases Network codes drafting Standardization analysis • Map GUCs to SGAM • Locate requirements for standards • Sequence Diagram • Identify existing standards and new gaps • Definition of standardization projects Standardization preliminary phase Standardization preparatory phase • Work on existing, modified and new standards, including profiles • Close collaboration with Network Codes implementation projects • Test on functions and interoperability • Publication of standards in IEC and/or CENELEC Standardization approval phase Generic Use Cases (GUC) 26

Success stories and lessons learnt 27

CIM profile for the balancing XB Capacity BSP s Transparency balancing TSO 1. . . Bids Needs TSO Res n bid* (ERRP) ATC (ECAN) remaining XB capacity EU balancing Platform MOL* (ERRP)TSO 1 Offer which must be activated & needs satisfied Incremental XB schedules Schedule (ESS) . . . TSO n BSP s Reporting Verification doc platform Transparency platform Energy Account Settlement process 28

CGMES profile for IGM / CGM merging TS IEC 61970 -600 -1 – Energy Management System Application Program Interface (EMS-API) – Part 600 -1: Common Grid Model Exchange Specification (CGMES) – Structure and rules (proposed IEC 61970 -600 -1 TS) TS IEC 61970 -600 -2 – Energy Management System Application Program Interface (EMS-API) – Part 600 -2: Common Grid Model Exchange Specification (CGMES) – Exchange profiles specification (proposed IEC 61970 -600 -2 TS) CGMES IEC 61970 -552 IEC 61970 -301 IEC 61970 -302 Individual Grid Models (IGMs) Boundary Data IEC 61970 -452 EQ [. xml] IEC 61970 -453 SSH [. xml] SV [. xml] IEC 61970 -456 IEC 61970 -457 IEC 61968 -4 TP [. xml] EQ_BD [. xml] TP_BD [. xml] 29

All our CIM profiles are on ENTSOE. EU https: //www. entsoe. eu/publications/electronic-datainterchange-edi-library/ https: //www. entsoe. eu/digital/common-informationmodel/ 30

Challenges and future developments • More and more business process link the grid model and the electricity market • CGMES was first built for grid planning, some further improvement will be needed for system operation • Even when there's none left, there are still some: after the network codes will come the Clean energy package (4 th package) • Clean Energy Package is more oriented towards DSO: • Network codes on distributed flexibilities? • CIM for retail market? • CGMES for DSO use cases? • CIM to support TSO/DSO data exchanges? • ENTSO-E participates to the H 2020 EU funded project TDX ASSIST • ENTSO-E participates to the SGTF on data format and procedures 31

Thank you Olivier Aine – olivier. aine@entsoe. eu