ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File Alan Nichols

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File Alan Nichols 1 Jagdish Tuli 2 International Atomic

ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File Alan Nichols 1 Jagdish Tuli 2 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria 2 National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA 1 10, 11 November 2008 International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency

COMPREHENSIVE DATABASES: WHY? • • • maintenance of well-defined data archives for future generations

COMPREHENSIVE DATABASES: WHY? • • • maintenance of well-defined data archives for future generations interplay between nuclear reaction and decay data studies to define nuclear parameters to good accuracy significant impact of recommended data on developing nuclear theories assists in resolution of contradictory results identifies requirements and stimulates measurements benefits in applied areas - nuclear engineering, nuclear medicine, analytical and environmental sciences, etc. International Atomic Energy Agency

INTRODUCTION ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File organised multinational effort to maintain a comprehensive

INTRODUCTION ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File organised multinational effort to maintain a comprehensive set of nuclear structure data files International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators (NSDD) – biennial meetings International Atomic Energy Agency

International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators (NSDD) • Collaborating multinational team

International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators (NSDD) • Collaborating multinational team of nuclear structure and decay data evaluators • Maintain and update ENSDF (Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File) • Master database held at NNDC, BNL, USA • Individual regular communications • Biennial meetings held since 1974 under the auspices of the IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

Major NSDD products ENSDF - www. nndc. bnl. gov/ensdf - J. K. Tuli, NNDC

Major NSDD products ENSDF - www. nndc. bnl. gov/ensdf - J. K. Tuli, NNDC Contents: Evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all known nuclei, organized into over 290 mass chains Decay data + + -n etc. International Atomic Energy Agency ENSDF Reaction data (HI, xn ) (p, p') (n, ), (n, xn ) Coulomb Exc. ( , '), ( , xn ) (d, p), etc. Adopted data best values Levels: E, J , T 1/2, , Q, configurations Gammas: E , BR, M, , ICC

ENSDF: Major Data Sources and Derivatives Contributing Databases: Atomic Masses Nuclear Science References (NSR)

ENSDF: Major Data Sources and Derivatives Contributing Databases: Atomic Masses Nuclear Science References (NSR) (Wapstra & Audi) MC Codes q MCNPX q GEANT ENSDF IE ORTEC & CANBERRA Derivative Databases: NUBASE Derivative Publications: International Atomic Energy Agency MIRD RIPL JANIS Nu. Dat RADWARE …

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators Long-Term Contributors:

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators Long-Term Contributors: Emerging New Contributors: CANADA CHINA FRANCE JAPAN KUWAIT RUSSIA USA AUSTRALIA BULGARIA INDIA others needed International Atomic Energy Agency 6. 70 FTE (USA & Canada) 2. 00 FTE Total: 8. 70 FTE

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators: responsible centres

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators: responsible centres – November 2008 Centre FTE CNDC, Beijing, China 0. 25 NNDC, USA 2. 10 Jilin, China 0. 25 ORNL, USA 0. 25 B-le-Chãtel, France 0. 20 LBNL, USA 1. 70 JAEA, Japan 0. 45 TUNL, USA 0. 60 Kuwait 0. 20 ANL, USA 0. 55 PNPI, Russia 0. 25 Mc. Master, Canada 1. 50 ANU, Australia 0. 20 IIT, India 0. 20 2. 00 International Atomic Energy Agency 6. 70 TOTAL 8. 70

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators: responsible centres

International Network Connections International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators: responsible centres fluctuating total of 8. 70 FTE per annum “at least 12 FTE per annum required to keep ENSDF in reasonably good shape” - Jagdish Tuli (coordinator of ENSDF, NNDC) Summary Report(s) of an IAEA Technical Meeting, Coordination of the International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators, 6 -10 June 2005, Mc. Master University, Hamilton, Canada; 11 -15 June 2007, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation International Atomic Energy Agency

Multinational mass chain evaluations for ENSDF: numbers of responsible laboratories/institutes Year 1981 1986 1996

Multinational mass chain evaluations for ENSDF: numbers of responsible laboratories/institutes Year 1981 1986 1996 2008 North America 6 6 Europe 6 5 4 1 (→ 0) Russia 2 2 2 1 Japan 1 1 China - - 1 2 Rest of the World 1 1 1 3 16 15 15 14 (→ 13) International Atomic Energy Agency

Multinational mass chain evaluations for ENSDF: numbers of responsible laboratories/institutes 1981: Europe BELGIUM FRANCE

Multinational mass chain evaluations for ENSDF: numbers of responsible laboratories/institutes 1981: Europe BELGIUM FRANCE FRG NETHERLANDS SWEDEN UK ↓ 2008: Europe FRANCE * Long-Term Contributors CANADA * CHINA FRANCE * JAPAN * KUWAIT RUSSIA USA * * ~ 60% of evaluators are close to retirement age (or beyond!) IAEA/ICTP NSDD training workshops have achieved some success International Atomic Energy Agency

OECD Global Science Forum: Report of the Working Group on Nuclear Physics, May 2008

OECD Global Science Forum: Report of the Working Group on Nuclear Physics, May 2008 OECD (thirty Member countries): “…identify good practices and agree on decisions and action recommendations ………. Helping ensure development beyond OECD membership has been part of the Organisation’s mission from the start…” page 4: Success in basic research and its applications relies on systematic, accurate measurements and accumulation of nuclear data in certified, reliable databases. In some areas, such as nuclear energy, there is strong international coordination through agencies such as the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, the IAEA, and the US Nuclear Data Program. However, the Working Group finds that gaps exist in the international plans for the coordination and oversight of these databases, and that available resources are insufficient. International Atomic Energy Agency

OECD Global Science Forum: Report of the Working Group on Nuclear Physics, May 2008

OECD Global Science Forum: Report of the Working Group on Nuclear Physics, May 2008 page 4, Recommendation: The national agencies should work together with international organisations, such as the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, The International Atomic Energy Agency, and the international science community, to create a more comprehensive international plan to acquire and curate nuclear data for the wider community. International Atomic Energy Agency

Multinational mass chain evaluations Europe: What might be done? And do you want to

Multinational mass chain evaluations Europe: What might be done? And do you want to do it? • contribute “at your weight” in carrying out mass chain evaluations for ENSDF (through the International Network of NSDD Evaluators) • establish a consortium of interested parties within an existing or new European Programme? • to be addressed by laboratories/institutes already involved in nuclear structure and decay data measurements International Atomic Energy Agency

HELP !!! International Atomic Energy Agency

HELP !!! International Atomic Energy Agency

HELP !!! ENSDF JOIN YOUR COUNTRY’S EFFORT God help and save the ENSDF database

HELP !!! ENSDF JOIN YOUR COUNTRY’S EFFORT God help and save the ENSDF database NEW MASS CHAIN EVALUATORS REQUIRED NOW !!! Volunteers: contact JK Tuli (NNDC, BNL) International Atomic Energy Agency

NSDD Network – collaborators Argentina: E. Achterberg, O. A. Capurro & G. V. Marti;

NSDD Network – collaborators Argentina: E. Achterberg, O. A. Capurro & G. V. Marti; Australia: T. Kibédi; Bulgaria: D. L. Balabanski & S. P. Lalkovski; Canada: J. A Cameron, C. Ouellet & B. Singh; China: Ge Zhigang, Huang Xiaolong, Z. Chunmei, Huo Junde, Huo Su & Wu Zhendong; France: J. Blachot; India: A. K. Jain, A. Ghosh, Suresh Kumar, Sukhjeet Singh & M. Gupta; Japan: J. Katakura, Y. Tendow, T. Tamura, K. Kitao, A. Hashizume, H. Iimura & M. Kanbe; Kuwait: A. R. Farhan; Russian Federation: I. A. Mitropolsky, Yu. Khazov, A. A. Radionov & S. Sakharov; USA: E. Browne, D. J. A. De Frenne, C. W. Reich, A. A. Sonzogni & J. K. Tuli (NNDC); C. M. Baglin, M. S. Basunia & R. B. Firestone (LBNL); M. J. Martin, C. Nesaraja & M. S. Smith (ORNL); J. H. Kelley, E. Kwan, D. R. Tilley & H. R. Weller (TUNL); F. G. Kondev & C. Chiara (ANL); N. Nica (Texas A&M); A. L. Nichols & D. H. Abriola (IAEA) International Atomic Energy Agency

Proposals and recommendations of this meeting: ALN invited to write an editorial for March

Proposals and recommendations of this meeting: ALN invited to write an editorial for March 2009 issue of Nuclear Physics News Nu. PECC Deadline of 19 December 2008 International Atomic Energy Agency