Encapsulation For MPLS Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking

  • Slides: 9
Download presentation
Encapsulation For MPLS Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method draft-cheng-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-02 Weiqiang Cheng Xiao Min

Encapsulation For MPLS Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method draft-cheng-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-02 Weiqiang Cheng Xiao Min Tianran Zhou Ximing Dong Yoav Peleg chengweiqiang@chinamobile. com xiao. min 2@zte. com. cn zhoutianran@huawei. com dxm@fiberhome. com yoav. peleg@broadcom. com IETF-106 Nov 2019, Singapore 1

Requirements of MPLS PM The quantity of backhaul network nodes is huge usually, e.

Requirements of MPLS PM The quantity of backhaul network nodes is huge usually, e. g. There are over 30 k nodes of backhaul nodes in Beijing City. The operation and maintenance is really challenging. We need more simple and effective MPLS PM, especially for SR-TE. 2

Intention of this draft • Defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance measurement with alternate

Intention of this draft • Defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance measurement with alternate marking method: – Alternate marking method requires one color bit of data packet to measure packet loss of data traffic flow – Alternate marking method requires one more timestamp bit of data packet to measure delay and jitter of data traffic flow – Alternate marking method requires flow identification of the measured data traffic flow 3

Flow-based PM Encapsulation • One Flow-ID Indicator Label (special-purpose label) followed by one Flow-ID

Flow-based PM Encapsulation • One Flow-ID Indicator Label (special-purpose label) followed by one Flow-ID label which includes: − Flow-ID: 20 -bits MPLS flow identification − L bit: Loss Measurement color marking − D bit: Delay Measurement color marking − S bit: Bottom of Stack indicator 4

The relationship between this draft and the SFL drafts • They’re NOT mutual exclusive,

The relationship between this draft and the SFL drafts • They’re NOT mutual exclusive, but complementary • How can SFL method achieve the function required by this scenario illustrated above? 5

Procedures of Flow-ID allocation • Manual Trigger: manually input the characteristics of the measured

Procedures of Flow-ID allocation • Manual Trigger: manually input the characteristics of the measured IP traffic flow • Automatic Trigger: the ingress node sends the characteristics of the ingoing IP traffic flow by IPFIX 6

Deployment Scenario • From left diagram we see stitched SR tunnels • From right

Deployment Scenario • From left diagram we see stitched SR tunnels • From right diagram we see end-to-end VPN services • So we need PM on both SR tunnels and VPN services 7

Deployment Real Case • In Shanghai/Beijing, China Mobile has already deployed the PM method

Deployment Real Case • In Shanghai/Beijing, China Mobile has already deployed the PM method described in this draft • It works very well and our operation team gave very good feedback on it 8

Next steps • Ask for WG adoption IETF-106 Nov 2019, Singapore 9

Next steps • Ask for WG adoption IETF-106 Nov 2019, Singapore 9