Employee survey 2018 RESULTS HUV Employee Survey 2018

Employee survey 2018 – RESULTS HUV

Employee Survey 2018 2 419 people made their voice heard this year throw the Employee survey and the result will be presented and worked within the whole organization. The result will be the base for further development and improvement in our organization. The survey is anonymous. This means that no results will be shown for a group or segment with fewer than five responses. With five responses, an index value can be shown. A further three responses are required to show the distribution of the possible answers. Period: 2018 -01 -22— 2018 -02 -11 Total amount of surveys sent: 3107 Total amount of initiated surveys: 2540 Total amount of answers: 2419 Amount of reminders: 4 Response rate: 78% (2016: 74%) HUV: 43

e. NPS – What is it? e. NPS, the Employee Net Promoter Score©, is a key indicator showing willingness to recommend your workplace - internally or externally. The question asked is: “How likely is it that you would recommend your workplace to a friend or acquaintance? ” and the answer scale ranges from “ 0. Not at all likely” to “ 10. Extremely likely”. Those who give high answers (9– 10) are known as ambassadors. As well as speaking positively about their workplace on their own initiative, they also develop their work and motivate three other employees to participate. Those who answer with 7– 8 on the scale are regarded as passively satisfied. These are people who are satisfied but do not actively tell people about it. Passively satisfied employees may be as satisfied as employees anywhere else. Those who give low answers (0– 6) are known as critics, and are likely to speak negatively about their workplace. They may be more or less critical depending on where on the negative part of the scale they are. Those who are far down the scale focus on problems and may encourage others to seek to leave the workplace, while those who are higher up the scale (5 or 6) might say: “It’s good, BUT…” NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc. , Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Employee Net Promoter Score RED = More detractors than promoters GREEN = More promoters than detractors How likely is it that you would recommend SLU as a place of work to a friend or acquaintance? NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc. , Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Product Net Promoter Score RED = More detractors than promoters GREEN = More promoters than detractors How likely are you to recommend studying at SLU? NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc. , Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Result index areas - overview Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Employee Index 2018 Your result Totalt SLU EI index is a merged value of the 19 Index questions in the areas: Working environment: 6 questions Management: 7 questions Organisation: 3 questions Visions & Goals: 3 questions Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working Environment Working environment area contains 27 questions, out of which 6 are index questions. The area measures conditions, relationships and commitment among the group. When the work environment is good, employees will not only try to find balance in being loyal to their employer and colleagues but also to themselves as an individual and to their relatives. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Management area contains 26 questions, out of which 6 are index questions. This area shows how the immediate leadership works and also gives input of requirement for development and improvement of the area. The result is monitored mainly by the manager with the help of his/her boss and if necessary by HR. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Organisation The Organisation area contains 23 questions, out of which three are index questions. The area Organisation show together with the area Vision and goals the overall conditions an employer gives to create a supportive and promoting leadership with effective and healthy groups. In this area you find questions about management on all levels above immediate manager. It is mainly the management and individuals with operations-wide functions that work with this result. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Visions and Goals Vision and goals area contains 4 questions, out of which 3 are index questions. The area Vision and Goals together with Organisation shows the overall pre-subsidence an employer gives to create a supportive and promoting leadership with effective and healthy groups. It is mainly the management and individuals with business-wide functions that work with this result. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Motivators The section is created by five indicators of motivation. Motivators are the driving forces that gives the desire to continue doing a good job. And that creates commitment and loyalty. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Balance The section is created by seven indications for balance in work and life. Being able to relax from work, have a good sleep and a good balance between work and private life is preventive against negative stress and will help create a good health. Balance The question Stress, recovery has only been answered by them who rated 1, 2 or 3 to the question After an intense period. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Good conditions The section is created by five indicators for the right conditions. To be able to influence the work situation employees needs to have good conditions concerning responsibilities, authorites and also requirement and control. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Objectives The section is created by three indicators on performance management. To know if you're working on the right things and to measure what you do leads forward, clear and communicated goals are needed. The section goals has only been answered by them who have individual objectives (Yes I have agreed objectives related to my work). Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Team This section is created by eight indicators for effective and productive groups. The section measures conditions, relationships and commitments amongst the group. Efficient and wellfunctioning groups need to work together, show respect, allow different opinions and to support and encourage each other. Over 70 % good result 60 -69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Next step? - Continue our work regarding discrimination – on all levels - Focus on balance and work load in the Staff development review - Discussions in August (preliminary 27 -28 August)

Shortening Conditions Feel job satisfaction Involved in decision making Appreciation Professional and private life More recovery time Responsibility Manager anticipates Confidence - staff Manager leads Manager supports Manager is attentive Confidence - manager Manager feedback Discrimination Confidence univ. management team Information Pride Business concept permeates Clear organisation Question text I have clear assignments with reasonable conditions I feel job satisfaction In my working group we have the opportunity to influence and be involved in decision-making In my working group show each other appreciation when we do something well. I feel that there is a good balance between my working life and my personal life I feel that there is time for reflection in my work I have a clear view of my area of responsibility My immediate manager leads by example My immediate manager has confidence in me as an employee. Workload contributes Interesting tasks Learn new things Meaningful Amount of work After intense period Relax Stress, sleep Realistic targets Power I believe my efforts contribute and are important I think my tasks are interesting and rewarding I learn new things and develop in my daily work I find my work meaningful I am happy with my workload in general An intensive period is usually followed by a calmer period that offers opportunity for recovery and reflection. I can unwind from my work in my free time During the last six months, I've had problems falling alsleep, or I've ben waking up during the night, due to my work. (After an intense day at work, I don't feel rested and refreshed when I return the next day) feel that my objectives are realistic and achievable I have a clear view of my authority My immediate manager leads and drives the organisation in a way that enables us to achieve Conditions I have clear assignments with reasonable conditions our department/unit/team objectives. I feel that my immediate manager supports, encourages and inspires me as an employee Requirements and skills I think that there is a good balance between the demands that my job places on me and my skills and ability notices my good achievements (for example, through increased responsibility, increased trust, Control and planning I am able to manage and plan my own work (speed, scope, new opportunities for development, etc. ). prioritisation, etc. ) I have confidence in my immediate manager's (#ovrigt 10#) way of managing and developing Motivating targets I feel motivated by my work objectives my department/unit/team. gives me sufficient feedback on my performance and work results Prioritise targets I know how to prioritise my tasks in relation to my objectives I consider SLU to be a workplace that supports equal rights (regardless of ethnicity, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion or age). I have confidence in the way the vice-chancellor and the university management is managing and developing our operations. The vice-chancellor has appointed a management team that consists of the vice-chancellor, the deputy vice-chancellor, two pro vice-chancellors (responsible for environmental monitoring and assessment and external collaboration respectively) and the head of university administration. All in all, I feel sufficiently informed about what happens within SLU, and I know where to find information about it. I am proud to work at SLU. Working together Stress, recovery time In my working group we work well together During the last six months, I've had problems recovering due to my work. (After an intense day at work, I don't feel rested and refreshed when I return the next day) Commitment In my working group we are motivated and want to evolve Open-minded In my working group we are open minded and everyone has their say. In my working group we have the ability to see and make use of the skills within the group In my working group we treat each other with respect even when we have different opinions In my working group we are responsive and help and support each other. Uses skills Our mission statement permeates the entire organisation. Respect I think it is clear who or which department/unit is responsible for what throughout SLU, and who to contact with various questions or assignments. Support