EMEP observations for Copernicus Kjetil Trseth EMEPCCC TFMM

EMEP observations for Copernicus Kjetil Tørseth EMEP-CCC TFMM, Praha, 4. May 2017

Copernicus by numbers • «Space component» - «In Situ component» - «Service component» • ~700 mill. € per annum in total including sentinels - Cost share: EU 67%, ESA 33% • benefits of the data to the EU economy estimated at roughly 30 billion euros through 2030 (2 -3 x cost) Countries now need to justify these investments, and funding is directed to allow the expected economic benefits!

Intro to copernicus

Invitation from Copernicus • Access to EMEP data is requested, budget to support efforts of 400 k€ in total over 4 years • Similar contracts with EEA, ACTRIS, WMO-GAW, ICOS, +++ • Service for everyone, not exclusive to CAMS! • Validated and «real time» data of interest (~Near real time…)

ACTRIS_NRT

GAW-WDCA_NRT

Ebas-nrt-showcase. nilu. no

Tools and services • Data submissions • EBAS-web (_NRT projects) • NRT-showcase • ECMWF-service developed • WIS-DCPC in operation • GEOSS and WIGOS compatible

What’s in it for…. ? CLRTAP/EMEP politically Data providers • Copernicus (GMES) is high on the political agenda • Major developments ongoing relevant for EMEP, wants to make use of existing observations • Mutual interest through collaboration • Demonstrates use of data/importance of EMEP (helpful for funding) EMEP centres (in particular for CCC) • Secures that tools and data arrangements are utilized • Adds some financial resources to allow further development • More active engagement with providers • Opens for more immediate production of model results External data users/society • EMEP information as open and rapidly available as possible • Innovations, New services/developments can be established • Outreach, education, media, population, health, aviation… • Offers easy access to EMEP data nationally and internationally: • • QAQC, more use, earlier detection of errors etc Basis for interpretation Advice to stakeholders when episodes occur Scientific collaboration • Increase discovery and use of data • Evolve monitoring strategy • Improved data reporting routines -> Improved visibility of EMEP monitoring

Potential #instruments – likely to increase ~250€ per instrument per year

Way forward: • Finalize contract issues • Voluntary participation, invitation probably after summer • Country by country implementation after prioritization • Site level • National AQM-efforts • Comprehensive sites – geographical gaps – easy wins – quick implementation • Tools and support will be developed and offered • No QA or calibration • Operationalization (instrument-EBAS linking) – uses same formats as validated data • Monitoring and trouble fixing • Support to CAMS and external user • Workshop, on use and improvements ?

Thank you for your attention! • Comments or questions?