Elsevier Elsevier Online Submission EES Prepare your article

Elsevier期刊投稿

出版流程－以Elsevier为例 Online Submission EES Prepare your article Pre-Submission Peer Review t Pos tion lica Pub ELSEVIER Editorial-Production Publication Fully citable paper Automatic Handover Early web presence

选择期刊: Science. Direct / Elsevier网 站 搜索期刊 Submit an article 基本信息

How to write a scientific article? 科技论文写作概要

Abstract 举例 Abstract. We tackle the general linear instantaneous model (possibly underdetermined and noisy) where we model the source I prior with a Student t distribution. The conjugate-exponential characterisation of the t distribution as an infinite mixture of scaled Gaussians enables us to do efficient inference. M We study two wellknown inference methods, Gibbs sampler and variational Bayes for Bayesian source separation. We derive both techniques as local message passing algorithms to highlight their algorithmic similarities and to contrast their different convergence characteristics and computational R requirements. Our simulation results suggest that typical posterior distributions in source separation have multiple local D approach where maxima. Therefore we propose a hybrid we explore the state space with a Gibbs sampler and then switch to a deterministic algorithm. This approach seems to be able to combine the speed of the variational approach with the robustness of the Gibbs sampler. 做了什么 主要发现是 什么

注意：二次引用 § 在正文部分： Jones (2004, p. 22) endorses this controversial view, quoting Johnson’s conclusion that the earlier records have been forged. § 在参考文献部分： Jones, P. R. (2004) Golden legends: Christian hagiographies in early medieval Europe. London: Farrar.

研究数据绝不能弄虚作假! § Fabrication is making up data or results, and recording or reporting them. § Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, processes; or changing / omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. “The most dangerous of all falsehoods is a slightly distorted truth. ” – G. C. Lichtenberg (1742 - 1799)

与前人的研究结果相比较，分析异同 … we showed that HR 212 could inhibit NDVmediated cell fusion. . . This was in contrast to the results of others[16], which. . . As a further characterization, we detected the inhibition of HR 212 added… This result implied that the conformational changes of the F protein occurred very quickly after receptor binding to the HN protein… This may explain why the inhibition activity was much lower if added after cleavage activation. However, all these results are still consistent with the idea that HR 2 peptides could interact …

Conclusions举例 In conclusion, our results obtained with mice increase the knowledge on CPF-induced adverse effects, up to now limited to rats. They seem to suggest that not all the CPF effects measured in rats and the related doses can be directly extrapolated to mice, which seem to be more susceptible at least to acute treatment. Even though many questions still remain open, our findings show that the mouse could be considered a suitable experimental model for future studies on the toxic action of organophosphorus pesticides focused on mechanisms, long term and age-related effects.

总结 § § § § § , § Introduction Methods Results And Discussion (Conclusions) 各司其职 § ef § 文题 作者 摘要 关键词 正文 (IMRAD) ve ! ti 阅 ac 查 tr 者 at 读 , 和 ve 辑 ti 编 ma e) 于 or iv 便 nf ct (i fe § 致谢 参考文献 补充材料（Supporting material）

反复阅读“Guide for Authors”!

一个例子 “… Reviewer’s Comments: It would also be good to acknowledge that geographic routing as you describe it is not a complete routing solution for wireless networks, except for applications that address a region rather than a particular node. Routing between nodes requires further machinery, which detracts from the benefits of geographic routing, and which I don't believe you have made practical. Author’s reply: We agree and will add an appropriate caveat. Note that for data-centric storage (name-based exact-match and range queries for sensed events), the storage and query processing mechanisms "natively" address packets geographically--without a "node-to-location" database. … Reviewer’s Comments: The footnotes are driving me crazy! Author’s reply: We'll strive to remove some of them. …” – Dr. Ramesh Govindan, professor, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California http: //enl. usc. edu/~ramesh/writings/files/NSDI_response. txt

一个提出反对意见的例子 Reviewer #4 clearly didn't read my paper carefully enough. Either that or this reviewer doesn't know anything about the field! How should I respond during the rebuttal period? § Please don't say: "If reviewer #4 had just taken the time to read my paper carefully, she would have realized that our algorithm was rotation invariant. " § Instead say: "Unfortunately, Section #4 must not have been as clear as we had hoped because Reviewer #4 didn't understand that our algorithm was rotation invariant and he was therefore skeptical about the general applicability of our approach. Here is a revised version of the second paragraph in Section 4, which should clear up this confusion. "

怎样才能得到“ACCEPTANCE”？ § § § § § Attention to details Check and double check your work Consider the reviews English must be as good as possible Presentation is important Take your time with revision Acknowledge those who have helped you New, original and previously unpublished Critically evaluate your own manuscript Ethical rules must be obeyed – Nigel John Cook, Editor-in-Chief, Ore Geology Reviews

欢迎光临论文吧！ www. paperpub. com. cn

Questions

Thanks! cninfo@elsevier. com x. kang@elsevier. com