Electronic Health Records EHRs Selection and Evaluation Scott
- Slides: 50
Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Selection and Evaluation Scott Code, Aging Services Technology Manager, Leading. Age CAST, Washington, DC
Session Objectives • Explore the analytic tools, clinical decision support systems and interoperability certification functionalities of the CAST EHR Selection Matrix. • Hear about new EHR products for physicians who practice in long-term and post-acute care settings. • Discuss case studies of aging services providers who are implementing EHRs to drive quality initiatives in their organizations.
Speakers • Scott Code, Aging Services Technology Manager, Leading. Age CAST, Washington, DC • Carl Goodfriend, CIO, Provi. Net Solutions, Tinley Park, IL • Larry Carlson, CEO, United Methodist Homes, Neptune, NJ • Dusanka Delovska-Trajkova, CIO, Westminster Ingleside, Washington, DC
EHR Whitepaper http: //www. leadingage. org/Technology_Selection_Tools. aspx
Overview of the Whitepaper Overview of Purpose of Whitepaper Definitions: EHR, EMR, PHR and HIE Planning for and Implementing an EHR System • Assess • Plan • Select Components of EHR Selection Matrix
Portfolio Updates New Selection Matrix Elements • ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding capabilities • Different types of certifications • Analytic Tools • Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) • KLAS Research Rating
Online EHR Selection Tool
CAST EHR Selection Tool Demo http: //www. leadingage. org/ehr/search. aspx
Feedback and Input on Future Initiatives Please complete the following survey: http: //tinyurl. com/pu 2 pwx 8
Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Selection and Evaluation Carl Goodfriend, CIO, Provi. Net Solutions
Provi. NET’s Philosophy… • Technology as a way of life – Staff are more receptive to change as it applies to Technology – Routine & Reliable IT Services – End users can concentrate on operational issues without concerns about availability, access or rekeying.
Provi. NET Solutions • Successful Strategies for implementing an EMR: – – Knowing your starting point Knowing your desired end point Creating a road map Identifying strengths and weaknesses for achieving success • How does this fit your overall IT strategy in the short and long term? • Where is your organization in the process?
Successful Strategies for implementing an EMR: – Know your starting point: Conduct an IT assessment: • Internal audit • Bring in a 3 rd party to perform assessment • Get input for staff
Key areas to consider with Assessment: Technology: • Review current Information Systems capabilities including hardware components, software applications, network infrastructure, telecommunication infrastructure and other lowvoltage systems. • Review internal audit control risks and procedures
Specific infrastructure items to consider • Technology: • • • Optimal bandwidth for your communities Gigabit network within the community Wireless technologies (Resident and business) Point of care devices deployed for EMR Cloud computing vs. self hosting Health information Exchanges (HIE’s)
Key areas to consider with Assessment: Human Capital: • • • Review the existing IT staffing capabilities. Review existing Technology Support Structure and compare to future support needs. Look for natural champions from within or outsource to trusted solutions partner. Evaluate the staff needed to carry out the plan. Evaluate the critical need for 24/7 support.
Specific Support items to consider • Human Capital: • • More sophisticated Management oversight Helpdesk and call center support End user technical support End user software specific support & Training Engineering support Custom development/integration Analysts
Key areas to consider with Assessment: Operations: • Assess Information Systems capabilities to determine functional requirements and gaps. • Inventory and review existing applications. • Review strategic Information Systems goals including reporting capabilities, current and future integration points. • Develop your own wish lists.
Specific Operational items to consider Operations: Typical IT Dept will need to manage these systems: • Email, desktop, workstations • Mobile device deployment • Point of care devices for nurses, CNA’s, therapists, etc. • Life Safety systems (Nurse call, wander, security) • Phone systems/cell phones • Telehealth deployments • Connectivity to hospitals, physicians, labs, pharmacies & HIE • Resident cable television and internet access
Taking control of the results • Once the assessment is complete. – Create your own short and long term IT strategy • Budget accordingly • Monitor to stay on track • Include decision makers and key users
Where are you in the process?
2013 LZ 100 TECHNOLOGY SURVEY
2013 LZ 100 Technology Survey
Thank you! Additional resources http: //www. leadingage. org/State_of_Technology_Executive_Summary. aspx http: //www. leadingage. org/Technology_Selection_Tools. aspx http: //www. leadingage. org/Leading. Age_Ziegler_100_Leaders_in_Technology _Adoption. aspx http: //www. leadingage. org/Are_Senior_Living_Providers_Investing_in_Techn ology. aspx
Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Selection and Evaluation Larry Carlson, CEO, United Methodist Homes
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey • Decision to migrate to a new EMR • Process of making the product selection • Implementation experience
Current Situation SNF only Nursing assessments Nursing notes Kiosks for ADL tracking No EMAR, ETAR, Physician Order Entry
Evaluated the limitations of our current EMR product • Flow of medical record was arduous • Potential to document in areas that did not flow to the MDS • Limited ability to customize – “one size fits all” – Care plans – Admissions and general observations • Difficulty to navigate the medical record • Limited support • State surveyors were unhappy with difficulty of product • Refused to work with ancillary vendors to integrate data flow
Identified the needs that are important for a new EMR • Integration and interface with ancillary software such as: Disease Management, Adverse Event Tracking, MDS Scrubbing, Therapy, Pharmacy, Financial • Flow of medical record for ease of documentation and understanding • Ability to customize Care Plan library – with person-directed living applicability • Ease of documenting skin issues • Assessments that push quality data to populate the MDS, track scheduling dates (falls, pain, cognition, balance, PHQ 9 and BIMMS) • Notifications and alerts to nurses and aides regarding resident care • Efficient and effective quality assessments not only for nursing, but ancillary teams – that can be customized to support best practice.
Important needs (cont. ) • Kiosks – icons that are easy to understand • Potential for Physician integration of documentation vs current paper method • Efficient and effective EMAR, ETAR and Physician Order Entry system • Financial integration that flows from face sheet: insurances, Medicare days etc. • Potential education of families/residents (pop-up training videos) • EMR tools that could be applied on devices such as an IPad for ease of use • Robust Training from software provider
Committee to screen potential products and recommend to senior leadership DONs MDS expert Educator People who had worked with the current EMR Those who had worked with other EMRs People who could be considered spokespersons for the nursing associates who would be utilizing the product Reviewed four EHR Products using the Leading. Age EMR selection tool Narrowed down to two using the Provi. NET comparative selection tool General Overview presentations by each Site visits with end users Reference Checks Recommendation and decision
What we like about our new EMR • • Fully integrated Customizable Look and feel is that of a paper medical record All Product lines: SNF and AL as well as capability for growth into community based services and hospice
Implementation One year process – five communities – all product lines – all modules 1 st community – design/build – Go Live • Two teams: clinical and financial • Hardware Assessment o Wireless Network o Laptops o Kiosks • Training hardware • Assistance from Provi. NET to help with ramifications of implementation decisions • Customization of all forms, assessments and clinical tools • Development of systems process work-flow(s) • Data input – Super-users • Training of end users
Lessons learned from the implementation Process • • • Need consistent trainers from the software vendor Availability of trainers in between site training for questions in real time Guidance from Provi. NET was invaluable to make good decisions at the macro level Put enough time between building rollouts to allow for and ensure system is working properly Cushion budget for staffing patterns and overtime to replace for training and rollout Allow for the time-delay due to financial side closing before rollout of a second building
Links to Case Study: http: //www. leadingage. org/CAST_Case_Study_United_Methodist_Homes _of_New_Jersey_and_Provi. NET. aspx http: //www. leadingage. org/uploaded. Files/Content/Centers/CAST/Resour ces/Provi. Net-UMHNJ. pdf Larry Carlson, President & CEO United Methodist Homes of New Jersey
Health Information Exchange Improves Care Coordination Dusanka Delovska-Trajkova CIO, Westminster Ingleside
Ingleside at King Farm • One of three affiliates of Westminster Ingleside • Opened March 2009 • Located in Rockville, Maryland • Continuing Care Retirement Community • 245 Independent Living apartments, 32 Assisted Living, 45 Comprehensive Care beds
Ingleside at King Farm Project • Improving Transitions of Care With Health Information Exchange – Connect disparate systems for exchange of continuity of care documents (CCDs), including laboratory and radiology results – IKF embraced Encounter Notification System (ENS), MD HIE web portal and DIRECT messaging
Project Partners • Maryland HIE – Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP) • Zane. Net – MD state designated organization • Answers on Demand (AOD) – EHR provider • Radiation Physics – radiology partner • Quest Diagnostics – lab partner • Ingleside at King Farm Medical Director • Ingleside at King Farm Team
HIE in Practice AOD / CPC Tiani 1. Patient Demographic Match - Publish CCD IKF - Labs / Rad / CCD Interface 2. Radiation Physics Push to AOD + Publish to HIE 3. Quest Push to AOD + Publish to HIE HL-7 / CCD
Results Percentage of care transitions accompanied by an electronic summary of care document 60% 35 40 30 75% 80% 47 50 90% 100% Average number of business hours to receive electronic care summary information 23 20 50% 10 40% 0 Q 2 20% Q 3 Q 4 Hospital readmission rates for Comprehensive Care Unit (CCU) residents 7% 6% 6% 3% 6% 5% 5% 4% 6% Q 4 Reduced hospital readmission rates for assisted living and independent living residents 0% Q 2 Q 3 4% 3% 2% 1% 5% Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 0% Q 2 Q 3 Q 4
Results Percentage of CCRC residents admitted to the hospital with an electronic history and physical note during their hospital stay 91% 100% 76% 80% 60% 53% 40% 20% 0% Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 • Percentage of lab results received electronically – 93%
Challenges • Implementation of EHR in house competed with the HIE implementation • CRISP changed directions to not push labs and rads to third party EHRs • Due to competing projects of the lab provider, IKF had to switch labs • Integrate data workflow and healthcare workflow in-house • Treatment relations limit queries
Benefits & Impacts • Clinical – Streamlined access to resident medical history – Improved resident transitions from/to hospitals – Improved quality measures, such as reduced hospital readmissions, reduced medication errors, etc. – Fewer errors and delays in treatment – More accurate follow-up – Decreased wait time for referrals • Financial – Reduced costs for fewer duplicate tests – Reduced operating costs • Safety and security – Data access – Data integrity • Improved communication between all care providers due to access to data => improved care coordination and resident satisfaction
Lessons Learned • Teamwork is the key – Internal team – External groups • Follow consistent work and schedule • Create group and individual education sessions for residents and family members • Be patient • Change does not come easy for the user • Communicate early and often
Next Steps • Piloting Encounter Notifications to family members • Include ADT feed – in progress • Expand HIE to other two affiliates – In progress at Ingleside at Rock Creek, DC • Work with our institutional pharmacy to add list of medications to HIE • Add advance directives to HIE • Add Personal Health Records (PHR)
Questions?
- Electronic health records pros and cons
- System development life cycle of electronic health records
- Electronic health records
- Language
- +electronic +health +records +migration
- Electronic news gathering and electronic field production
- Paper medication administration record
- Paper vs electronic medical records
- Uncitral model law on electronic transferable records
- Benefits of public health
- Electronic medical records
- Is the electronic exchange of money or scrip
- Country evaluation and selection
- Model evaluation and selection
- Two way selection and multiway selection
- Multiway selection in c
- Mass selection and pure line selection
- Woodward fieser rules examples
- Spectroscopy transitions
- Spin selection rule
- Selection rule for electronic transition
- Source selection plan
- Balancing selection vs stabilizing selection
- Similarities
- K selection r selection
- Natural selection vs artificial selection
- Artificial selection vs natural selection
- Disruptive selection example
- Clumped dispersion
- Natural selection vs artificial selection
- Measurement and evaluation for health educators
- Health electronic response data system
- Electronic health record modernization services
- Health and social care component 3 health and wellbeing
- Preparation and maintenance of records and reports
- Disadvantages of written records
- Difference between health education and counselling
- Chapter 3 health wellness and health disparities
- Health education and propaganda
- Chapter 1 lesson 2 what affects your health
- Chapter 1 lesson 1 your total health
- Chapter 17 credit records and laws
- F&p accuracy chart
- Dual enrollment osu
- Chapter 8 budgets and financial records
- Difference between single and double entry system
- Registration and records utep
- Chapter 4 budgets and records
- Single entry and incomplete records
- Blues aab
- Anecdotal example